PAP Test Versus Colposcopy for Cervical Cancer Screening in HIV-Seropositive Women: A Case-Control Study

Shalini Singh,Swati Agrawal,Anju Seth,Smita Singh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-024-01955-z
Abstract:Purpose: The prevalence of pre-invasive lesions (PIL) of cervix in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive women ranges from 12.5 to 69%. Although Papanicolaou (PAP) test is the recommended screening method, it has concerns owing to high false-negative cytology in HIV-infected women and is associated with high attrition rates. The current study aims to compare the role of routine colposcopy with PAP test at initial visit for screening of pre-invasive lesions of cervix in HIV-seropositive women. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 120 HIV-seropositive women aged 25-50 years and screened for PIL of cervix by PAP test and colposcopy simultaneously was conducted. Colposcopy-directed biopsy was taken if SWEDE score was ≥ 5, and the results were compared with PAP report as well as the histopathology findings. Results: Out of the 120 women screened, abnormal colposcopy was found in 22 women (18.3%) out of which 12 (54.54%) were positive for PIL of cervix on biopsy as well. Abnormal PAP test was found in 6 women (5%), and all had abnormal colposcopy and histopathological findings suggestive of PIL as well. There were 6 women with PIL of cervix who would have been missed if only PAP test was to be used as the screening modality. Conclusion: Colposcopy was superior in detection of PIL of cervix in HIV-seropositive women. Therefore, the authors conclude that colposcopy should be incorporated as a primary screening tool for pre-invasive lesions of cervix in HIV-seropositive women.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?