Treatment extent of femoropopliteal disease and clinical outcomes following endovascular therapy

Yong-Hoon Yoon,Jae-Hwan Lee,Won-Mook Hwang,Hyun-Woong Park,Jae-Hyung Roh,Seung-Jun Lee,Young-Guk Ko,Chul-Min Ahn,Cheol Woong Yu,Seung-Whan Lee,Young Jin Youn,Jong Kwan Park,Chang-Hwan Yoon,Seung-Woon Rha,Pil-Ki Min,Seung-Hyuk Choi,In-Ho Chae,Donghoon Choi,Of The K-Vis Investigators On Behalf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00037
2024-09-16
EuroIntervention
Abstract:Background: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has become the preferred treatment modality for femoropopliteal disease. However, there is limited evidence regarding its procedural and clinical outcomes according to the affected area. Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate clinical outcomes and device effectiveness according to treatment extent in the superficial femoral artery (SFA), popliteal artery (PA), or both. Methods: In this study, we analysed EVT for SFA (2,404 limbs), PA (155 limbs), SFA/PA (383 limbs) using the population in the K-VIS ELLA (Korean Vascular Intervention Society Endovascular Therapy in Lower Limb Artery Diseases) registry. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularisation (TLR) at 2 years. Results: The SFA/PA group exhibited a higher prevalence of anatomical complexity, characterised by long lesions, moderate to severe calcification, and total occlusion. The procedures were successful in 97.2% of SFA, 92.9% of PA, and 95.6% of SFA/PA EVTs. The 2-year TLR rates were 21.1%, 18.6%, and 32.7% in the SFA, PA, and SFA/PA groups, respectively. SFA/PA EVT was associated with a significantly increased risk for TLR compared to the SFA group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.48 [1.09-2.00]; p=0.008) and a trend towards an increased risk compared to the PA group (adjusted HR 1.80 [1.00-3.27]; p=0.052). After overlap weighting, the use of a drug-coated balloon (DCB) was shown to be beneficial, with the lowest TLR rate after SFA and SFA/PA EVT. Conclusions: In this large real-world registry, SFA/PA EVT was associated with an increased risk for TLR at 2 years compared to the SFA or PA EVT groups, with favourable outcomes when using a DCB or drug-eluting stent in the SFA/PA EVT group.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?