Abstract:Up to 1% of adults will have a leg ulcer at some time. Most leg ulcers are venous in origin and are caused by high pressure in the veins due to blockage or damaged valves. Venous ulcer prevention and treatment typically involves the application of compression bandages/stockings to improve venous return and thus reduce pressure in the legs. Other treatment options involve removing or repairing veins. Most venous ulcers heal with compression therapy, but ulcer recurrence is common. For this reason, clinical guidelines recommend that people continue with compression treatment after their ulcer has healed. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2000 and last updated in 2014. To assess the effects of compression (socks, stockings, tights, bandages) for preventing recurrence of venous leg ulcers. In August 2023, we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, and two ongoing trials registries. We also scanned the reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews and health technology reports. There were no restrictions on language, date of publication, or study setting. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated compression bandages or hosiery for preventing the recurrence of venous ulcers. At least two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data. Our primary outcome was reulceration (ulcer recurrence anywhere on the treated leg). Our secondary outcomes included duration of reulceration episodes, proportion of follow‐up without ulcers, ulceration on the contralateral leg, noncompliance with compression therapy, comfort, and adverse effects. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE methodology. We included eight studies (1995 participants), which were published between 1995 and 2019. The median study sample size was 249 participants. The studies evaluated different classes of compression (UK class 2 or 3 and European (EU) class 1, 2, or 3). Duration of follow‐up ranged from six months to 10 years. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for risk of bias (lack of blinding), imprecision, and indirectness. EU class 3 compression stockings may reduce reulceration compared with no compression over six months (risk ratio (RR) 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 to 0.76; 1 study, 153 participants; low‐certainty evidence). EU class 1 compression stockings compared with EU class 2 compression stockings may have little or no effect on reulceration over 12 months (RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.67 to 4.32; 1 study, 99 participants; low‐certainty evidence). There may be little or no difference in rates of noncompliance over 12 months between people using EU class 1 stockings and people using EU class 2 stockings (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.75; 1 study, 99 participants; low‐certainty evidence). UK class 2 hosiery compared with UK class 3 hosiery may be associated with a higher risk of reulceration over 18 months to 10 years (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.91; 5 studies, 1314 participants; low‐certainty evidence). People who use UK class 2 hosiery may be more compliant with compression treatment than people who use UK class 3 hosiery over 18 months to 10 years (RR for noncompliance 0.69, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.99; 5 studies, 1372 participants; low‐certainty evidence). There may be little or no difference between Scholl UK class 2 compression stockings and Medi UK class 2 compression stockings in terms of reulceration (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.28; 1 study, 166 participants; low‐certainty evidence) and noncompliance (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.84.1 to 12; 1 study, 166 participants; low‐certainty evidence) over 18 months. No studies compared different lengths of compression (e.g. below‐knee versus above‐knee), and no studies measured duration of reulceration episodes, ulceration on the contralateral leg, proportion of follow‐up without ulcers, comfort, or adverse effects. Compression with EU class 3 compression stockings may reduce reulceration compared with no compression over six months. Use of EU class 1 compression stockings compared with EU class 2 compression stockings may result in little or no difference in reulceration and noncompliance over 12 months. UK class 3 compression hosiery may reduce reulceration compared with UK class 2 compression hosiery; however, higher compression may lead to lower compliance. There may be little to no difference between Scholl and Medi UK class 2 compression stockings in terms of reulceration and noncompliance. There was no information on duration of reulceration episodes, ulceration on the contralateral leg, proportion of follow‐up without ulcers, comfort, or adverse effects. More research is needed to investigate acceptable modes of long‐term compression therapy for people at risk of recurrent venous ulceration. Future trials should consider interventions to improve compliance with compression tr -Abstract Truncated-

Impact on healing of double-layered compression stocking in the treatment of severe venous leg ulcers: A prospective, multicenter, controlled trial

Addressing the Impact of Deep Venous Stenting on the Management of Venous Ulcer

[Efficacy of compression knee-high socks ULCER X in treatment of venous-genesis trophic ulcers]

A meta‐review of the impact of compression therapy on venous leg ulcer healing

A systematic review of the impact of compression therapy on quality of life and pain among people with a venous leg ulcer

A randomised controlled trial of compression therapies for the treatment of venous leg ulcers (VenUS 6): study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel-group, three-arm randomised controlled trial

Impact of primary dressings on healing of venous leg ulcers: a French cohort study from the healthcare insurance database

Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers

Cost-effectiveness of compression technologies for evidence-informed leg ulcer care: results from the Canadian Bandaging Trial

Integrating new approaches to care in a vascular wound clinic

Compression for the management of venous leg ulcers: which material do we have?

Comparative Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Two-Layer Versus Four-Layer Compression Bandages for Venous Leg Ulcers: A Prospective Study

ECAMulticapa: Effectiveness of double-layered compression therapy for healing venous ulcers in primary care: a Study Protocol

VIEW-VLU observational study of the effect of Varithena on wound healing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers

Assessing the healthcare costs associated with venous leg ulcer compression bandages - A scoping review

Consistent application of compression: An under-considered variable in the prevention of venous leg ulcers

Clinical Progress of Compression Therapy in Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers

Below-Knee Elastic Compression Stockings To Prevent the Post-Thrombotic Syndrome

Should intermittent pneumatic compression devices be standard therapy for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events in major surgery? Protocol for a randomised clinical trial (IMPOSTERS)

Comparative Efficacy of Postoperative Compression Methods After EVLT for Great Saphenous Vein Insufficiency

Effect of Flat-Knitted Medical Compression Stockings on Venous Malformations