Abstract:Purpose of review: Describe and evaluate the integration of 3D printing-related innovations into current cardiovascular treatment paradigms and examine the state of regulatory and reimbursement hurdles ahead. Recent findings: Mounting years of clinical experience have established the utility of printed models of patient anatomy in numerous treatment and teaching scenarios, most notably as pre- and intra-procedural planning tools guiding decision-making for congenital heart disease and catheter-based interventions. In part due to a continued lack of reimbursement and under-defined (and slow to evolve) regulatory status, these use cases remain largely investigational even as they grow increasingly routine. Patients, physicians, and/or imaging centers therefore remain burdened by the associated cost to create such models, and the perceptual and decision-making enhancements, while demonstrable and significant, still may not clearly or independently justify a potentially high cost. Simulation and implantable device applications may represent a deeper well of unrealized value in cardiovascular intervention; however, further development of these applications relies on-and is throttled by-progress in material science and tissue-engineering research. The relevance of simulation applications in recent years is also now in competition with digital analogs including augmented and virtual reality. Innovative incorporation of alternative manufacturing processes such as porous scaffold infusion, injection molding, and vascular mesh forming can provide immediate access to more realistic tissue-mimicking materials and custom implantable devices, while comparable and directly printable materials continue to be developed. Tissue-engineering applications remain years if not decades away from a more substantive role in translatable clinical research. Regulatory challenges associated with in-house manufacture of implantable investigational devices are complex and subject to change, and the success of some in navigating these hurdles in non-cardiovascular applications is instructive and encouraging. Complex geometries characterizing cardiovascular anatomy are an ideal use case for translating the perceptual advantages of printed models of patient anatomy into better decision-making, especially so in the setting of congenital or post-surgical anatomy. Procedural planning applications take further advantage of the demonstrably robust dimensional reproduction of patient anatomy, with notably rapid integration into surgical and catheter-based intervention workflows. Despite a continued lack of codification in the healthcare system, 2018 could be a milestone year for 3D printing services, pending a successful application for a CPT Category III designation.

3-Dimensional printing in vascular disease: From manufacturer to clinical use

Three-Dimensional Printing Applications in Percutaneous Structural Heart Interventions

3D Printing for Cardiovascular Applications: From End-to-End Processes to Emerging Developments

The Use of Three-Dimensional Printing in Cardiac Structural Disease: A Review

Printing@Clinic: from Medical Models to Organ Implants

Three-dimensional printing in orthopaedic surgery: A review of current and future applications

Manufacturing Better Outcomes in Cardiovascular Intervention: 3D Printing in Clinical Practice Today

Three-Dimensional Bioprinting in Cardiovascular Disease: Current Status and Future Directions

3D printing: a useful tool for safe clinical practice in children with complex vasculature

Cardiac patient-specific three-dimensional models as surgical planning tools

3D Printed Models in Cardiovascular Disease: An Exciting Future to Deliver Personalized Medicine

A Step towards the Future

Systematic Review on the Use of 3D-Printed Models for Planning, Training and Simulation in Vascular Surgery

Current and future applications of 3D printing in congenital cardiology and cardiac surgery.

Clinical Applications of Patient-Specific 3D Printed Models in Cardiovascular Disease: Current Status and Future Directions

Applications of three-dimensional printing in percutaneous closure of aortic-to-right ventricle fistula after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a case report

Patient-Specific Coronary Artery Bypass Graft 3D Printing: Implications for Procedural Planning in Complex Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Three-Dimensional Printing to Guide the Application of Modified Prefenestrated Stent Grafts to Treat Aortic Arch Disease

Unsuspected Limitations of 3D Printed Model in Planning of Complex Aortic Aneurysm Endovascular Treatment

3D Bioprinting for Vascularization

3D Printing Applications for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement