Counterpoint: The lens fluid circulation model--a critical appraisal.

D. Beebe,R. Truscott
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-5350a
2010-05-01
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Abstract:In a study first reported more than 25 years ago, the investigators detected electrical currents outside the lens that depended on the activity of lens ion transporters.1 Based on these ionic currents and measures of lens electrical impedance, a model was developed that postulated the existence of fluid flow through the lens fiber cell cytoplasm (hereafter referred to as the fluid circulation model [FCM]).2,3 Although the FCM is more than 20 years old, direct evidence to support it is still lacking. Our analysis suggests that the FCM, as previously described, has conceptual shortcomings and does not appear to be consistent with published data. Contrary to the postulates of the FCM, it is unlikely that fluid circulation through the fiber cell cytoplasm is needed to maintain the metabolism of fiber cells that have degraded their organelles. We suggest that, if water did flow through the cytoplasm of fiber cells from the lens center to its periphery in the manner outlined in the FCM, it would be harmful to lens transparency. We accept the initial observation that ion currents, generated by active transport, flow around and through the lens. However, we argue that these ion movements do not create a microcirculatory system in which water flows from the lens center to its periphery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?