Somapacitan in Children Born SGA: 52-week Efficacy, Safety, and IGF-I Response Results from the Phase 2 REAL5 Study

Anders Juul,Philippe Backeljauw,Michael Højby,Jan Frystyk,Masanobu Kawai,Rasmus Juul Kildemoes,Anders Krogh Lemminger,Agnès Linglart,Nehama Zuckerman-Levin,Reiko Horikawa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae616
2024-09-13
Abstract:Context: Somapacitan, a once-weekly reversible albumin-binding GH derivative, is evaluated in short children born small for gestational age (SGA). Objective: Evaluate efficacy, safety, tolerability as well as total and bioactive insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) response of once-weekly somapacitan compared to daily GH in children born SGA. Methods: REAL5 is a randomized, multi-center, open-label, controlled phase 2 study comprising a 26-week main phase, 26-week extension, and an ongoing 4-year safety extension (NCT03878446). Setting: Thirty-eight sites across 12 countries. Patients: Sixty-two GH-treatment-naïve, prepubertal short children born SGA were randomized; 61 completed 52-weeks of treatment. Interventions: Patients randomized (1:1:1:1:1) to somapacitan (0.16, 0.20 or 0.24 mg/kg/week) or daily GH (0.035 or 0.067 mg/kg/day), all administered subcutaneously. Results: Estimated mean height velocity (HV; cm/year) at week 52 was 8.5, 10.4 and 10.7 cm/year for somapacitan 0.16, 0.20 and 0.24 mg/kg/week, respectively, and 9.3 and 11.2 cm/year for daily GH 0.035 and 0.067 mg/kg/day, respectively. Dose-dependent increases in total IGF-I as well as peak IGF-I bioactivity were observed for both treatments and were similar between comparator groups. For somapacitan, exposure-response modelling indicated highest efficacy with 0.24 mg/kg/week after 52 weeks of treatment. Similar safety and tolerability were demonstrated across all groups. Conclusions: A sustained dose-dependent growth response was demonstrated for somapacitan after 52 weeks of treatment. Overall, somapacitan 0.24 mg/kg/week provides similar efficacy, safety, and tolerability, as well as comparable bioactive and total IGF-I response, as daily GH (0.067 mg/kg/day) in children born SGA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?