Abstract:Background: Most obstetric emergencies are initially managed in the emergency department (ED). The Supreme Court decision of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overturning Roe v. Wade, in June 2022, eliminated constitutional protection of abortion rights, allowing states to swiftly enact laws that can greatly change reproductive medicine. In this post-Roe landscape, the ambiguity and uncertainty being imposed on clinicians regarding the legality of certain interventions may have catastrophic effects. To understand and plan for the changes that will come and attempt to mitigate adverse outcomes, the authors first assessed the current state of pregnancy-related complication care in the ED setting. This study utilized data obtained from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) to evaluate trends in pregnancy-related ED visits from 2016 to 2020 that could be impacted by restricted abortion access and trigger laws. The authors subsequently analyzed the legislative changes and translated the pertinent ones to dispel misunderstandings and provide a framework for appropriate medical practice. Methods: The retrospective study utilized data from the NHAMCS database from 2016 to 2020, encompassing an estimated total of 4,556,778 pregnancy-related ED visits. NHAMCS is a multi-stage probabilistic sample collected by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) using an annual survey of EDs in the United States. All data were summarized using descriptive statistics such as proportions and 95% confidence intervals Furthermore, the supreme court decision was analyzed in addition to multiple state laws and legal texts. The findings were summarized and discussed. Results: The majority (79.4%) of all studied visits were for patients between the ages of 18-34 years, capturing those in peak reproductive years. This age group also comprised of the bulk (76.4%) of visits for pathologic pregnancies, including ectopic and molar pregnancies, and 79.8% of visits for a spontaneous miscarriage or threatened miscarriage in early pregnancy. Black patients accounted for 25.7%, white patients 70.1%. Regarding ethnicity, patients were separated into Hispanic and non-Hispanic, with Hispanic patients comprising 27% of all ED visits for included diagnoses between 2016 and 2020. Most visits for complications following an induced abortion occurred in the south (70.8%) and were nearly twice as likely to occur in non-metropolitan areas. Approximately 18% patients presenting with a pathologic pregnancy required admission to the hospital and approximately 50% of those visits for pathologic pregnancies and visits for bleeding in pregnancy had a procedure in the ED (49.8% and 49.5%). There were 111,264 estimated visits in which methotrexate was administered, amounting to approximately 1 in 7 visits for ectopic or molar pregnancy. In this data set, approximately 14,000 miscarriage and early bleeding patients received misoprostol. Conclusion: Pregnancy-related ED visits comprise of a significant proportion of emergency care. As it relates to many of the trends previously elucidated on, the true extent of the burden cannot be predicted. It must be emphasized that contrary to popular belief, Dobbs v. Jackson does not prohibit termination of pregnancy in the setting of life-threatening conditions to the mother, including ectopic pregnancy, preeclampsia, and others, but the resultant uncertainty and ambiguity surrounding the constitutional change is leading to an over-compliance of the law, necessarily obstructing reproductive health care. The authors recommend that physicians be mindful of the rapidly-evolving laws in their particular state, and to also practice in accordance with Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). Patient safety must be prioritized.

Abortion access for U.S. active-duty servicewomen: A scoping review

Decision and economic evaluation of abortion availability in the United States military

Female-Specific Health Care of Military Female-Designated Service Members and Veterans: A Systematic Overview of Reviews

Providers' experiences with abortion care: A scoping review

The Impact of Military Trauma Exposures on Servicewomen's Pregnancy Outcomes: A Scoping Review

Providers’ Experience of Abortion Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Experiences of women who travel for abortion: A mixed methods systematic review

Perinatal mental health and active-duty military spouses: a scoping review

The impact of provider restrictions on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence

Legal but limited? Abortion service availability and readiness assessment in Nepal

Effect of active-duty military service on neonatal birth outcomes: a systematic review

The experiences of nurses and midwives who provide surgical abortion care: A qualitative systematic review

Assessment of Navy Provider Knowledge of Women's Mental Health Services, Treatment Practices, and Training

Experiences of abortion care in Australia: a qualitative study examining multiple dimensions of access

Sexual and reproductive health in military settings: A qualitative study

Practices and Policies That Support Breastfeeding Among Military Women: A Systematic Review

Demand for Abortion Training and Technical Assistance in Primary Care: Unmet Need and Programmatic Interventions

What if It Were Me? A Qualitative Exploratory Study of Emergency Nurses' Clinical Decision Making Related to Obstetrical Emergencies in the Context of a Post-Roe Environment

A national analysis of ED presentations for early pregnancy and complications: Implications for post-Roe America

Estimates of unintended pregnancy among US active-duty service women and the impact on Women Peace and Security objectives as measured by potential readiness days lost

The Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Research Program: Assessing the Reproductive Health of U.S. Active-Duty Women