Identifying gaps in maternal knowledge and care-seeking for neonatal health: A mixed methods study in rural pregnant women

M Yogesh,B M Bhavana,Nanveet Padhiyar,Rohankumar Gandhi,Swati Misra
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_66_24
2024-07-05
Abstract:Background: Knowledge of neonatal danger signs is crucial for timely care-seeking and improved newborn survival. This study assessed this knowledge among pregnant women in rural western Gujarat. Materials and methods: A mixed methods study was conducted among 390 pregnant women selected through a two-stage sampling procedure. Quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Qualitative data were gathered via in-depth interviews with 20 purposively sampled women. Logistic regression identified determinants of knowledge. Thematic analysis was done for qualitative data. Results: The majority of women were young (220, 56.5% ≤25 years), literate (333, 85%), and from rural backgrounds (320, 82%). Overall, 232 (59.5%) knew about cord care, and 301 (77.2%) correctly identified breastfeeding initiation time. Recognition of key danger signs such as fever (311, 79.7%), vomiting (292, 74.8%), and jaundice (275, 70.5%) was high, but only 70 (18%) identified chest in-drawing. Multiparity (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.4, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.2-3.9), lower age (AOR: 3.8, 95% CI: 2.4-5.8), education (AOR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.5-6.4), inadequate counseling (AOR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.82-5.190), and normative delivery (AOR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.16-5.006) were associated with poor knowledge. Qualitative findings revealed reliance on informal sources, family elders, and financial constraints as key barriers along with limited comprehension of some danger signs. Conclusion: Focused interventions via health workers, family members, and community platforms are needed to increase neonatal danger signs awareness among vulnerable women in the region to enable timely care-seeking.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?