A controlled study of palpatory diagnostic procedures: Assessment of sensitivity and specificity

R. Tarr,R. Feely,Daniel L. Richardson,A. Mulloy,K. Nelson,W. E. Perrin,E. Allin,M. Efrusy,S. I. Greenstein,Richard D. Vati
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7556/JAOA.1987.87.4.296
1987-04-01
The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association
Abstract:A study was conducted to determine if experienced osteopathic physicians could diagnose disease states using palpatory findings as their source of diagnostic clues. Five examiners saw a total of 100 subjects. 1\vo of the examiners were allowed to palpate the subject; the other 3 examiners were not. None of the 5 examiners had any knowledge of the subject's medical history, and none were allowed to talk to the subjects. Thus the nonpalpating examiners only had visual clues to aid in diagnosis, while the palpating examiners had both visual clues and palpatory clues. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the palpating and nonpalpating examiners thus indicated the ability of the palpating physicians to distinguish disease states by palpatory findings alone. One hundred subjects
What problem does this paper attempt to address?