Respiratory effort in mechanical ventilation weaning Prediction: An observational, case-control study

Guojun He,Yijiao Han,Liang Zhang,Chunfeng He,Hongliu Cai,Xia Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103831
2024-09-11
Abstract:Background: The diaphragm is crucial for ventilator weaning, but its specific impact on weaning indicators needs further clarification. This study investigated the variability in weaning outcomes across different diaphragm function populations and the value of respiratory drive and inspiratory effort in weaning. Methods: This observational case-control study enrolled patients on mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h and completed a 30-minute spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) with pressure-support ventilation for the first time. After the SBT, airway pressure at 100 ms during occlusion (P0.1), inspiratory effort, and diaphragmatic ultrasound were evaluated to predict weaning outcomes. Weaning failure was defined as re-intubation within 48 h of weaning, the need for therapeutic non-invasive ventilation, or death. Results: 68 patients with a mean age of 63.21 ± 15.15 years were included. In patients with diaphragm thickness (DT) ≥ 2 mm, P0.1 (P=0.002), pressure-muscle index (PMI) (P=0.012), and occluded expiratory airway pressure swing (ΔPocc) (P=0.030) were significantly higher in those who failed weaning. Conversely, for patients with DT<2 mm, PMI (P=0.003) and ΔPocc (P=0.002) were lower in the weaning failure group. Additionally, within the DT≥2 mm group, P0.1 demonstrated a higher area under the curve (AUC) for weaning prediction (0.889 vs. 0.739) compared to those with DT<2 mm. Conclusions: PMI and ΔPocc are predictive of weaning outcomes in patients with diaphragm thickness ≥ 2 mm, where the assessment value of P0.1 is notably higher. Diaphragm function significantly influences the accuracy of weaning predictions based on respiratory drive and inspiratory effort. Implications for clinical practice: Our findings indicate that the effectiveness of respiratory drive and inspiratory effort in predicting successful weaning from mechanical ventilation may vary across different patient populations. Diaphragm function plays a crucial role in weaning assessments, particularly when using P0.1, the pressure-muscle index (PMI), and occluded expiratory airway pressure swing (ΔPocc).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?