Abstract:Introduction Early identification of atrial fibrillation (AF) can enable interventions that reduce cardiovascular events. However, AF remains undiagnosed in about 10-20% of affected individuals, and paroxysmal AF often remains undetected despite the use of in-clinic ECGs, consumer smartwatch ECGs, or ambulatory ECG monitoring. We therefore investigated whether ambulatory ECG patch-based monitoring without AF can predict AF in the subsequent 1-year post monitoring. Purpose This study aims to validate a machine-learning model for AF prediction within 1-year post-wear, based on the observation of non-AF single-lead ECG recordings. Methods We considered a clinically monitored cohort of 67,296 individuals wearing multiple single-lead ECG multi-day ambulatory monitoring patches as part of real-world care. For all selected individuals, the first patch recorded no occurrences of AF and was worn for a minimum of 6.5 days. We assess the risk of future AF based on the raw ECG, heartrate variability, frequency of ectopic beats, age and gender (ECG model), which is then compared with the risk assessment by a model based on age and gender (Baseline model). We then observe AF incidence on subsequent patches worn within one year from the first patch. We evaluated the model's accuracy by observing the number of AF cases identified (or missed) among the individuals with highest risk according to the model. Results In the clinically monitored cohort, a total of 3463 individuals experienced AF within the next year (incidence 5.1%) after a first AF-free monitoring period of a minimum 6.5 days. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve shows an area under the curve (AUC) for the ECG model of 0.75 (95% CI: [0.74, 0.76]), and for the Baseline model of 0.66 (CI: [0.65, 0.67]). When selecting the top 20% (13,459) participants with the highest risk and verifying who developed AF in the following 1-year, we obtain positive prediction value (PPV) or precision of 12% and sensitivity (recall) of 46% for the ECG model (which correctly identifies 1,594 individuals with incident AF), and of 8% and 29%, respectively, for the Baseline model (p-value<0.001). (Figure) Conclusion A machine learning model using as input an AF-free single-lead ECG can quantify the risk of observing AF in a population including individuals with low burdens of paroxysmal or new onset of AF within 1 year. Further research and validation are needed to enhance the interpretability and clinical applicability of the model, while prediction may be further improved with clinical AF diagnoses ascertained from other data sources. The findings of this study have important implications for the early detection and management of AF, potentially enabling earlier intervention and improved outcomes in individuals with undiagnosed AF.

[MVP Risk score and new atrial fibrillation diagnosis: Prospective cohort PREFATE study]

Arrhythmic risk stratification in post-myocardial infarction patients with preserved ejection fraction: the PRESERVE EF study

Automated interpretations of single-lead electrocardiograms predict incident atrial fibrillation: The VITAL-AF Trial

Prevalence of frequent premature ventricular contractions and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in older women screened for atrial fibrillation in the Women's Health Initiative

Prognostic usefulness of left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation (from the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy Study)

Risk assessment of post-myocardial infarction patients with preserved ejection fraction using 45-min short resting Holter electrocardiographic recordings

Atrial Fibrillation Burden Detected by Dual-Chamber Pacemakers As a Predictor for Cardiac Outcomes: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.

Protocol for a multicentre and prospective follow-up cohort study of early detection of atrial fibrillation, silent stroke and cognitive impairment in high-risk primary care patients: the PREFA-TE study

Predicting 1-year atrial fibrillation risk from a patch-based ambulatory ECG monitoring without atrial fibrillation

Pre-discharge prediction of long-term prognosis in patients after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction - the ValAMI-P risk score

Echocardiographic Risk Assessment to Guide Screening for Atrial Fibrillation

Risk stratifiers for arrhythmic and non-arrhythmic mortality after acute myocardial infarction

Association between postprocedural echocardiographic and laboratory data and clinical outcomes in patients with preserved ejection fraction after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Prognostic role of atrial fibrillation in patients affected by chronic heart failure. Data from the MECKI score research group

Abstract 315: Feasibility of outpatient ambulatory ECG monitoring to screen for silent atrial fibrillation: Pilot Findings from Screening Trial for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation (STUDY-AF)

Amplified P-wave duration predicts new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Electrocardiogram prediction of atrial fibrillation risk after stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Accuracy of a Standalone Atrial Fibrillation Detection Algorithm Added to a Popular Wristband and Smartwatch: Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Prediction of the success of electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation using parameters obtained by spectral and vectorcardiographic analysis of the ECG

Digital devices for heart rhythm monitoring in atrial fibrillation patients scheduled for elective electrical cardioversion. Kardiover study

Simple risk scoring using sinus rhythm electrocardiograms predicts the incidence of atrial fibrillation in the general population