Insulin-resistance as a modifiable pathway to cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia: A systematic review

Virginio Salvi,Beniamino Tripodi,Giancarlo Cerveri,Giovanni Migliarese,Lorenzo Bertoni,Gabriele Nibbio,Stefano Barlati,Antonio Vita,Claudio Mencacci
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2024.09.008
2024-09-11
Abstract:Background: Cognitive deficits are difficult to treat and negatively influence quality of life and functional outcomes of persons with schizophrenia. In the last twenty years, extensive literature demonstrated that persons with diabetes and insulin resistance (IR) also display cognitive deficits. Being type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and IR highly frequent in persons with schizophrenia, it is plausible to hypothesize that these conditions might play a role in determining dyscognition. If that is the case, acting on glucose dysmetabolism may eventually improve cognitive functioning. This review aims at: 1. evaluating the association between IR or T2DM and cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia; 2. reviewing the evidence that pharmacological treatment of IR or T2DM may improve dyscognition in schizophrenia. Methods: Two systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, PsycInfo, and Scopus. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: From the first search we included 17 studies, 8 on the effects of T2DM and 9 on the effects of IR-other prediabetes measures on cognition in persons with schizophrenia. From the second search we included 12 studies investigating the effect on cognition of glucose (4 studies), insulin (2 studies), metformin (2 studies), PPAR-γ agonists (2 studies), GLP-1 agonist (1 study), bromocriptine (1 study). Conclusions: T2DM was associated with worse cognitive function in persons with schizophrenia, while IR was less strongly associated with cognitive dysfunction. Evidence regarding the efficacy of glucose-lowering medications on cognition in schizophrenia is inconclusive, yet methodological issues likely contribute to explain conflicting results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?