Neck and chest rejuvenation with fractional 1440 and 1927‐nm low‐powered diode laser
Lauren Hoffman,Eleanor Smeallie,Nkem Ugonabo,Anne Chapas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23767
2024-02-11
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
Abstract:Objectives Ultraviolet light and infrared radiation exposure to the chest and neck can result in photoaging changes, such as rhytids, skin roughness, and dyschromia, which can be treated with nonablative fractionated lasers. The low‐powered fractionated 1440 and 1927‐nm diode lasers have been shown to safely reduce facial photodamage. This study was conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of a low‐powered 1440 and 1927‐nm nonablative fractionated diode laser in addressing photoaging symptoms, such as rhytids, skin roughness, and dyschromia, of the neck and chest. Methods In a prospective, single‐arm, nonrandomized study, a cohort of 24 adult female patients with photodamage to their neck and chest received four treatments to these areas, administered at 4‐week intervals. Treatments consisted of four passes on high settings with the 1440 nm handpiece followed by four passes with the 1927 nm handpiece. Photographs were taken at each study visit. Study investigators graded wrinkle severity, texture, and mottled pigmentation of the treated area at baseline and follow‐up visit, 3 months after the fourth treatment. Subjects also rated clinical improvement of their neck and chest, along with overall appearance. Blinded evaluators used baseline and follow‐up photographs to quantify improvements of rhytids and hyperpigmentation of the neck and chest using a 6‐point improvement scale. Results Of the original cohort, 20 subjects completed all four treatments and 3‐month follow‐ups. The mean rhytid scores improved by 0.7 ± 1.0 for both neck and chest. Meanwhile, texture scores improved by 1.2 ± 0.4 for the neck and 1.4 ± 0.7 for the chest, with pigment scores improving by 0.5 ± 0.6 for the neck and 0.67 ± 0.7 for the chest. Statistical analysis using paired t‐tests, performed on all pre‐ and posttreatment scores, revealed significant differences (p
dermatology,surgery