Qualitative Exploration of the "Guilt Gap" Among Physician-Faculty with Caregiving Responsibilities

Jamie Takayesu,Lauren Szczygiel,Rochelle D Jones,Lydia Perry,Laura Balcer,Gail Daumit,Wonder Drake,Heather Gatcombe,Christina Mangurian,Bess Marshall,Judith Regensteiner,Reshma Jagsi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0106
2024-09-11
Abstract:Introduction: Differences in time commitments and resources contribute to the difficulties of work-life integration for many physician-scientists, particularly for women with family caregiving responsibilities. Understanding the challenges faced by this population is critical for the retention of these critical members of the workforce. Methods: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with recipients of the 2017 Doris Duke Charitable Foundation's Fund to Retain Clinical Scientists (FRCS) and reviewed application narratives from the 2020 award recipients. Award recipients were asked about their caregiving responsibilities and careers, particularly as they related to the impact of the FRCS award and the aftereffects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysts then iteratively revised the coding scheme and interpreted the data using qualitative thematic analysis. Results: Of the 14 interviewees and 19 narrative contributors, 25 (76%) were women. The main qualitative themes that emerged were as follows: (1) women experience unrealistically high caregiving burdens, (2) women are overburdened by disadvantageous and undervalued expectations at work, (3) work-life expectations increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, and (4) unrealistic work-life expectations led to guilt and burnout. Conclusions: These findings provide a rich understanding of the factors contributing to guilt and burnout among physician-scientists, particularly women, and how work duties that increase physician obligations exacerbated these challenges. Understanding these experiences is critical to supporting and retaining a diverse workforce in academic medicine.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?