Impact of Virtual Rehabilitation in Adjunct to Conventional Physical Therapy on Proximal Humerus Fracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abhishek Daf,Deepali S Patil
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.56022
2024-03-12
Cureus
Abstract:Introduction Humerus fractures are fairly prevalent in the general population, and their incidence increases with age. The majority of minimally displaced fractures may be treated with prompt rehabilitation. An interdisciplinary team strategy involving experienced musculoskeletal specialists, geriatricians, and skilled physiotherapists should be employed for optimal therapy. Rehabilitation is essential in coping with the consequences of the fracture. The greatest current information for shoulder rehabilitation comprises the use of counseling, exercises, and mobility of restricted joints to regain upper limb function. Virtual reality (VR) based therapies are among the most effective since they may give visual, aural, and somatosensory cues to help patients. In fact, VR-based treatments have been shown to enhance motor function, neuropathic pain, balance, and aerobic performance in individuals with neurological disorders. However, there is limited evidence on the use of VR's therapeutic efficacy on individuals with musculoskeletal disorders. This study applied oculus-guided VR rehabilitation in addition to conventional physical therapy for the rehabilitation of patients with proximal humerus fractures. This study aims to assess the impact of virtual rehabilitation in adjunct to conventional physical therapy on proximal humerus fracture. Methods This study is a randomized controlled trial in which 50 patients were divided randomly into two groups: 25 patients in group A and 25 patients in group B. Group A was an experimental group that received VR plus conventional therapy. At the same time, group B was a control group that received only conventional therapy. Shoulder range of motion (ROM), manual muscle testing (MMT), numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH), and Shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) were used as outcome measures of this study. Results There is an increase in flexion (t=7.58, P=0.0001), extension (t=6.90, P=0.0001), abduction (t = 9.57, P=0.0001), internal rotation (t=6.31, P=0.0001), and external rotation (t=3.41, P=0.001) in group A is statistically more significant than group B. The improvement in MMT scores in group B (t=1.71, P=0.10) is not significant, whereas improvements in group A are statistically significant (t=13.86, P=0.0001). The SPADI and DASH scores improved more significantly in group A (t=62.46, P=0.0001, and t=57.48, P=0.0001, respectively) than in group B (t=39.14, P=0.0001 and 46.58, P=0.0001, respectively). There is no significant difference in pain outcomes between the two groups. Conclusion The findings of this study reveal that virtual rehabilitation in adjunct to conventional physical therapy on proximal humerus fracture is more effective in improving shoulder ROM, muscle strength, and upper limb function than conventional therapy alone. However, no intervention can be considered superior to others in terms of the management of pain associated with proximal humerus fracture.