Angiotensin II type-1 receptor autoantibody positively correlates with the rate of metaphase I oocytes in infertility with ovulatory disorder

Xuemin Li,Guifang Yang,Jie Ren,Xiaonuo Li,Yao Chen,Yinan Zhang,Yuhui Shi,Xiaoli Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2024.104327
2024-09-07
Abstract:The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays an important role in reproductive function. Our previous study identified that angiotensin II type-1 receptor autoantibody (AT1-AA), an autoantibody that activates RAS, was closely associated with infertility. However, its distribution in different types of infertility remained unclear. This study was designed to explore the distribution of AT1-AA in infertile patients and the connections between AT1-AA and oocyte development and pregnancy outcome. A total of 184 infertile women participated, with samples collected from peripheral venous blood. ELISA was used to detect AT1-AA levels in their sera. It was observed that the proportion of ovulation-disorder factors in AT1-AA-positive group was significantly higher than that in negative group (P=0.001). In 59 infertile women with ovulatory disorders, compared with negative group, AT1-AA-positive group had lower rate of retrieval (P=0.032) and metaphase II (MII) oocytes (P=0.011) but higher proportion of metaphase I (MI) oocytes (P=0.019). A negative correlation was found between the levels of AT1-AA and rate of retrieval and MII oocytes (P=0.027; P=0.043), whereas a positive correlation was observed with the proportion of MI oocytes (P=0.002). Moreover, a specific predictive value for proportion of reaching MII and MI oocytes was exhibited by AT1-AA (P < 0.01; P < 0.05). But no significant difference in embryonic parameters or pregnancy outcomes between two groups was observed (P > 0.05). This study revealed that serum AT1-AA levels were significantly increased in infertile women with ovulatory disorders and positively correlated with proportion of MI oocytes, but not associated with outcomes of assisted reproduction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?