Abstract:BACKGROUND: Intraoperative mechanical ventilation may yield lung injury. To date, there is no consensus regarding the best ventilator strategy for abdominal surgery. We aimed to investigate the impact of the mechanical ventilation strategies used in 2 recent trials (Intraoperative Protective Ventilation [IMPROVE] trial and Protective Ventilation using High versus Low PEEP [PROVHILO] trial) on driving pressure (ΔPRS), mechanical power, and lung damage in a model of open abdominal surgery. METHODS: Thirty-five Wistar rats were used, of which 28 were anesthetized, and a laparotomy was performed with standardized bowel manipulation. Postoperatively, animals (n = 7/group) were randomly assigned to 4 hours of ventilation with: (1) tidal volume (VT) = 7 mL/kg and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) = 1 cm H2O without recruitment maneuvers (RMs) (low VT/low PEEP/RM−), mimicking the low-VT/low-PEEP strategy of PROVHILO; (2) VT = 7 mL/kg and PEEP = 3 cm H2O with RMs before laparotomy and hourly thereafter (low VT/moderate PEEP/4 RM+), mimicking the protective ventilation strategy of IMPROVE; (3) VT = 7 mL/kg and PEEP = 6 cm H2O with RMs only before laparotomy (low VT/high PEEP/1 RM+), mimicking the strategy used after intubation and before extubation in PROVHILO; or (4) VT = 14 mL/kg and PEEP = 1 cm H2O without RMs (high VT/low PEEP/RM−), mimicking conventional ventilation used in IMPROVE. Seven rats were not tracheotomized, operated, or mechanically ventilated, and constituted the healthy nonoperated and nonventilated controls. RESULTS: Low VT/moderate PEEP/4 RM+ and low VT/high PEEP/1 RM+, compared to low VT/low PEEP/RM− and high VT/low PEEP/RM−, resulted in lower ΔPRS (7.1 ± 0.8 and 10.2 ± 2.1 cm H2O vs 13.9 ± 0.9 and 16.9 ± 0.8 cm H2O, respectively; P< .001) and less mechanical power (63 ± 7 and 79 ± 20 J/min vs 110 ± 10 and 120 ± 20 J/min, respectively; P = .007). Low VT/high PEEP/1 RM+ was associated with less alveolar collapse than low VT/low PEEP/RM− (P = .03). E-cadherin expression was higher in low VT/moderate PEEP/4 RM+ than in low VT/low PEEP/RM− (P = .013) or high VT/low PEEP/RM− (P = .014). The extent of alveolar collapse, E-cadherin expression, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha correlated with ΔPRS (r = 0.54 [P = .02], r = −0.48 [P = .05], and r = 0.59 [P = .09], respectively) and mechanical power (r = 0.57 [P = .02], r = −0.54 [P = .02], and r = 0.48 [P = .04], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this model of open abdominal surgery based on the mechanical ventilation strategies used in IMPROVE and PROVHILO trials, lower mechanical power and its surrogate ΔPRS were associated with reduced lung damage.

Driving pressure: A useful tool for reducing postoperative pulmonary complications

Driving pressure decoded: Precision strategies in adult respiratory distress syndrome management

Intraoperative ventilation strategies to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

How to Prevent Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury in Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation? A Randomized Prospective Study

Association between driving pressure-guided ventilation and postoperative pulmonary complications in surgical patients: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

The effect of driving pressure-guided versus conventional mechanical ventilation strategy on pulmonary complications following on-pump cardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial

The association between intraoperative low driving pressure ventilation and perioperative healthcare-associated costs: A retrospective multicenter cohort study

Lung Protective Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: a Systematic Review Incorporating a Bayesian Approach

Driving pressure of respiratory system and lung stress in mechanically ventilated patients with active breathing

Physiological effects of two driving pressure-based methods to set positive end-expiratory pressure during one lung ventilation

Perioperative Lung Protection: Clinical Implications

Effect of positive end expiratory pressure on atelectasis in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia: A lung ultrasonography study

Driving pressure during general anesthesia for minimally invasive abdominal surgery (GENERATOR)—study protocol of a randomized clinical trial

Intra-operative adherence to lung-protective ventilation: a prospective observational study

Effect of Individualized PEEP Guided by Driving Pressure on Diaphragm Function in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Practical Review of Mechanical Ventilation in Adults and Children in the Operating Room and Emergency Department

Perioperative lung-protective ventilation strategy reduces postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing thoracic and major abdominal surgery

[Intraoperative Ventilation in Adults]

Lung and Diaphragm Protection During Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The Impact of Driving Pressure-Guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Ventilation on Cerebral Blood Flow and Pulmonary Function in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Impact of Different Ventilation Strategies on Driving Pressure, Mechanical Power, and Biological Markers During Open Abdominal Surgery in Rats