The effect of localized cooling on conduction in cat nerves

W. Douglas,J. Malcolm
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005392
1955-10-28
Journal of Physiology
Abstract:It is an old observation that cold blocks nervous conduction and that nerve fibres subserving different modalities differ in their susceptibilities. Commonly it is believed that susceptibility to cold block is related to the diameter of the individual nerve fibre. The evidence for this belief is, however, fragmentary and conflicting. Comparing C fibres with A fibres, Lundberg (1952) found that the former were most resistant to cold block, but in Sinclair & Hinshaw's (1951) experiments the fibres most resistant to cold were not C fibres but certain fibres of the A group. A similar divergence of results is also apparent in experiments to assess the differential susceptibilities of different sized fibres within the large (myelinated) fibre group itself. In some experiments the largest of these fibres have proved the most sensitive to cold block (Torrance & Whitteridge, 1947; Whitteridge, 1948), while in others (Lundberg, 1952; Dodt, 1953) they have proved least sensitive. The work reported here describes the effects of localized cooling on several nerves in the cat.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?