Abstract:Background: Although some advances have been made in recent years, the lack of measures remains a major challenge in the field of implementation research. This results in frequent adaptation of implementation measures for different contexts-including different types of respondents or professional roles-than those for which they were originally developed and validated. The psychometric properties of these adapted measures are often not rigorously evaluated or reported. In this study, we examined the internal consistency, factor structure, and structural invariance of four well-validated measures of inner setting factors across four groups of respondents. The items in these measures were adapted as part of an evaluation of a large-scale organizational change in a rehabilitation hospital, which involved transitioning to a new building and a new model of patient care, facilitated by a significant redesign of patient care and research spaces. Methods: Items were tailored for the context and perspective of different respondent groups and shortened for pragmatism. Confirmatory factor analysis was then used to test study hypotheses related to fit, internal consistency, and invariance across groups. Results: The survey was administered to approximately 1208 employees; 785 responded (65% response rate) across the roles of clinician, researcher, leader, support staff, or dual clinician and researcher. For each of the four scales, confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated adequate fit that largely replicated the original measure. However, a few items loaded poorly and were removed from the final models. Internal consistencies of the final scales were acceptable. For scales that were administered to multiple professional roles, factor structures were not statistically different across groups, indicating structural invariance. Conclusions: The four inner setting measures were robust for use in this new context and across the multiple stakeholder groups surveyed. Shortening these measures did not significantly impair their measurement properties; however, as this study was cross sectional, future studies are required to evaluate the predictive validity and test-retest reliability of these measures. The successful use of adapted measures across contexts, across and between respondent groups, and with fewer items is encouraging, given the current emphasis on designing pragmatic implementation measures.

Adapting the Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Organizational Climate Questionnaire for Acute Care Nurse Practitioners

[Preliminary Study on the Relationship Between Organizational Climate, Leadership Style, and Job Satisfaction in the Context of Nurse Practitioners]

Organizational Culture and Trust Affect the Team-BasedPractice and Job Satisfaction of Nurse Practitioners in Acute Care Hospitals: A National Survey

Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure novice nurses' perceived ability to provide care in acute situations - PCAS

Nurses' perception of ethical climate at a large academic medical center

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Authentic Nurse Leadership Questionnaire

Psychometric Properties of the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Behavior of Oncology Nurses on Advance Care Planning Instrument

O-104 VALIDATION OF A NEWLY DEVELOPED QUESTIONNAIRE TO MEASURE THE ORGANIZATIONAL HEALTH CULTURE AMONG A COHORT OF MANDARIN-SPEAKING FIREFIGHTERS

The Nurse Perceived Adequacy of Staffing Scale for general hospital wards: A development and psychometric validation study

Instrument Development: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence in Palliative Care Concepts Held by Trauma and Neuroscience Intensive Care Nurses

Measuring Asian nurses' organizational commitment: a critical analysis of the psychometric properties of two organizational commitment instruments

Evaluating the organisational climate in Italian public healthcare institutions by means of a questionnaire

Development and Validation of the Chronic Condition Physician-Patient Relationship Scale (CC-PPR): A patient-informed measurement tool.

The patient-reported outcome measure for older people living with frailty receiving acute care (PROM-OPAC): field-testing and validation

Development and Testing of the Relational and Structural Components of Innovativeness Across Academia and Practice for Healthcare Progress Scale

The HDR CARE Scale, Inpatient Version: A validated survey instrument to measure environmental affordance for nursing tasks in inpatient healthcare settings

Pragmatic adaptation of implementation research measures for a novel context and multiple professional roles: a factor analysis study

Development and Testing of an Instrument to Measure Professionalism in Nursing

Development and psychometric testing of the Pediatric Atraumatic Care Attitude Scale (PACAS) in pediatric nurses

Measuring the Nursing Work Environment during Public Health Emergencies: Scale Adaptation and Validation

Organizational facilitators and barriers to optimal APRN practice: An integrative review