Abstract:Context: Local health departments (LHDs) are implementing a national mandate to engage community partners, including individuals, businesses, and community- and faith-based organizations in the larger public health emergency preparedness (PHEP) enterprise. Objective: Investigate how LHDs of varying size and resource levels successfully engage the community in PHEP to help uncover "best practices" that aspiring agencies can replicate, particularly in low-resource environments. Design: In-depth, semistructured qualitative interviews with practitioners from 9 highly performing LHDs. Setting: Participating agencies comprised equal amounts of small (serving <50 000 residents), medium (serving 50 000-500 000 residents), and large (serving >500 000 residents) LHDs and were diverse in terms of geographic region, rural-urban environment, and governance structure. Participants: A cross section of LHD staff (n = 34) including agency leaders, preparedness coordinators, public information officers, and health educators/promoters. Main outcome measure: Local health department performance at community engagement as determined by top scores in 2 national LHD surveys (2012, 2015) regarding community engagement in PHEP. Results: Based on key informant accounts, high-performing LHDs show a holistic, organization-wide commitment to, rather than discrete focus on, community engagement. Best practices clustered around 5 domains: administration (eg, top executive who models collaborative behavior), organizational culture (eg, solicitous rather than prescriptive posture regarding community needs), social capital (eg, mining preexisting community connections held by other LHD programs), workforce skills (eg, cultural competence), and methods/tactics (eg, visibility in community events unrelated to PHEP). Conclusions: For LHDs that wish to enhance their performance at community engagement in PHEP, change will entail adoption of evidence-based interventions (the technical "what") as well as evidence-based administrative approaches (the managerial "how"). Smaller, rural LHDs should be encouraged that, in the case of PHEP community engagement, they have unique social assets that may help offset advantages that larger, more materially resourced metropolitan health departments may have.

Using National Public Health Accreditation to Explore Quality Improvement and Performance Management in Small Local Health Departments

Quality improvement coaching to build capacity within health departments: reflections and recommendations

High-Performing Local Health Departments Relate Their Experiences at Community Engagement in Emergency Preparedness

Influence of a quality improvement learning collaborative program on team functioning in primary healthcare.

Using a Cohort-Based Quality Improvement Coaching Model to Optimize Chronic Disease Management for Federally Qualified Health Center Patients

Helping Unlock Better Care (HUB|C) using quality improvement science in community pharmacies - An implementation method

"It Feels Like a Lot of Extra Work": Resident Attitudes About Quality Improvement and Implications for an Effective Learning Health Care System

Results of a Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Partnerships for Health: A Quality Improvement Initiative for Diabetes Care

Re-thinking How We Teach Quality Improvement: Adding Meaning to an ACGME Requirement

How eight primary care practices initiated and maintained quality monitoring and reporting

How to sustainably build capacity in quality improvement within a healthcare organisation: a deep-dive, focused qualitative analysis

Facilitators of interdepartmental quality improvement: a mixed-methods analysis of a collaborative to improve pediatric community-acquired pneumonia management

Engaging community pharmacists in quality improvement (QI): a qualitative case study of a partnership between a Higher Education Institute and Local Pharmaceutical Committees

Using lean thinking to improve hypertension in a community health centre: a quality improvement report

Quality management systems in Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services: a review of the literature

A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Model to Optimize Perinatal and Primary Care in the Community Health Setting

Engaging Physicians in Improvement Priorities Through the American Board of Medical Specialties Portfolio Program

Home health agency adoption of quality improvement activities and association with performance

The Meso-Level in Quality Improvement: Perspectives From a Maternal-Neonatal Health Partnership in South Africa

Continuous quality improvement at the frontline: One interdisciplinary clinical team's four‐year journey after completing a virtual learning program

Using Quality Improvement to Expand and Align State Public Health Long-Term Follow-up Data Collection Across Newborn Screening Conditions