Analyzing learning curve for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in urology resident training programme: comparative analysis

Yusuf Arıkan,Yavuz Onur Danacioğlu,Deniz Noyan Özlü,Ömer Koraş,Büşra Emir,Mehmet Zeynel Keskin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01624-w
2024-09-09
Urolithiasis
Abstract:Introduction: This article attempts to provide a comprehensive review of the learning objectives and importance of the supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) technique. Material method: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of Supine PCNL between January 2018 and January 2024. We divided the groups into 3: residents between 2 and 3 years (Group 1), residents between 4 and 5 years (Group 2), and endourologist (Group 3). The 2-3-year resident started to perform PCNL for the first time, while the 4-5-year resident started to perform Supine PCNL for the first time while previously performing prone PCNL. Results: Access, fluoroscopy, and operation time were higher in Group 1, shorter in Group 2, and shortest in Group 3 (p < 0.001). Postoperative length of stay and the need for additional treatment were found to be shorter (p < 0.001), and the stone-free rate (SFR) increased (p < 0.001) from Group 1 to Group 3. The highest complication rates were observed in Group 1 (p = 0.002). SFR rate increased as the number of cases increased in Group 1 patients. Success was stable after 46-60 cases in terms of SFR. In Group 2, the SFR rate was stable after 31-45. Cases: The most complications were observed in Group 1 and the least in Group 3. Conclusion: In 2-3-year residents, access time and fluoroscopy time decrease with experience. In 4-5-year residents, due to their expertise in prone PCNL, the operation time and fluoroscopy time decrease with the number of cases performed. SFR is higher after 46-60 cases for 2-3-year residents and 31-45 cases for 4-5-year residents.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?