Integrated germline and somatic molecular profiling to detect cancer predisposition has a high clinical impact in poor-prognosis paediatric cancer
Noemi A Fuentes-Bolanos,Eliza Courtney,Chelsea Mayoh,Meera Warby,Loretta M S Lau,Marie Wong-Erasmus,Dong-Anh Khuong-Quang,Paulette Barahona,Bhavna Padhye,Sam El-Kamand,Sheena Nunag,Pamela Ajuyah,Alexandra Sherstyuk,Ann-Kristin Altekoester,Ashleigh Sullivan,Nicola Poplawski,Catherine Kiraly-Borri,Sarah O'Sullivan,Helen Marfan,Rozanna Alli,Lisette Curnow,Kanika Bhatia,Antoinette Anazodo,Toby N Trahair,Marion Mateos,Jordan R Hansford,Hetal Dholaria,Sarah Josephi-Taylor,Andrew S Moore,Wayne Nicholls,Nicholas G Gottardo,Peter Downie,Seong-Lin Khaw,Heather Tapp,Geoffrey McCowage,Luciano Dalla-Pozza,Frank Alvaro,Paul J Wood,Vanessa Tyrrell,Michelle Haber,Mark J Cowley,Paul G Ekert,Glenn M Marshall,Judy Kirk,Katherine Tucker,Mark Pinese,David S Ziegler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.08.24311493
2024-08-09
Abstract:Germline predisposition has a significant role in paediatric cancer. However, the optimal approach to identifying cancer-causing germline pathogenic variants (GPV) in children, and even the prevalence of GPV among children with cancer, remain unclear. Here we report our findings from a comprehensive survey of GPV in 496 children with poor-prognosis cancer. By integrating tumour and germline molecular profiling we identified GPV in 15.5% of patients, 48.1% of whom had not met clinical genetic testing criteria. Although the cancer type was outside the recognised phenotypic spectrum for 43.7% of reported GPV, 63.2% of these were clinically actionable for cancer risk. Integrated germline-tumour analysis increased the GPV detection rate by 8.5%, and informed germline interpretation in 14.3% of patients with GPV, highlighting the value of integrated analyses. Our findings establish the benefit of broad integrated tumour-germline screening, over targeted phenotype-driven testing, to detect GPV in children with poor prognosis cancers.
Oncology