Addition of ruxolitinib and decitabine to modified busulfan/cyclophosphamide conditioning regimen for prophylaxis relapse in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: the phase 2 prospective study

Yujun Wei,Kun Qian,Ning Le,Lili Wang,Fei Li,Songhua Luan,Lu Wang,Xiangshu Jin,Bo Peng,Nan Wang,Liping Dou,Daihong Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-05972-w
2024-09-07
Abstract:The prognosis of patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is dismal even after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), with relapse remaining the leading cause of treatment failure. Here, we investigated whether ruxolitinib and decitabine plus modified busulfan-cyclophosphamide (mBu/Cy) conditioning could reduce relapse in high-risk AML after allo-HSCT. This prospective, single-arm, phase II trial enrolled 37 patients who received allo-HSCT between September 2020 and March 2022 at the First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital. Eligible patients (10-62 years) had relapsed/refractory, positive measurable residual disease (MRD) prior to conditioning or adverse genetic abnormalities. Ruxolitinib (35 mg twice daily, days - 15 to - 10) and decitabine (20 mg/m2/day, days - 15 to - 10) were administered followed by mBu/Cy conditioning. All patients achieved engraftment. The cumulative incidences (CIs) of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II-IV and III-IV were 35.0% and 10.5%, respectively. The 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 8.1%. The 1-year CI of relapse was 29.7% among all patients, 0% in patients who achieved the first complete remission (CR1) prior to conditioning, and 0% in those with MRD-negative prior to conditioning. The 1-year non-relapse mortality was 5.4%. The 1-year probabilities of overall survival, disease-free survival, and GVHD-free relapse-free survival were 70.3%, 62.2%, and 54.1%, respectively. In conclusion, the novel conditioning showed primary efficacy in terms of a reduction in relapse in high-risk patients with AML after allo-HSCT, especially in those who achieved CR1 and MRD-negative prior to conditioning. Also, the new conditioning regimen may help reduce the incidence of chronic GVHD. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04582604.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?