Abstract:Background: While known efficacious preventive health interventions exist, the current capacity to scale up these interventions is limited. In recent years, much attention has focussed on developing frameworks and methods for scale-up yet, in practice, the pathway for scale-up is seldom linear and may be highly dependent on contextual circumstances. Few studies have examined the process of scaling up from decision to implementation nor examined the sustainability of scaled-up interventions. This study explores decision-makers' perceptions from real-world scaled-up case studies to examine how scale-up decisions were made and describe enablers of successful scale-up and sustainability. Methods: This qualitative study included 29 interviews conducted with purposively sampled key Australian policy-makers, practitioners and researchers experienced in scale-up. Semi-structured interview questions obtained information regarding case studies of scaled-up interventions. The Framework Analysis method was used as the primary method of analysis of the interview data to inductively generate common and divergent themes within qualitative data across cases. Results: A total of 31 case studies of public health interventions were described by interview respondents based on their experiences. According to the interviewees' perceptions, decisions to scale up commonly occurred either opportunistically, when funding became available, or when a deliberate decision was made and funding allocated. The latter scenario was more common when the intervention aligned with specific political or strategic goals. Decisions to scale up were driven by a variety of key actors such as politicians, senior policy-makers and practitioners in the health system. Drivers of a successful scale-up process included good governance, clear leadership, and adequate resourcing and expertise. Establishing accountability structures and appropriate engagement mechanisms to encourage the uptake of interventions were also key enablers. Sustainability was influenced by evidence of impact as well as good acceptability among the general or target population. Conclusions: Much like Kingdon's Multiple Streams Theory of 'policy windows', there is a conceptually similar 'window for scale-up', driven by a complex interplay of factors such as political need, strategic context, funding and key actors. Researchers and policy-makers need to consider scalability from the outset and prepare for when the window for scale-up opens. Decision-makers need to provide longer term funding for scale-up to facilitate longer term sustainability and build on the resources already invested for the scale-up process.

Five lessons for avoiding failure when scaling in conservation

Conservation successes at micro-, meso- and macroscales

Scaling up area-based conservation to implement the Global Biodiversity Framework's 30x30 target: The role of Nature's Strongholds

A framework for catalysing the rapid scaling of urban biodiversity stewardship programs

Scaling-Up Biodiversity-Ecosystem Functioning Research

The positive impact of conservation action

Striving for population-level conservation: integrating physiology across the biological hierarchy

Making more effective use of human behavioural science in conservation interventions

One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice

Step back from the forest and step up to the Bonn Challenge: How a broad ecological perspective can promote successful landscape restoration

Conservation Resource Allocation, Small Population Resiliency, and the Fallacy of Conservation Triage

Overcoming the coupled climate and biodiversity crises and their societal impacts

Scaling Pathways for Inclusive Green Growth

Measuring the Impact of Conservation: The Growing Importance of Monitoring Fauna, Flora and Funga

The challenge of designing meaningful performance measures for evaluating the success of conservation translocations

Biodiversity conservation as a promising frontier for behavioural science

Reframing conservation physiology to be more inclusive, integrative, relevant and forward-looking: reflections and a horizon scan

Dynamic evaluation of agricultural research for development supports innovation and responsible scaling through high-level inclusion

Identifying Potential Cropland Losses When Conserving 30% and 50% Earth with Different Approaches and Spatial Scales

Why scale is vital to plan optimal Nature-Based Solutions for resilient cities

Scaling up population health interventions from decision to sustainability - a window of opportunity? A qualitative view from policy-makers