Adaptive frame/field motion compensated video coding

Atul Puri,R. Aravind,B. Haskell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-5965(93)90026-P

1993-02-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

A Delphi consensus statement for digital surgery

Kyle Lam,Michael D Abràmoff,José M Balibrea,Steven M Bishop,Richard R Brady,Rachael A Callcut,Manish Chand,Justin W Collins,Markus K Diener,Matthias Eisenmann,Kelly Fermont,Manoel Galvao Neto,Gregory D Hager,Robert J Hinchliffe,Alan Horgan,Pierre Jannin,Alexander Langerman,Kartik Logishetty,Amit Mahadik,Lena Maier-Hein,Esteban Martín Antona,Pietro Mascagni,Ryan K Mathew,Beat P Müller-Stich,Thomas Neumuth,Felix Nickel,Adrian Park,Gianluca Pellino,Frank Rudzicz,Sam Shah,Mark Slack,Myles J Smith,Naeem Soomro,Stefanie Speidel,Danail Stoyanov,Henry S Tilney,Martin Wagner,Ara Darzi,James M Kinross,Sanjay Purkayastha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00641-6

2022-07-19

Abstract:The use of digital technology is increasing rapidly across surgical specialities, yet there is no consensus for the term 'digital surgery'. This is critical as digital health technologies present technical, governance, and legal challenges which are unique to the surgeon and surgical patient. We aim to define the term digital surgery and the ethical issues surrounding its clinical application, and to identify barriers and research goals for future practice. 38 international experts, across the fields of surgery, AI, industry, law, ethics and policy, participated in a four-round Delphi exercise. Issues were generated by an expert panel and public panel through a scoping questionnaire around key themes identified from the literature and voted upon in two subsequent questionnaire rounds. Consensus was defined if >70% of the panel deemed the statement important and <30% unimportant. A final online meeting was held to discuss consensus statements. The definition of digital surgery as the use of technology for the enhancement of preoperative planning, surgical performance, therapeutic support, or training, to improve outcomes and reduce harm achieved 100% consensus agreement. We highlight key ethical issues concerning data, privacy, confidentiality and public trust, consent, law, litigation and liability, and commercial partnerships within digital surgery and identify barriers and research goals for future practice. Developers and users of digital surgery must not only have an awareness of the ethical issues surrounding digital applications in healthcare, but also the ethical considerations unique to digital surgery. Future research into these issues must involve all digital surgery stakeholders including patients.
Consensus for Operating Room Multimodal Data Management: Identifying Research Priorities for Data-Driven Surgery

Alain Garcia Vazquez,Juan Verde,Ariosto Hernandez Lara,Didier Mutter,Lee Swanstrom

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000459

2024-07-02

Abstract:Introduction: This study aimed to identify research areas that demand attention in multimodal data-driven surgery for improving data management in minimally invasive surgery. Background: New surgical procedures, high-tech equipment, and digital tools are increasingly being introduced, potentially benefiting patients and surgical teams. These innovations have resulted in operating rooms evolving into data-rich environments, which, in turn, requires a thorough understanding of the data pipeline for improved and more intelligent real-time data usage. As this new domain is vast, it is necessary to identify where efforts should be focused on developing seamless and practical data usage. Methods: A modified electronic Delphi approach was used; 53 investigators were divided into the following groups: a research group (n=9) for problem identification and a narrative literature review, a medical and technical expert group (n=14) for validation, and an invited panel (n=30) for two electronic survey rounds. Round 1 focused on a consensus regarding bottlenecks in surgical data science areas and research gaps, while round 2 prioritized the statements from round 1, and a roadmap was created based on the identified essential and very important research gaps. Results: Consensus panelists have identified key research areas, including digitizing operating room (OR) activities, improving data streaming through advanced technologies, uniform protocols for handling multimodal data, and integrating AI for efficiency and safety. The roadmap prioritizes standardizing OR data formats, integrating OR data with patient information, ensuring regulatory compliance, standardizing surgical AI models, and securing data transfers in the next generation of wireless networks. Conclusions: This work is an international expert consensus regarding the current issues and key research targets in the promising field of data-driven surgery, highlighting the research needs of many operating room stakeholders with the aim of facilitating the implementation of novel patient care strategies in minimally invasive surgery.
Evolution of the digital operating room: the place of video technology in surgery

Samy Cheikh Youssef,Kaled Haram,Jonathan Noël,Vipul Patel,James Porter,Prokar Dasgupta,Nadine Hachach-Haram

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02830-7

2023-02-20

Abstract:Purpose: The aim of this review was to collate current evidence wherein digitalisation, through the incorporation of video technology and artificial intelligence (AI), is being applied to the practice of surgery. Applications are vast, and the literature investigating the utility of surgical video and its synergy with AI has steadily increased over the last 2 decades. This type of technology is widespread in other industries, such as autonomy in transportation and manufacturing. Methods: Articles were identified primarily using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases. The MeSH terms used were "surgical education", "surgical video", "video labelling", "surgery", "surgical workflow", "telementoring", "telemedicine", "machine learning", "deep learning" and "operating room". Given the breadth of the subject and the scarcity of high-level data in certain areas, a narrative synthesis was selected over a meta-analysis or systematic review to allow for a focussed discussion of the topic. Results: Three main themes were identified and analysed throughout this review, (1) the multifaceted utility of surgical video recording, (2) teleconferencing/telemedicine and (3) artificial intelligence in the operating room. Conclusions: Evidence suggests the routine collection of intraoperative data will be beneficial in the advancement of surgery, by driving standardised, evidence-based surgical care and personalised training of future surgeons. However, many barriers stand in the way of widespread implementation, necessitating close collaboration between surgeons, data scientists, medicolegal personnel and hospital policy makers.
SAGES consensus recommendations on surgical video data use, structure, and exploration (for research in artificial intelligence, clinical quality improvement, and surgical education)

Jennifer A. Eckhoff,Guy Rosman,Maria S. Altieri,Stefanie Speidel,Danail Stoyanov,Mehran Anvari,Lena Meier-Hein,Keno März,Pierre Jannin,Carla Pugh,Martin Wagner,Elan Witkowski,Paresh Shaw,Amin Madani,Yutong Ban,Thomas Ward,Filippo Filicori,Nicolas Padoy,Mark Talamini,Ozanan R. Meireles

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10288-3

2023-07-29

Surgical Endoscopy

Abstract:Abstract Background Surgery generates a vast amount of data from each procedure. Particularly video data provides significant value for surgical research, clinical outcome assessment, quality control, and education. The data lifecycle is influenced by various factors, including data structure, acquisition, storage, and sharing; data use and exploration, and finally data governance, which encompasses all ethical and legal regulations associated with the data. There is a universal need among stakeholders in surgical data science to establish standardized frameworks that address all aspects of this lifecycle to ensure data quality and purpose. Methods Working groups were formed, among 48 representatives from academia and industry, including clinicians, computer scientists and industry representatives. These working groups focused on: Data Use, Data Structure, Data Exploration, and Data Governance. After working group and panel discussions, a modified Delphi process was conducted. Results The resulting Delphi consensus provides conceptualized and structured recommendations for each domain related to surgical video data. We identified the key stakeholders within the data lifecycle and formulated comprehensive, easily understandable, and widely applicable guidelines for data utilization. Standardization of data structure should encompass format and quality, data sources, documentation, metadata, and account for biases within the data. To foster scientific data exploration, datasets should reflect diversity and remain adaptable to future applications. Data governance must be transparent to all stakeholders, addressing legal and ethical considerations surrounding the data. Conclusion This consensus presents essential recommendations around the generation of standardized and diverse surgical video databanks, accounting for multiple stakeholders involved in data generation and use throughout its lifecycle. Following the SAGES annotation framework, we lay the foundation for standardization of data use, structure, and exploration. A detailed exploration of requirements for adequate data governance will follow.

surgery
Defining digital surgery: a SAGES white paper

The SAGES Digital Surgery Working Group,Jawad T. Ali,Gene Yang,Courtney A. Green,Benjamin L. Reed,Amin Madani,Todd A. Ponsky,Jeffrey Hazey,Steven S. Rothenberg,Christopher M. Schlachta,Dmitry Oleynikov,Nova Szoka

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10551-7

2024-01-07

Surgical Endoscopy

Abstract:Digital surgery is a new paradigm within the surgical innovation space that is rapidly advancing and encompasses multiple areas.

surgery
Surgical Sabermetrics

Emma E Howie,Olivia Ambler,Eilidh Gm Gunn,Roger D Dias,Stephen J Wigmore,Richard Je Skipworth,Steven J Yule,Emma E. Howie,Eilidh GM Gunn,Roger D. Dias,Stephen J. Wigmore,Richard JE Skipworth,Steven J. Yule

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006211

IF: 13.787

2024-01-23

Annals of Surgery

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the current evidence for surgical sabermetrics: digital methods of assessing surgical non-technical skills and investigate the implications for enhancing surgical performance. Background: Surgeons need high-quality, objective, and timely feedback to optimise performance and patient safety. Digital tools to assess non-technical skills have potential to reduce human bias and aid scalability. However, we do not fully understand which of the myriad of digital metrics of performance assessment have efficacy for surgeons. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PSYCINFO databases following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. MeSH terms and keywords included “Assessment” “Surgeons” and “Technology”. Eligible studies included digital assessment of non-technical skills for surgeons, residents, and/or medical students within an operative context. Results: From 19,229 articles screened, 81 articles met inclusion criteria. The studies varied in surgical specialities, settings, and outcome measurements. A total of 122 distinct objective, digital metrics were utilized. Studies digitally measured at least one category of surgical non-technical skill using single(n=54) or multiple objective measures(n=27). The majority of studies utilised simulation(n=48) over live operative settings (n=32). Surgical Sabermetrics has been demonstrated to be beneficial in measuring cognitive load(n=57), situation awareness(n=24), communication(n=3), teamwork(n=13), and leadership(n=2). No studies measured intraoperative decision-making. Conclusions: The literature detailing the intersection between surgical data science and operative non-technical skills is diverse and growing rapidly. Surgical Sabermetrics may provide a promising modifiable technique to achieve desirable outcomes for both the surgeon and the patient. This study identifies a diverse array of measurements possible with sensor devices and highlights research gaps, including need for objective assessment of decision-making. Future studies may advance the integration of physiological sensors to provide holistic assessment of surgical performance.

surgery
Intraoperative application of mixed and augmented reality for digital surgery: a systematic review of ethical issues

Frank Ursin,Cristian Timmermann,Lasse Benzinger,Sabine Salloch,Fabian-Alexander Tietze

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1287218

IF: 1.8

2024-03-14

Frontiers in Surgery

Abstract:Introduction Head-mounted displays (HMDs) that superimpose holograms onto patients are of particular surgical interest as they are believed to dramatically change surgical procedures by including safety warning and allowing real-time offsite consultations. Although there are promising benefits of mixed and augmented reality (MR/AR) technologies in surgery, they also raise new ethical concerns. The aim of this systematic review is to determine the full spectrum of ethical issues that is raised for surgeons in the intraoperative application of MR/AR technology. Methods Five bibliographic databases were searched for publications on the use of MR/AR, HMDs and other devices, their intraoperative application in surgery, and ethical issues. We applied qualitative content analysis to the n = 50 articles included. Firstly, we coded the material with deductive categories derived from ethical frameworks for surgical innovations, complications and research. Secondly, clinical aspects with ethical relevance were inductively coded as ethical issues within the main categories. Thirdly, we pooled the ethical issues into themes and sub-themes. We report our findings according to the reporting guideline RESERVE. Results We found n = 143 ethical issues across ten main themes, namely patient-physician relationship, informed consent, professionalism, research and innovation, legal and regulatory issues, functioning equipment and optimal operating conditions, allocation of resources, minimizing harm, good communication skills and the ability to exercise sound judgement. The five most prevalent ethical issues are “Need for continuous research and innovation”, “Ensuring improvement of the learning curve”, “MR/AR enables new maneuvers for surgeons”, “Ensuring improvement of comfort, ergonomics, and usability of devices,” and “Not withholding MR/AR if it performs better”. Conclusions Recognizing the evidence-based limitations of the intraoperative MR/AR application is of paramount importance to avoid ethical issues, but clinical trials in surgery pose particular ethical risks for patients. Regarding the digital surgeon, long-term impact on human workforce, potentially harmful “negative training,” i.e., acquiring inappropriate behaviors, and the fear of surveillance need further attention. MR/AR technologies offer not only challenges but significant advantages, promoting a more equitable distribution of surgical expertise and optimizing healthcare. Aligned with the core principle of social justice, these technologies enable surgeons to collaborate globally, improving training conditions and addressing enduring global healthcare inequalities.

surgery
The Reputational Penalty for Aggressive Accounting: Earnings Restatements and Management Turnover

Hemang Desai,Chris E. Hogan,Michael S. Wilkins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.471842

2004-08-01

Abstract:In this paper we investigate the reputational penalties to managers of firms announcing earnings restatements. More specifically, we examine management turnover and the subsequent employment of displaced managers at firms announcing earnings restatements during 1997 or 1998. In contrast to prior research (Beneish 1999; Agrawal et al. 1999), which does not find increased turnover following GAAP violations or revelation of corporate fraud, we find that 60 percent of restating firms experience a turnover of at least one top manager within 24 months of the restatement compared to 35 percent among age‐, size‐, and industry‐matched firms. Moreover, the subsequent employment prospects of the displaced managers of restatement firms are poorer than those of the displaced managers of control firms. Our results hold after controlling for firm performance, bankruptcy, and other determinants of management turnover, and suggest that both corporate boards and the external labor market impose significant penalties on man...
Fostering innovation and sustainable thinking in surgery: an evaluation of a surgical hackathon

Z Ahmed,A Zargaran,D Zargaran,J Davies,A Ponniah,P Butler,A Mosahebi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0010

Abstract:Introduction: Surgery represents a major source of carbon emissions, with numerous initiatives promoting more sustainable practices. Healthcare innovation and the development of a digitally capable workforce are fundamental in leveraging technologies to tackle challenges, including sustainability in surgery. Methods: A surgical hackathon was organised with three major themes: (1) how to make surgery greener, (2) the future of plastic surgery in 10 years, and (3) improving healthcare outcomes using machine learning. Lectures were given on sustainability and innovation using the problem, innovation, market size, strategy and team (PIMST) framework to support their presentations, as well as technological support to translate ideas into simulations or minimum viable products. Pre- and post-event questionnaires were circulated to participants. Results: Most attendees were medical students (65%), although doctors and engineers were also present. There was a significant increase in delegates' confidence in approaching innovation in surgery (+20%, p < 0.001). Reducing waste packaging (70%), promoting recyclable material usage (56%) and the social media dimension of public perceptions towards plastic surgery (40%) were reported as the most important issues arising from the hackathon. The top three prizes went to initiatives promoting an artificial intelligence-enhanced operative pathway, instrument sterilisation and an educational platform to teach students research and innovation skills. Conclusions: Surgical hackathons can result in significant improvements in confidence in approaching innovation, as well as raising awareness of important healthcare challenges. Future innovation events may build on this to continue to empower the future workforce to leverage technologies to tackle healthcare challenges such as sustainability.
Osteosarcomas of flat bones in adolescents and adults

F. Duffaud,L. Digue,M. Baciuchka-Palmaro,F. Volot,Catherine Perles‐Daniel,L. Garbe,R. Favre

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000115)88:2<324::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO;2-E

IF: 6.9209

2000-01-15

Cancer

Abstract:Osteosarcomas typically are long bone tumors and rarely affect the flat bones of the axial or appendicular skeleton.
Shared Learning Utilizing Digital Methods in Surgery to Enhance Transparency in Surgical Innovation: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Christin Hoffmann,Matthew Kobetic,Natasha Alford,Natalie Blencowe,Jozel Ramirez,Rhiannon Macefield,Jane M Blazeby,Kerry N L Avery,Shelley Potter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/37544

2022-09-08

Abstract:Background: Surgical innovation can lead to important improvements in patient outcomes. Currently, information and knowledge about novel procedures and devices are disseminated informally and in an unstandardized way (eg, through social media). This can lead to ineffective and inefficient knowledge sharing among surgeons, which can result in the harmful repetition of mistakes and delay in the uptake of promising innovation. Improvements are needed in the way that learning in surgical innovation is shared through the development of novel, real-time methods, informed by a contemporary and comprehensive investigation of existing methods. Objective: The aim of this scoping review is to explore the application of existing digital methods for training/education and feedback to surgeons in the context of performing invasive surgical procedures. This work will (1) summarize existing methods for shared learning in surgery and how they are characterized and operationalized, (2) examine the impact of their application, and (3) explore their benefits and barriers to implementation. The findings of this scoping review will inform the development of novel, real-time methods to optimize shared learning in surgical innovation. Methods: This study will adhere to the recommended guidelines for conducting scoping reviews. A total of 6 different searches will be conducted within multiple sources (2 electronic databases, journals, social media, gray literature, commercial websites, and snowball searches) to comprehensively identify relevant articles and data. Searches will be limited to articles published in the English language within the last 5 years. Wherever possible, a 2-stage study selection process will be followed whereby the eligibility of articles will be assessed through the title, abstract, and full-text screening independently by 2 reviewers. Inclusion criteria will be articles providing data on (1) fully qualified theater staff involved in performing invasive procedures, (2) one or more methods for shared learning (ie, digital means for training/education and feedback), and (3) qualitative or quantitative evaluations of this method. Data will be extracted (10% double data extraction by an independent reviewer) into a piloted proforma and analyzed using descriptive statistics, narrative summaries, and principles of thematic analysis. Results: The study commenced in October 2021 and is planned to be completed in 2023. To date, systematic searches were applied to 2 electronic databases (MEDLINE and Web of Science) and returned a total of 10,093 records. The results of this scoping review will be published as open access in a peer-reviewed journal. Conclusions: This scoping review of methods for shared learning in surgery is, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive and up-to-date investigation that maps current information on this topic. Ultimately, efficient and effective sharing of information and knowledge of novel procedures and devices has the potential to optimize the evaluation of early-phase surgical research and reduce harmful innovation. International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/37544.
Evolving robotic surgery training and improving patient safety, with the integration of novel technologies

I-Hsuan Alan Chen,Ahmed Ghazi,Ashwin Sridhar,Danail Stoyanov,Mark Slack,John D. Kelly,Justin W. Collins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03467-7

2020-11-06

World Journal of Urology

Abstract:Abstract Introduction Robot-assisted surgery is becoming increasingly adopted by multiple surgical specialties. There is evidence of inherent risks of utilising new technologies that are unfamiliar early in the learning curve. The development of standardised and validated training programmes is crucial to deliver safe introduction. In this review, we aim to evaluate the current evidence and opportunities to integrate novel technologies into modern digitalised robotic training curricula. Methods A systematic literature review of the current evidence for novel technologies in surgical training was conducted online and relevant publications and information were identified. Evaluation was made on how these technologies could further enable digitalisation of training. Results Overall, the quality of available studies was found to be low with current available evidence consisting largely of expert opinion, consensus statements and small qualitative studies. The review identified that there are several novel technologies already being utilised in robotic surgery training. There is also a trend towards standardised validated robotic training curricula. Currently, the majority of the validated curricula do not incorporate novel technologies and training is delivered with more traditional methods that includes centralisation of training services with wet laboratories that have access to cadavers and dedicated training robots. Conclusions Improvements to training standards and understanding performance data have good potential to significantly lower complications in patients. Digitalisation automates data collection and brings data together for analysis. Machine learning has potential to develop automated performance feedback for trainees. Digitalised training aims to build on the current gold standards and to further improve the ‘continuum of training’ by integrating PBP training, 3D-printed models, telementoring, telemetry and machine learning.

urology & nephrology
Utilising a modified accelerated Delphi process to develop a national multidisciplinary consensus on peri-operative optimisation of patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery

C. Cullinane,A. Edwards-Murphy,C. Kennedy,C. Toale,M. Al Azzawi,M. Davey,N. Donlon,S. Croghan,J. Elliott,C. Fleming

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2024.09.005

IF: 2.632

2024-10-13

The Surgeon

Abstract:Background In the last three decades, the worldwide prevalence of obesity has increased by threefold. Using a modified Delphi consensus technique, the Irish Surgical Research Collaborative (ISRC) aimed to formulate consensus guidelines on the peri-operative optimisation of patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery. Methods Subgroups within the ISRC were established to formulate consensus statements using a nominal group technique (NGT) to address the three domains of pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative care. Three Delphi rounds were circulated nationally to multidisciplinary members of the peri-operative team via electronic survey. Consensus was considered achieved for any statement with >80 % agreement. Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA). Results Following three Delphi rounds, a total of 94 statements centred around optimising peri-operative care for patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery reached consensus. Pre-operatively, access to prehabilitation, use of pre-operative risk stratification tools and strategies to reduce obesity-related co-morbidities were all deemed important along with nomination of a hospital obesity lead. Intra-operatively, the prioritised domains were involvement of consultant anaesthetist and surgeon for safe and considered patient positioning, utilisation of minimally invasive surgical techniques, adherence to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and surgical site infection prevention strategies as well as adoption of multimodal analgesia. Appropriate analgesia prescription, nutritional support, enhanced recovery after surgery and the role of physiotherapy were all deemed essential elements of post-operative care. Conclusion As a multidisciplinary peri-operative group, through Delphi consensus, we report agreed perioperative standards to optimise the perioperative care of patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery. This consensus can be utilised to standardise clinical practice and identify areas for quality improvement.

surgery
Digitalization in orthopaedics: a narrative review

Yasmin Youssef,Deana De Wet,David A. Back,Julian Scherer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1325423

IF: 1.8

2024-01-11

Frontiers in Surgery

Abstract:Advances in technology and digital tools like the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and sensors are shaping the field of orthopaedic surgery on all levels, from patient care to research and facilitation of logistic processes. Especially the COVID-19 pandemic, with the associated contact restrictions was an accelerator for the development and introduction of telemedical applications and digital alternatives to classical in-person patient care. Digital applications already used in orthopaedic surgery include telemedical support, online video consultations, monitoring of patients using wearables, smart devices, surgical navigation, robotic-assisted surgery, and applications of artificial intelligence in forms of medical image processing, three-dimensional (3D)-modelling, and simulations. In addition to that immersive technologies like virtual, augmented, and mixed reality are increasingly used in training but also rehabilitative and surgical settings. Digital advances can therefore increase the accessibility, efficiency and capabilities of orthopaedic services and facilitate more data-driven, personalized patient care, strengthening the self-responsibility of patients and supporting interdisciplinary healthcare providers to offer for the optimal care for their patients.

surgery
Supporting laparoscopic general surgery training with digital technology: The United Kingdom and Ireland paradigm

Gemma Humm,Rhiannon L Harries,Danail Stoyanov,Laurence B Lovat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01123-4

2021-03-08

Abstract:Surgical training in the UK and Ireland has faced challenges following the implementation of the European Working Time Directive and postgraduate training reform. The health services are undergoing a digital transformation; digital technology is remodelling the delivery of surgical care and surgical training. This review aims to critically evaluate key issues in laparoscopic general surgical training and the digital technology such as virtual and augmented reality, telementoring and automated workflow analysis and surgical skills assessment. We include pre-clinical, proof of concept research and commercial systems that are being developed to provide solutions. Digital surgical technology is evolving through interdisciplinary collaboration to provide widespread access to high-quality laparoscopic general surgery training and assessment. In the future this could lead to integrated, context-aware systems that support surgical teams in providing safer surgical care.
Digital mental health: challenges and next steps

Katharine A Smith,Charlotte Blease,Maria Faurholt-Jepsen,Joseph Firth,Tom Van Daele,Carmen Moreno,Per Carlbring,Ulrich W Ebner-Priemer,Nikolaos Koutsouleris,Heleen Riper,Stephane Mouchabac,John Torous,Andrea Cipriani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300670

2023-05-18

Evidence-Based Mental Health

Abstract:Digital innovations in mental health offer great potential, but present unique challenges. Using a consensus development panel approach, an expert, international, cross-disciplinary panel met to provide a framework to conceptualise digital mental health innovations, research into mechanisms and effectiveness and approaches for clinical implementation. Key questions and outputs from the group were agreed by consensus, and are presented and discussed in the text and supported by case examples in an accompanying appendix. A number of key themes emerged. (1) Digital approaches may work best across traditional diagnostic systems: we do not have effective ontologies of mental illness and transdiagnostic/symptom-based approaches may be more fruitful. (2) Approaches in clinical implementation of digital tools/interventions need to be creative and require organisational change: not only do clinicians and patients need training and education to be more confident and skilled in using digital technologies to support shared care decision-making, but traditional roles need to be extended, with clinicians working alongside digital navigators and non-clinicians who are delivering protocolised treatments. (3) Designing appropriate studies to measure the effectiveness of implementation is also key: including digital data raises unique ethical issues, and measurement of potential harms is only just beginning. (4) Accessibility and codesign are needed to ensure innovations are long lasting. (5) Standardised guidelines for reporting would ensure effective synthesis of the evidence to inform clinical implementation. COVID-19 and the transition to virtual consultations have shown us the potential for digital innovations to improve access and quality of care in mental health: now is the ideal time to act.

psychiatry
Qualitative and Economic Impact of Standardized and Digitalized Operation Room Processes in Obesity Surgery

Christian von Schudnat,Dirk Weyhe,Blanca de Miguel Molina,Klaus-Peter Schoeneberg,Jose Albors-Garrigos,Benjamin Lahmann,Alexandra Selzer,Ralf Weise

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06868-w

Abstract:Purpose: The introduction of innovative digital solutions in healthcare lags compared to other industries but promises high potential to create value in efficiency and quality. Increasing economic pressure forces hospitals to optimize operating room (OR) processes, in which such solutions might provide additional support. Materials and methods: This retrospective case-control and monocentric study investigated if digitalized and standardized intraoperative surgical workflows of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) have a significant impact on efficiency, quality, and economics. Logistic and linear regression models were used to apply propensity score matching (PSM) for efficiency and odds ratio for the quality analysis. Results: The study included 49 patients per group. The results demonstrate a significant increase in efficiency and cost-effectiveness in the treatment group. Length of stay (LoS) was 1.2 days less than in the control group (5.6 vs. 4.4). The mean of total OR and skin-to-skin time increased by 3.7% (142.00 vs. 136.80) and 8.5%, respectively (93.88 vs. 85.94). The standard deviation (SD) of total OR and skin-to-skin time decreased by 7.36 min (26.86 vs. 34.22) and 8.98 min (23.20 vs. 32.18) in the treatment group. The results of the odds ratio did not provide any conclusions on quality. Overall, costs were reduced by 318 € per patient and total revenue improved by 10,073 €. Conclusion: The implementation of digital workflow management systems in obesity surgery improves economic efficiency. Hospital management and payors should evaluate further support in research of the digitization of the OR, followed by reimbursement to increase and facilitate the accessibility to digital support systems.
Encouraging Digital Patient Portal Use in Ambulatory Surgery: A Mixed Method Research of Patients and Health Care Professionals Experiences and Perceptions

Melissa De Regge,Els Van Caelenberg,Nathalie Van Belle,Kristof Eeckloo,Marc Coppens

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2021.11.019

Abstract:Purpose: As more complex surgery is performed in 1-day admissions there is a growing demand for appropriate postoperative follow-up. A digital patient portal (DPP) is a promising tool to support this and increase patients' quality of recovery. However, both patients and health care professionals have not fully embraced this eHealth technology. This study investigates the extent to which a patient portal is used in a tertiary ambulatory surgical care unit and assesses usability, applicability and user-friendliness both for the patient and health care worker. Design: Mixed method research design combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Methods: Four hundred and fifteen patients undergoing knee arthroscopic surgery or endonasal sinus surgery were included. Quantitative log data from the patient platform, clinical outcome measures and a patient questionnaire were used. Additionally, qualitative data was collected through interviews (with patients, n = 13; involved caregivers and physicians, n = 7) and observations (first introduction to patient with platform and team meetings, n = 15). Findings: Forty percent of the included patients effectively used the patient platform (≥1 login). The patients mainly used the platform for gathering information; 62% of the active patients on the platform registered questionnaires initiated from the surgery center (eg, preoperative questionnaire) or diaries (e.g, daily follow-up using the Quality of Recovery Scale). Different barriers and facilitators toward DPP implementation were noted. Attention should be paid to the intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for using the portal and to the added value of the portal for the patient and health care professionals. Conclusions: Patients' perceptions of the DPP were positive and an increase in DPP use was observed during the study due to adjustments (eg, technical adjustments). However, a decline over time was noticed. The role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation of all included parties needs to be further corroborated.
Surgical Data Science: A Consensus Perspective

Lena Maier-Hein,Matthias Eisenmann,Carolin Feldmann,Hubertus Feussner,Germain Forestier,Stamatia Giannarou,Bernard Gibaud,Gregory D. Hager,Makoto Hashizume,Darko Katic,Hannes Kenngott,Ron Kikinis,Michael Kranzfelder,Anand Malpani,Keno März,Beat Müuller-Stich,Nassir Navab,Thomas Neumuth,Nicolas Padoy,Adrian Park,Carla Pugh,Nicolai Schoch,Danail Stoyanov,Russell Taylor,Martin Wagner,S. Swaroop Vedula,Pierre Jannin*,Stefanie Speidel*

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1806.03184

2018-06-08

Computers and Society

Abstract:Surgical data science is a scientific discipline with the objective of improving the quality of interventional healthcare and its value through capturing, organization, analysis, and modeling of data. The goal of the 1st workshop on Surgical Data Science was to bring together researchers working on diverse topics in surgical data science in order to discuss existing challenges, potential standards and new research directions in the field. Inspired by current open space and think tank formats, it was organized in June 2016 in Heidelberg. While the first day of the workshop, which was dominated by interactive sessions, was open to the public, the second day was reserved for a board meeting on which the information gathered on the public day was processed by (1) discussing remaining open issues, (2) deriving a joint definition for surgical data science and (3) proposing potential strategies for advancing the field. This document summarizes the key findings.
The Launch of International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

Jian-Ting Zhang,J. Turchi,Rakesh Kumar,W. Hong,G. Shaw,Dengshun Wang

2010-07-28

Abstract:With publication of this inaugural issue, we are pleased to announce the launching of the International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ISSN 2152-4114) with the enthusiastic support and participation of all editorial board members as well as fellow scientists in the life science community. International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology is a peer-reviewed and open access online journal with a mission to facilitate the rapid dissemination of novel discoveries and findings in biochemistry and molecular biology to the scientific community and to the public. The primary goal of this open access online journal is to publish original research findings in biochemistry and molecular biology as well as review articles and hypotheses. International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology will also keep all the traditional features of print journals such as continuous volume, issue, and page numbers. All manuscripts including reviews will be subjected to peer review and published online within 1 months of acceptance. With the explosion of information and rapid advancement of science and technology, traditional paper print publishing gradually becomes a limiting factor in dissemination of important discoveries and findings. Many equal quality studies could not be published due to limited print space despite adoption of simultaneous online publications by the traditional existing journals. International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology offers another venue of unlimited space for quick publication of these high quality studies. However, these advantages in publishing in International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology are not at the expense of the quality of the published work. All manuscripts submitted to the International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology will be subjected to rigorous peer review with the highest standard of academic excellence. With this successful launching of the International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, we face enormous challenges from competition with many other established journals in biochemistry and molecular biology. Taking advantage of the rapidness of publication with unlimited space as well as the enthusiastic support of our editorial board members, we believe that we will be able to overcome these challenges and make International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology a successful story. In closing, we would like to thank all our editorial board members, colleagues, and contributing authors for their support and participation. We also welcome any suggestions to improve this journal which likely will be a continuous evolutionary process. We look forward to working with everyone to better serve the scientific community and the public in information dissemination.

Adaptive frame/field motion compensated video coding

A Delphi consensus statement for digital surgery

Consensus for Operating Room Multimodal Data Management: Identifying Research Priorities for Data-Driven Surgery

Evolution of the digital operating room: the place of video technology in surgery

SAGES consensus recommendations on surgical video data use, structure, and exploration (for research in artificial intelligence, clinical quality improvement, and surgical education)

Defining digital surgery: a SAGES white paper

Surgical Sabermetrics

Intraoperative application of mixed and augmented reality for digital surgery: a systematic review of ethical issues

The Reputational Penalty for Aggressive Accounting: Earnings Restatements and Management Turnover

Fostering innovation and sustainable thinking in surgery: an evaluation of a surgical hackathon

Osteosarcomas of flat bones in adolescents and adults

Shared Learning Utilizing Digital Methods in Surgery to Enhance Transparency in Surgical Innovation: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Evolving robotic surgery training and improving patient safety, with the integration of novel technologies

Utilising a modified accelerated Delphi process to develop a national multidisciplinary consensus on peri-operative optimisation of patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery

Digitalization in orthopaedics: a narrative review

Supporting laparoscopic general surgery training with digital technology: The United Kingdom and Ireland paradigm

Digital mental health: challenges and next steps

Qualitative and Economic Impact of Standardized and Digitalized Operation Room Processes in Obesity Surgery

Encouraging Digital Patient Portal Use in Ambulatory Surgery: A Mixed Method Research of Patients and Health Care Professionals Experiences and Perceptions

Surgical Data Science: A Consensus Perspective

The Launch of International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.