Abstract:The cell cycle is an indispensable process in proliferation and development. Despite significant efforts, global quantification and physical understanding are still challenging. In this study, we explored the mechanisms of the Xenopus laevis embryonic cell cycle by quantifying the underlying landscape and flux. We uncovered the Mexican hat landscape of the Xenopus laevis embryonic cell cycle with several local basins and barriers on the oscillation path. The local basins characterize the different phases of the Xenopus laevis embryonic cell cycle, and the local barriers represent the checkpoints. The checkpoint mechanism of the cell cycle is revealed by the landscape basins and barriers. While landscape shape determines the stabilities of the states on the oscillation path, the curl flux force determines the stability of the cell cycle flow. Replication is fundamental for biology of living cells. We quantify the input energy (through the entropy production) as the thermodynamic requirement for initiation and sustainability of single cell life (cell cycle). Furthermore, we also quantify curl flux originated from the input energy as the dynamical requirement for the emergence of a new stable phase (cell cycle). This can provide a new quantitative insight for the origin of single cell life. In fact, the curl flux originated from the energy input or nutrition supply determines the speed and guarantees the progression of the cell cycle. The speed of the cell cycle is a hallmark of cancer. We characterized the quality of the cell cycle by the coherence time and found it is supported by the flux and energy cost. We are also able to quantify the degree of time irreversibility by the cross correlation function forward and backward in time from the stochastic traces in the simulation or experiments, providing a way for the quantification of the time irreversibility and the flux. Through global sensitivity analysis upon landscape and flux, we can identify the key elements for controlling the cell cycle speed. This can help to design an effective strategy for drug discovery against cancer.

Newton's cradle: Cell cycle regulation by two mutually inhibitory oscillators

Newton′s Cradle: Cell Cycle Regulation by Two Mutually Inhibitory Oscillators

From quiescence to proliferation: Cdk oscillations drive the mammalian cell cycle

The oscillation of mitotic kinase governs cell cycle latches in mammalian cells

Driving the cell cycle with a minimal CDK control network

Cell Cycle Control by a Minimal Cdk Network

The balance between cell cycle arrest and cell proliferation: control by the extracellular matrix and by contact inhibition

A conceptual framework for modeling a latching mechanism for cell cycle regulation

Quantitative Studies for Cell-Division Cycle Control

Global control of cell-cycle transcription by coupled CDK and network oscillators

Cell Cycle Synchronization by Nutrient Modulation

Linking cell division to cell growth in a spatiotemporal model of the cell cycle.

Extensive Regulation of Metabolism and Growth during the Cell Division Cycle

Normal and Aberrant Cell Cycles Characterized by a Continuous-Time Stochastic Boolean Model of Cell Cycle Regulation in Budding Yeast

Quantifying cell cycle regulation by tissue crowding

A model of replicating coupled oscillators generates naturally occurring cell networks

A Dynamic Gene Regulatory Network Model That Recovers the Cyclic Behavior of Arabidopsis thaliana Cell Cycle

Why minimal is not optimal: Driving the mammalian cell cycle—and drug discovery—with a physiologic CDK control network

Tension-clock control of human mitotic chromosome oscillations

A Mathematical Model for Cell Cycle Control: Graded Response or Quantized Response.

Exploring the Underlying Mechanisms of the Xenopus Laevis Embryonic Cell Cycle