Sonography-based multimodal information platform for identifying the surgical pathology of ductal carcinoma in situ
Huaiyu Wu,Yitao Jiang,Hongtian Tian,Xiuqin Ye,Chen Cui,Siyuan Shi,Ming Chen,Zhimin Ding,Shiyu Li,Zhibin Huang,Yuwei Luo,Quanzhou Peng,Jinfeng Xu,Fajin Dong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108039
IF: 6.1
2024-01-25
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Abstract:Background The risk of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) identified by biopsy often increases during surgery. Therefore, confirming the DCIS grade preoperatively is necessary for clinical decision-making. Purpose To train a three-classification deep learning (DL) model based on ultrasound (US), combining clinical data, mammography (MG), US, and core needle biopsy (CNB) pathology to predict low-grade DCIS, intermediate-to-high-grade DCIS, and upstaged DCIS. Materials and Methods Data of 733 patients with 754 DCIS cases confirmed by biopsy were retrospectively collected from May 2013 to June 2022 (N1), and other data (N2) were confirmed by biopsy as low-grade DCIS. The lesions were randomly divided into training (n=471), validation (n=142), and test (n = 141) sets to establish the DCIS-Net. Information on the DCIS-Net, clinical (age and sign), US (size, calcifications, type, breast imaging reporting and data system [BI-RADS]), MG (microcalcifications, BI-RADS), and CNB pathology (nuclear grade, architectural features, and immunohistochemistry) were collected. Logistic regression and random forest analyses were conducted to develop Multimodal DCIS-Net to calculate the specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, receiver operating characteristic curve, and area under the curve (AUC). Results In the test set of N1, the accuracy and AUC of the multimodal DCIS-Net were 0.752–0.766 and 0.859–0.907 in the three-classification task, respectively. The accuracy and AUC for discriminating DCIS from upstaged DCIS were 0.751–0.780 and 0.829–0.861, respectively. In the test set of N2, the accuracy and AUC of discriminating low-grade DCIS from upstaged low-grade DCIS were 0.769–0.987 and 0.818–0.939, respectively. DL was ranked from one to five in the importance of features in the multimodal-DCIS-Net. Conclusion By developing the DCIS-Net and integrating it with multimodal information, diagnosing low-grade DCIS, intermediate-to high-grade DCIS, and upstaged DCIS is possible. It can also be used to distinguish DCIS from upstaged DCIS and low-grade DCIS from upstaged low-grade DCIS, which could pave the way for the DCIS clinical workflow.
engineering, biomedical,computer science, interdisciplinary applications,medical informatics, theory & methods