Tissue Retrieval of Laparoscopically Excised Adnexal Specimens in Gynecologic Surgery: Posterior Culdotomy versus Abdominal Extraction

Toni S Horton,Hannah S Palin,Melinda H Chai,Emily C Craver,Aakriti R Carrubba
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2024.08.019
2024-09-04
Abstract:Objective: The objective of this study is to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in women undergoing removal of adnexal structures by either posterior culdotomy or abdominal extraction. Design: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted via medical record review. Demographic, clinical, and operative variables were abstracted from the medical records. Statistical analysis consisted of descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and multivariable logistic regression models. Setting: Single academic tertiary care center between 2010 and 2022. Participants: A total of 718 patients were identified and included in our analysis who underwent minimally invasive ovarian cystectomy or oophorectomy. Patients were excluded if they underwent concomitant hysterectomy. Interventions: Patients underwent minimally invasive oophorectomy or ovarian cystectomy, and specimens were extracted by either abdominal extraction or culdotomy extraction. Results: Of the 718 patients who met inclusion criteria, 127 (17.7%) underwent culdotomy extraction and 591 (82.3%) underwent abdominal extraction. The culdotomy extraction group had longer operative times (113 minutes vs 96 minutes, p<0.001) and higher estimated blood loss (25 milliliters vs 10 milliliters, p<0.001) compared to the abdominal extraction group. There were more malignancies in the culdotomy extraction than the abdominal extraction group (15.7% vs 8.1%, respectively, p<0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, those who underwent culdotomy extraction were more likely to have two or more clinic visits (OR 2.89; 95% CI, 1.66-5.03; p<0.001) and call or message the clinic (OR 2.08; 95% CI, 1.35-3.20; p<0.001). There were no incidences of cuff dehiscence, cuff cellulitis, or pelvic abscess in either group. Conclusion: Removal of adnexal specimens via abdominal port site or posterior culdotomy incision is a feasible option for specimen extraction and can be individualized based on patient and surgeon preference and patient factors. Those undergoing culdotomy extraction may require more preoperative counseling due to higher rate of postoperative messages seen in our cohort.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?