Abstract:Background: Arthroscopic lysis of adhesions is a treatment option for patients with painful, stiff knees as a result of arthrofibrosis following knee arthroplasty, in whom prior manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) has failed. Typically, nonoperative treatment in these patients has also failed, including aggressive physiotherapy, stretching, dynamic splinting, and various pain-management measures or medications. Range of motion in these patients is often suboptimal, and any gains in flexibility will likely have hit a plateau over many months. The goal of performing lysis of adhesions is to increase the range of motion in patients with knee stiffness following total knee arthroplasty, as well as to reduce pain and restore physiologic function of the knee, enabling activities of daily living. Description: This is a straightforward surgical technique that can be performed in a single stage. The preoperative range of motion is documented after induction of general anesthesia. The procedure begins with the establishment of standard medial and lateral parapatellar arthroscopic portals. A blunt trocar is introduced into the knee, and blunt, manual lysis of adhesions is performed in the suprapatellar pouch and the medial and lateral gutters with use of a sweeping motion after piercing and perforating the scarred adhesive bands or capsular tissue. Next, the arthroscope is inserted into the knee, and a diagnostic arthroscopy is performed. Bands of fibrous tissue are released and resected with use of electrocautery and a 4.0-mm arthroscopic shaver. Next, the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is visualized in full flexion. If PCL tightness is observed, the PCL can be released from its femoral origin until the flexion gap is increased. This portion of the procedure can include either partial or full release of the PCL, as indicated. Next, the arthroscope is removed and the ipsilateral hip is flexed to 90° for a standard MUA. Gentle force is applied to the proximal aspect of the tibia, and the knee is flexed. After completing the MUA, immediate post-intervention range of motion of the knee is documented, and the patient is provided with a continuous passive motion (CPM) machine set to the maximum flexion and extension achieved in the operating room. Alternatives: Nonoperative treatment of a stiff knee following total knee arthroplasty is well documented in the current literature. Range of motion has been shown to increase in patients undergoing proper pain management, aggressive physical therapy, and closed MUA in the acute postoperative setting. Additionally, more severe cases of established arthrofibrosis despite prior MUA can be treated with an open lysis of adhesions1-3. Rationale: Arthroscopic lysis of adhesions with PCL release versus resection has been well described previously. This procedure has been shown to benefit patients in whom initial nonoperative treatment has failed. Additionally, this procedure is not limited to the immediate acute postoperative period like standard MUA3. To our knowledge, no technique video has been published outlining arthroscopic lysis of adhesions for a stiff knee following total knee arthroplasty. Expected outcomes: This procedure has been shown to provide an immediate and lasting improvement in the flexion and extension arc of the knee, as well as improved functional outcomes. Patients should be educated that improvements gained in the operating room must be sustained through physical therapy. In a study of 32 patients who underwent arthroscopic lysis of adhesions for moderately severe arthrofibrosis following a total knee arthroplasty, Jerosch and Aldawoudy reported a mean postoperative flexion of 119° in the operating room and 97° at the time of the latest follow-up. Eight patients with extensor lag showed improvement from 27° to 4°. Average Knee Society scores improved from 70 points preoperatively to 86 points at the time of the latest follow-up4. Their article showed that arthroscopic treatment of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty is a safe and effective form of treatment. Important tips: Perform manual lysis of adhesions with a trocar prior to inserting the arthroscope in order to improve visualization and access.Utilize all portals and accessory portals interchangeably in order to improve access.Prescribe physical therapy with or without CPM machine immediately following surgery in order to maintain correction.Utilize pump inflow in order to help distend the tightened capsule.Protect the prosthetic surface from scratches during portal establishment.Loss of flexion implies scarring in the suprapatellar pouch and/or intercondylar notch, or PCL tightness.Loss of extension implies a tight posterior capsule, posterior osteophytes, or scarring of the PCL stump.A motorized shaver is the best tool for treatment of dense fibrous tissue, but be sure not to scratch metal total knee components. Acronyms and abbreviations: TKA = total knee arthroplastyROM = range of motionCT = computed tomographyMRI = magnetic resonance imagingESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rateCRP = C-reactive protein.

Surgically treated acute knee dislocations with knee stiffness perform equally as well as non-stiff knees when treated with arthroscopic arthrolysis

Clinical results after very early, early and late arthroscopic arthrolysis of the knee

Evaluation of Arthroscopic Arthrolysis in the Treatment of Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness

Long-Term Clinical Efficacy of Arthroscopy with Limited Incision in the Treatment of Knee Dislocation with Multiple Ligament Injuries

Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Adhesiolysis: A Case Series of 40 Patients With Postoperative Knee Stiffness

Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions for the Stiff Total Knee Arthroplasty

Anatomical repair and ligament bracing of Schenck III and IV knee joint dislocations leads to acceptable subjective and kinematic outcomes

Long-term Outcomes After Surgical Reconstruction of Multiligamentous Knee Injuries: Results at Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

Outcomes after multiligament knee injury worsen over time: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Early Compared with Delayed Reconstruction in Multiligament Knee Injury: A Retrospective Propensity Analysis

Differences in postoperative knee function based on concomitant treatment of lateral meniscal injury in the setting of primary ACL reconstruction

Intrinsic graft laxity variation with open kinetic chain exercise after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A non-randomized controlled study

Comparable Instrumented Knee Joint Laxity and Patient-Reported Outcomes After ACL Repair With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization or ACL Reconstruction: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Stability with a Constrained Posterior Stabilized Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Compromise Durability

Outcomes After Single-Stage Anatomic Multiligament Knee Reconstruction With Early Range of Motion in Adolescents

Repair versus Reconstruction of the Fibular Collateral Ligament and Posterolateral Corner in the Multiligament-Injured Knee

Short-term outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without lateral tenodesis or anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a retrospective cohort

[Effectiveness analysis of lateral condyle sliding osteotomy in total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of lateral femoral bowing deformity]

Percutaneous isometric reconstruction of medial collateral and posterior oblique ligaments offers similar outcomes to open techniques with reduced complication rates at a medium-term follow-up: A retrospective comparative study

Outcomes of arthroscopic arthrolysis for the post-traumatic elbow stiffness

Do Age and Timing Influence the Outcomes of Single‐stage Reconstruction of Multiple Ligament Knee Injuries? 5‐10 Years Follow Up