Steps to Writing a Career Development Award for a Surgeon-Scientists
Raymond A. Jean,Justin B. Dimick,Andrew M. Ibrahim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115806
IF: 3.125
2024-06-20
The American Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Many of the most novel and innovative scientific discoveries in medicine have resulted from tireless and dedicated efforts by surgeon-scientists. Using their unique exposure to the intricacies of disease and physiology, surgeons provide a unique perspective in advancing the science of clinical medicine. One mechanism by which departments can support and financially develop junior surgeons along the path of clinical research is through career development awards. Career development awards are a funding mechanism that provide support for clinician researchers within academic departments to develop a fundamental set of skills which can be applied to solving a clinical problem at hand. These are provided through several government agencies, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)1, 2, and surgical societies, such as the Society of Vascular Surgery Foundation (SVS Foundation) and the American College of Surgeons (ACS)3, 4. Our institution has mentored several surgeon-scientists in writing a career-development award and ultimately transitioning to independent funding. Herein we describe our four-step approach to writing a career development award (Figure 1) with focus on the health services research K-award mechanism described by AHRQ and NIH. The fundamental purpose of a career development award, and how it differs from other research grants, is that the primary goal is to fund the development of a candidate who will have an impact on their field. Central to this, then, is that the candidate solidifies a clear vision of the expert they seeks to become. 5 For example, this may mean a trauma surgeon who studies automotive telemetry for field triage, or a surgical oncologist focused on implementation science. To this end, we recommend that the first step for potential applicants is to begin the grant process with a thoughtful personal statement. A requirement for all federal career development awards, the personal statement or candidate background serves as an opportunity to express how the research question has developed significant meaning in the candidate's clinical and personal experiences, allowing them to explore the motivations behind the proposed field of investigation. Through the remainder of the statement, they go on to fill out a vision for the ultimate surgeon-scientist and research leader that he or she will become as a result of the support of the award. While this seems simple at face value, this introspection in composing the personal statement can be incredibly difficult. Because of the busy personal, clinical, and academic demands of surgical trainees and junior faculty, there realistically may be little time to sit with oneself and craft a vision of a future scientific career. One potential opportunity to begin this process is during non-clinical research fellowships or academic development time that have become increasingly common among trainees in academic surgical programs. In these cases, trainees often take one or more years away from full-time clinical duties to dedicate to clinical research, obtain advanced degrees, or engage in other professional development. Although remote from beginning the application process for a career development award, each of the authors was able to craft this vision of his ultimate professional goals in research fellowships during surgical residency. This process may involve intentionally interviewing faculty mentors and role-models to identify potential career paths that align with that vision. Developing this vision can become a process such that, when the time comes to draft a personal statement, the candidate has already gained clarity on the type of academic leader he or she aims to become. As a part of developing the candidate into a surgeon-scientist capable of solving important problems in clinical care, he or she must delineate a core set of skills that he or she must learn through the support of the award. Ideally, the candidate will identify approximately three skills that are necessary to solve each of the three specific aims of the proposed study. These skills are often in the form of content expertise or research techniques that will give the candidate the versatility and skillset to ultimately solve the research question and gain expertise in an important clinical problem. An understated, but important part of this lies in ensuring alignment with 1) the essentiality of these skills to each of the three specific study aims and 2) areas of expertise among the mentorship and advisory teams. Furthermore, many universities and national surgical socities have structured career development award workshops and seminars, where candidates can gain exposure to research methods and potential mentors. Synergy between the candidate's desired skillset and the mentors' expertise is an imperative component of the career development award. Th -Abstract Truncated-
surgery