Linking social capital and the political economy of substance treatment delivery: The case of recovery-oriented systems of care in Illinois

Carissa van den Berk-Clark,Emily Duncan,Ian Galbreath,Andrew Marino,Elizabeth A Baker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104561
Abstract:Background: Recovery-oriented systems of care have been a widely supported approach to transforming existing substance treatment programs across different states through developing recovery programs and interagency networks. However, little is known about the facilitators and barriers influencing their development and implementation. Methods: Qualitative study of 5 different recovery-oriented systems of care in Illinois. Nineteen respondents completed individual interviews. Results: A total of 124 codes and 2 themes were identified, reflecting constraints and opportunities. Theme 1 focused on how ROSC programs developed bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Theme 2 focused on the ROSC coordinator and lead agency's power and accountability. Conclusions: The roles of lead agencies and ROSC coordinators were highlighted in the development and implementation of ROSCs. ROSC membership structures allow for bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Still, additional technical support is needed to improve accountability, reduce power differentials and turf battles, and ensure greater participation among more diverse stakeholders.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?