[Reinterpretation of the hepatic abscess, a new dimension in abdominal digestive surgery].
F. Marini,S. Radin,P. Tenchini,G. Mangiante,F. Manganelli,F. Abrescia,R. Leoni,S. Massari,S. Seifert,A. Gatti
1989-04-01
Abstract:Pyogenic abscess of the liver is viewed here as a surgical disease, which appears to raise doubts as to its actual identity. Though located in a given abdominal organ, such abscesses find it hard to recognize this as their exclusive setting and attempt to shrug off these traditional confines. They aspire, rightly or wrongly perhaps, to symbolize a splanchnic context, though, in actual fact, the latter--at least for contingent, doctrinal reasons--is confined to the bipolar liver-bowel system. This context presents its candidacy as playing a leading role in a disease of such importance as to be regarded almost as the "Caudine Forks" of the very process of "surgical" dying. Liver abscess and multiorganic or multisystemic organ failure (MOF or MSOF) might thus be viewed as the two opposite poles (taxonomically definable) of a single clinical condition, which fans out over a broad area and for the most part is only barely known to us. Though is characterized by its abdominal location, it would be all too simple to define the condition as abdominal. In this case, in fact, the abdomen speaks an unusual language, not the habitual, traditional, "spatial" language of location, but the as yet uncertainly articulated "biological" or, why not, even "biosurgical" language of mediation. Is this then a turning point in the pathological field? No, if by that we mean a new concept of the problem. In effect, the concept dates back several centuries and, moreover, darries a heavy burden of responsibility, such as, for instance, having induced the Nobel Prize-winner Elie Metcknicoff (Metcknicoff E., The prolongation of life. London, Heinemann, 1907) to come up with theories appropriated and implemented surgically by Sir William Arbutnot Lane, gaining him nothing but sad notoriety (Gordon R., Great Medical Disasters, Hutchinson, London-Melbourne, 1983). "Concept" is a euphenism, and a more appropriate term might be simply "intuition". The real innovation lies in reviving this old intuition, reinterpreting it now, in fact, as a "concept". The code for this modern interpretation has barely been sketched out in its essentials, but is daily going from strength to strength.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)