Abstract:Regenerative medicine and tissue engineering are hindered by the lack of consistent measurements and standards for the mechanical characterization of tissue and scaffolds. Indentation methods for soft matter are favored because of their compatibility with small, arbitrarily shaped samples, but contact mechanics models required to interpret data are often inappropriate for soft, viscous materials. In this study, we demonstrate indentation experiments on a variety of human biopsies, animal tissue, and engineered scaffolds, and we explore the complexities of fitting analytical models to these data. Although objections exist to using Hertz contact models for soft, viscoelastic biological materials since soft matter violates their original assumptions, we demonstrate the experimental conditions that enable consistency and comparability (regardless of arguable misappropriation). Appropriate experimental conditions involving sample hydration, the indentation depth, and the ratio of the probe size to sample thickness enable repeatable metrics that are valuable when comparing synthetic scaffolds and host tissue, and bounds on these parameters are carefully described and discussed. We have also identified a reliable quasistatic parameter that can be derived from indentation data to help researchers compare results across materials and experiments. Although Hertz contact mechanics and linear viscoelastic models may constitute oversimplification for biological materials, the reporting of such simple metrics alongside more complex models is expected to support researchers in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine by providing consistency across efforts to characterize soft matter. Impact Statement To engineer replacement tissue requires a deep understanding of its biomechanical properties. Mesoscale indentation (between micron and millimeter length scales) is well-suited to characterize tissue and engineered replacements as it accommodates small, oddly shaped samples. However, it is easy to run afoul of the assumptions for common contact models when working with biological materials. In this study, we describe experimental procedures and modeling approaches that allow researchers to take advantage of indentation for biomechanical characterization while minimizing its weaknesses.

Evaluation of an Inverse Method for Quantifying Spatially Variable Mechanics

Assessing the Mechanical Properties of Anisotropic Soft Tissues Using Guided Wave Elastography: Inverse Method and Numerical Experiments

Combining Unique Planar Biaxial Testing with Full‐Field Thickness and Displacement Measurement for Spatial Characterization of Soft Tissues

An indentation-based approach to determine the elastic constants of soft anisotropic tissues

New methodology for mechanical characterization of human superficial facial tissue anisotropic behaviour in vivo

Mechanical characterization of soft viscoelastic gels via indentation and optimization-based inverse finite element analysis

Mechanical characterization of anisotropic planar biological soft tissues using large indentation: a computational feasibility study

Nondestructively Identifying the Mechanical Behavior of Soft Tissues Using Surface Deformation with an Explicit Inverse Approach

Role of anisotropic invariants in numerically modeling soft biological tissues as transversely isotropic hyperelastic materials: A comparative study

An Apparatus for Measuring Combined Shear-Tensile Loading in Fibrous Tissues Ex Vivo

An Investigation of How Specimen Dimensions Affect Biaxial Mechanical Characterizations with Cellscale BioTester and Constitutive Modeling of Porcine Tricuspid Valve Leaflets

Mechanical characterization of soft biomaterials: which time and spatial scale to choose?

A mesostructurally-based anisotropic continuum model for biological soft tissues--decoupled invariant formulation

Remote Spatially Variant Debiased Profiling of Cell and Tissue Mechanical Properties

Analytical and numerical analyses of the micromechanics of soft fibrous connective tissues

Digital image correlation and finite element modelling as a method to determine mechanical properties of human soft tissue in vivo

Local micromorphic non-affine anisotropy for materials incorporating elastically bonded fibers

In Vivo Measurement of the Mechanical Properties of Facial Soft Tissue Using a Bi-Layer Material Model

Mechanical Characterization by Mesoscale Indentation: Advantages and Pitfalls for Tissue and Scaffolds

Automated analysis of soft material microindentation.