Abstract:Purpose: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries cause changes in tibiofemoral joint kinematics and can lead to early onset of osteoarthritis (OA) despite surgical reconstruction. Changes in kinematics may alter the contact area (CA) between the femoral and tibial cartilage surfaces. Evaluations of the tibiofemoral CA in ACL injured individuals can help understand the mechanism behind cartilage degeneration seen after ACL injury and reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to determine the changes in tibiofemoral CA and their positions at the time of injury and after reconstruction. Methods: Subjects: Bilateral knee MRI scans of thirty healthy adults (15 males, age = 28.93 ± 7.81 years, BMI = 23.44 ± 2.74 kg/m2) with isolated unilateral ACL injuries were obtained within 6 months of their injury (i.e. baseline) prior to surgery and again at 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Fourteen healthy control subjects (10 males, age = 31.78 ± 4.80 years, BMI = 24.01 ± 2.26 kg/m2) with no history of knee injuries were recruited for comparison. Exclusion criteria included prior diagnosis of cartilage degeneration, inflammatory arthritis, or surgery in either knee. MRI Protocol: Subjects' knees were scanned with a 3 Tesla MRI scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with an 8-channel phased array knee coil (Invivo, Orlando, FL, USA). Sagittal T2 fast spin-echo (FSE) images with TR/TE = 4000/49.3 ms, slice thickness of 1.5 mm, field of view of 16 cm, 512 x 512 matrix size and echo train length 9 were obtained at extension, loaded axially with of 25% total body weight. Image Processing: Regions of interest were delineated in FSE images with an in-house Matlab program using a spline-based semi-automated segmentation algorithm. The midpoint between the tibial medial and lateral posterior cortical border was defined as the origin of the tibial coordinate system. Tibiofemoral cartilage CA was defined as the weight bearing regions on the tibial surface (Figure 1). Fluids indicated by hyperintensity and menisci were excluded along with areas close to the tibial spine. CA centroid position (CP) was defined as the geometric center of CA projected onto the axial plane. The flexion angle (FA) was defined by the angle between the lines through the midshaft of femur and tibia in the anteroposterior (AP) direction. A single observer processed all MR images and all measurements were taken in the extended position. Statistical Analysis: Reliability was measured using Intraclass Correlation coefficient (ICC) over three trials of 10 control subjects. Differences in mean CA and CP between groups and longitudinal changes from baseline to 1 year were measured with a Student's t-test. Significance was defined as P<0.05 for all analyses. Results: Reliability: The intra-operator ICC's were 0.922 and 0.942 for medial and lateral CA respectively, and 0.996 and 0.996 for medial and lateral CP. Contact Area: Medial CA was larger in injured knees compared to control knees at both time points and the difference reached significance at one year (P=0.036). For the medial CA, there were significant differences between contralateral and control knees at baseline and one year (P=0.043 and P=0.008). There was no significant difference between injured and contralateral knees at the two time points (Table 1). Centroid Position: CP along the AP direction was significantly more posterior for the injured knees compared to the contralateral knees at baseline for both medial and lateral regions (P=0.001 and p=0.043). No significant difference was found between injured and control knees or between contralateral and control knees (Table 2). Conclusions: ACL injured subjects had increased in the medial CA for both injured and contralateral knees compared to the controls. The difference between contralateral and control knees suggests that there may be inherent differences in knee kinematics of ACL injured patients. Lack of significant difference in CA between the two time points indicates that reconstruction did not restore CA and knee kinematics. Overall, the result of the study shows altered knee kinematics in those with ACL injuries. Increased CA may indicate changes in knee kinematics that could lead to ACL tears and OA. Acknowledgement: This study is supported by the grant NIH/NIAMS P50 AR060752.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

Kinematics of the anterior interval in individuals with knee osteoarthritis

Association between infrapatellar fat pad ultrasound elasticity and anterior knee pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis

The association between patella alignment and morphology and knee osteoarthritis

The coronal inclination of the medial tibial plateau affects coronal gait kinematics for varus osteoarthritic knees

Comparison of knee biomechanical characteristics during gait between patients with knee osteoarthritis and healthy individuals

Gender Differences in a Japanese Cohort

Examination of knee extensor and valgus moment arms of the patellar tendon in older individuals with and without knee osteoarthritis

In Vitro Kinematic Measurements of the Patellar Tendon in Two Different Types of Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasties

Effects of Varus of Knee Osteoarthritis on Patellar Position

The relationship between knee flexion excursion and mechanical stress during gait in medial knee osteoarthritis

Assessing knee joint biomechanics and trunk posture according to medial osteoarthritis severity

Characteristics of Acute Cartilage Response After Mechanical Loading in Patients with Early-Mild Knee Osteoarthritis

Evaluation of Tibiofemoral Cartilage, Contact Area Alterations in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injured Patients

In vivo kinematics during step ascent: Changes to the knee associated with osteoarthritis

Morphology Of Proximal Tibiofibular Joint, A New Risk Factor For Knee Osteoarthritis: A Radiological Study

New Variables for Measuring Joint Space Width to Evaluate Knee Osteoarthritis.

Does having shorter tibias increase the likelihood of developing knee osteoarthritis? An observational cross-sectional radiographic analysis

Influence of Pain on Knee Joint Movement and Moment during the Stance Phase in Patients with Severe Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study

KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS AND AGING: EVALUATION OF THE DIFFERENT MUSCLES OF THIGH

Inferior patellar mobility before and after knee arthroplasty: A comparison with healthy knees

Association Between the Morphology of Proximal Tibiofibular Joint and the Presence of Knee OA