Abstract:Creativity has long been thought as the ability to produce original,novel,flexible,and useful ideas that are free from established mental habit.It is considered as an aspect of the fully functioning personality.However,the existence of a relationship between "creativity" and unusual mental states has been speculated on for centuries.Highly creative people have demonstrated elevated risk for certain forms of psychopathology,especially mood disorders and schizophrenia spectrum disorders.Empirically examining the connection between creativity and psychopathology,and then exploring the nature as well as the cognitive and neural mechanisms of creativity are currently hot research topics.However,within the scientific domain,previous literature reviews came to quite different conclusions.Based on evidence from the behavioral,neuroimaging and genetics studies,we first review and comment on empirical researches and principal theoretical viewpoints on the connection between creativity and psychopathology,and then explore systematically the inner relationship between creativity and psychopathology.These results provide support for the notion that creativity and psychiatric disorders,particularly schizophrenia and bipolar disorder,share psychological attributes.However,whether and to what degree this is due to shared environment or genetics has not been assessed and the exact relationship between creativity and psychopathology is still a contentious issue.The main challenge in supporting this claim is that the statement itself is very general.In addition,there are a number of issues that contribute to unclarity within this literature.One issue is the way in which "creativity" and "mental illness" are discussed.Another issue that contributes to confusion in the field is the use of various "creativity measures" that measure different facets of creativity across studies.To foster examination of potential relationships between creativity and mental illness,it would be prudent to use a more systematic approach in which these constructs are made explicit in each study.Using multiple creativity measures in one study would provide data for convergent and discriminant validity between the facets of creativity measured in that study.Examining one facet of creativity in more than one mental illness or symptom type within one study could assist in determining specificity of that facet to a particular symptom type.The use of more sophisticated statistics that test the possibility of other types of associations between these constructs would allow better testing of more complex relationships.Future studies should strengthen theory integration and construction in the relation between creativity and psychopathology,use imaging genetics and big data,and carry out multi-faceted and multi-disciplinary research at the microcosmic,meso and macro levels as well as under the framework of "Genes-Brain-Environment-Behavior".In bringing these different perspectives together in one common forum,the hope is that this collective effort at addressing this intriguing question will lead to further constructive dialogue and debate in the scientific arena by adding more substance and rigor to discussions of the association between creativity and psychopathology.Meanwhile,we should improve more multicenter research on subclinical groups in a larger sample size,and longitudinal research designs should be encouraged.Such a research approach will be conducive to explore the inner relationship between creativity and psychopathology as well as its influencing factors and underlying biological mechanisms.If this more detailed approach is used to engage this question more systematically,we may finally be able to put this ageold broad question to rest and instead ask more targeted ones.

A genome-wide association study of occupational creativity and its relations with well-being and career success

Genome-wide Association Study of Creativity Reveals Genetic Overlap With Psychiatric Disorders, Risk Tolerance, and Risky Behaviors.

Genome-wide association analyses using machine learning-based phenotyping reveal genetic architecture of occupational creativity and overlap with psychiatric disorders

Creativity and Social Alienation: the Costs of Being Creative

Relationships Between Work Team Climate, Individual Motivation, and Creativity

Neural and genetic determinants of creativity

Genetic basis of job attainment characteristics and the genetic sharing with other SES indices and well-being

Genetic Influences on Creativity: an Exploration of Convergent and Divergent Thinking

Identification of first candidate genes for creativity: A pilot study

Neural, genetic, and cognitive signatures of creativity

A Unified Framework of the "Genes-Brain-environment-behavior" for the Relation Between Creativity and Psychopathology

Hope and Creative Self-Efficacy as Sequential Mediators in the Relationship Between Family Socioeconomic Status and Creativity

Genetics, leadership position, and well-being: An investigation with a large-scale GWAS

Radical and incremental creativity: associations with work performance and well-being

Evolution of genetic networks for human creativity

Connectome-Based Predictive Modeling of Creativity Anxiety

It is Also in Our Nature: Genetic Influences on Work Characteristics and in Explaining Their Relationships with Well‐being

Exploring the Associations Between Intrinsic Brain Connectivity and Creative Ability Using Functional Connectivity Strength and Connectome Analysis

Genetic basis of STEM occupational choice and regional economic performance: a UK biobank genome-wide association study

Relations of Creativity to the Interplay Between High-order Cognitive Functions: Behavioral and Neural Evidence

Linking Personality Traits and Job Satisfaction to Creativity