Mishearing, In Its Many Forms
J. Flaskerud
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2015.1076549
2016-03-03
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Abstract:We were traveling on a large sailing ship, visiting ports in Greece and Turkey. At some ports we could dock alongside a pier and, at others, we had to take a small boat, called a “tender,” to get to shore. Approaching the island of Patmos, I asked my traveling companion, “Do we have to take a tender to Patmos?” “It was tender,” he replied, “but it wasn’t pot roast,” referring to his dinner the previous evening. Another time, we were taking a walk in an upscale neighborhood and I pointed out some decorative urns outside the front gate: “Look at those huge urns!” He replied, “Are they ferns or dracaena?” In these instances of mishearing, we roared with laughter over the novel, yet plausible concoctions he had come up with in order to answer my questions. On other occasions, however, it is not funny when the person who misheard is convinced that he or she has heard correctly and insists, “I know what you said; I heard you!” In discussing a new phone app known as Waze to guide drivers around traffic jams, the person I was speaking to heard “Wave.” I kept saying Waze and she kept saying Wave; I kept saying “Z” and she would say, “I know, V,” until finally with great frustration, I said firmly and loudly, “Z, as in zebra! Not V as in victory!” However, before she would accept this, we had to look it up. In this kind of occurrence, the person who has misheard often comes up with common (or far-fetched) ideas to explain the mishearing: “she mumbled;” “there was too much background noise;” “Waze doesn’t make any sense.” As we age, more and more of our friends and colleagues experience hearing loss. The usual reaction is to deny it until persons in our environment become too frustrated with the communication gap that is developing and convince us to have our hearing checked. Even with this evidence in hand, many resist hearing