Correction to "A Note on Minimality of Positive Realizations"

L. Benvenuti,L. Farina
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2005.854607
2006-01-16
Abstract:Since the wrong inequality (4) is used also in the first part of the proof of Theorem 1 in [1], neither the global asymptotic stability nor the uniqueness of the equilibrium point was proved in [1]. Summarizing the above, Theorem 1 does not always correctly hold. There are two possible ways of modifying the statement of the theorem to the correct version. One is to add the following condition to the existing two conditions. 3) kW k2 kW k2. The other is to change the definition of kW k2 as follows:
What problem does this paper attempt to address?