Abstract:Background: A prior study suggested that implementing a cut-off value of ≤30 mm for a short cervical length (CL) could potentially introduce selection bias and alter the distribution of CL measurements. As such, the objective of this study is to evaluate how CL distribution and incidence of short CL are affected when using different cut-off values for a short CL. Study design: This is a secondary analysis of the Quadruple P (QP) Screening study; a prospective cohort study that included low-risk patients with singleton pregnancies undergoing fetal anomaly scan at 18-22 weeks of gestation, including a CL measurement. Patients with a short cervix, defined as ≤35 mm, were subsequently counseled for the QP trial; a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing progesterone to cervical pessary for the prevention of preterm birth. If participation to the RCT was refused, patients with a CL ≤25 mm were advised to use progestogen. The primary objective of this current study was to assess the normal distribution of CL across the entire cohort and to assess the incidence of short CL when using the cut-off values of ≤35 and ≤25 mm. Normal distributions for CL were simulated based on mean and standard deviation(SD) of the original data. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate the distribution of the CL measurements. Moreover, to evaluate the motives behind ultrasound measurements around the cut-off value, sonographers were asked to fill out a qualitative questionnaire. Results: The total cohort included 19.171 eligible participants who underwent CL measurement, with a mean CL of 43.9 mm (±8.1 SD). The distribution of all CL observed measurements deviated significantly from the normal distribution (p < 0.001). A total of 1.852 (9.7%) patients had short CL ≤35 mm, which was significantly lower than expected when compared to the simulated normal distribution (n = 2.661, 13.9%; p < 0.001). The incidence of short CL ≤25 mm in our cohort statistically differed from the simulated normal distribution (238, 1.2% vs 177, 0.9%; p=0.003). When comparing our data to the simulated normal distribution, the difference in distributions is most pronounced when examining the difference between 35 and 36 mm. Results of the questionnaire reveal sonographers claimed not to be influenced by a cut-off value for study participation or progesterone treatment. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that using any cut-off value for a short CL influences the incidence and distribution of CL. When using a cut-off value of ≤35 mm for study inclusion, the incidence of measurements of a short CL is lower than the anticipated incidence compared to a normal distribution. However, when using a cut-off value of ≤25 mm for progesterone treatment, the frequency of CL measurements is higher than expected below this threshold compared to a normal distribution. This study highlights the risk of introducing selection bias, most likely unintentionally, when cut-off values for short CL are used, regardless of the specific value chosen. Therefore healthcare providers should measure the CL with caution if essential decisions depend on a specific cut-off value.

The impact of cut-off values on the prevalence of short cervical length in pregnancy

Midtrimester Cervical Length in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women for the Prediction of Spontaneous Preterm Birth: Should We Consider a New Definition of Short Cervix?

The perceptions of obstetric care providers about cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention

Longitudinal Change in Cervical Length Measured after Prophylactic Cerclage in Predicting Spontaneous Preterm Birth.

Implementation of universal screening for preterm delivery by mid-trimester cervical-length measurement

The clinical utility of ongoing sonographic cervix length surveillance in pregnancies prescribed vaginal progesterone therapy

Association Between Mid-Trimester Cervical Length And Risk Of Spontaneous Preterm Birth Is Modified By A Prior Cervical Excisional Procedure

Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Ultrasound-Indicated Cerclage and Identification the Influence Factors for Predicting Preterm Birth: A Retrospective Study of 87 Cases

Impact of cervical length on preterm birth in northern China: a prospective cohort study.

Screening vs. no screening for preterm delivery in low-risk singleton pregnancies: comparison by propensity score analysis

[Predictive Value of Cervical Length by Transvaginal Sonography for Preterm Pregnancy During Mid- and Late-Trimester of Pregnancy].

Evaluation of additive effect of quantitative fetal fibronectin to cervical length for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth among asymptomatic high-risk women

Cervical Length at 28-32 Weeks of Gestation Predicts Preterm Birth

Revisions to mid-pregnancy cervical length reference range for preterm birth screening among singleton pregnancies in Taiwan - 10 years' experiences

A new screening of preterm birth in gestation with short cervix after pessary plus progesterone

Vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth in pregnant women with a sonographic short cervix: clinical and public health implications

Cervical length changes in singleton pregnancies following history-indicated cerclage and their impact on preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation

Impact of bias in crown-rump length measurement at first-trimester screening for trisomy 21

Consecutive Measurement of Cervical Length During Uncomplicated Pregnancy Through Transvaginal Ultrasound

OC17.04: QP screening study: maternal risk factors associated with a short mid‐pregnancy cervical length in singletons

Mid-Trimester Cervical Consistency Index and Cervical Length to Predict Spontaneous Preterm Birth in a High-Risk Population