The researcher's guide to selecting biomarkers in mental health studies
Josine E Verhoeven,Owen M Wolkowitz,Isaac Barr Satz,Quinn Conklin,Femke Lamers,Catharina Lavebratt,Jue Lin,Daniel Lindqvist,Stefanie E Mayer,Philippe A Melas,Yuri Milaneschi,Martin Picard,Ryan Rampersaud,Natalie Rasgon,Kathryn Ridout,Gustav Söderberg Veibäck,Caroline Trumpff,Audrey R Tyrka,Kathleen Watson,Gwyneth Winnie Y Wu,Ruoting Yang,Anthony S Zannas,Laura K M Han,Kristoffer N T Månsson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202300246
BioEssays
Abstract:Clinical mental health researchers may understandably struggle with how to incorporate biological assessments in clinical research. The options are numerous and are described in a vast and complex body of literature. Here we provide guidelines to assist mental health researchers seeking to include biological measures in their studies. Apart from a focus on behavioral outcomes as measured via interviews or questionnaires, we advocate for a focus on biological pathways in clinical trials and epidemiological studies that may help clarify pathophysiology and mechanisms of action, delineate biological subgroups of participants, mediate treatment effects, and inform personalized treatment strategies. With this paper we aim to bridge the gap between clinical and biological mental health research by (1) discussing the clinical relevance, measurement reliability, and feasibility of relevant peripheral biomarkers; (2) addressing five types of biological tissues, namely blood, saliva, urine, stool and hair; and (3) providing information on how to control sources of measurement variability.