Abstract:Background: Nowadays most countries in Europe have established their own nutrient recommendations to assess the adequacy of dietary intakes and to plan desirable dietary intakes. As yet there is no standard approach for deriving nutrient recommendations, they may vary from country to country. This results in different national recommendations causing confusion for policy-makers, health professionals, industry, and consumers within Europe. EURRECA (EURopean micronutrient RECommendations Aligned) is a network of excellence funded by the European Commission (EC), and established to identify and address the problem of differences between countries in micronutrient recommendations. The objective of this paper is to give an overview of the available micronutrient recommendations in Europe, and to provide information on their origin, concepts and definitions. Furthermore this paper aims to illustrate the diversity in European recommendations on vitamin A and vitamin D, and to explore differences and commonalities in approaches that could possibly explain variations observed. Methods: A questionnaire was developed to get information on the process of establishing micronutrient recommendations. These questionnaires were sent to key informants in the field of micronutrient recommendations to cover all European countries/regions. Also the latest reports on nutrient recommendations in Europe were collected. Standardisation procedures were defined to enable comparison of the recommendations. Recommendations for vitamin A and vitamin D were compared per sex at the ages 3, 9 months and 5, 10, 15, 25, 50 and 70 years. Information extracted from the questionnaires and reports was compared focusing on: (1) The concept of recommendation (recommended daily allowance (RDA), adequate intake (AI) or acceptable range), (2) The year of publication of the report (proxy for available evidence), (3) Population groups defined, (4) Other methodological issues such as selected criteria of adequacy, the type of evidence used, and assumptions made. Results: Twenty-two countries, the World Health Organization (WHO)/the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the EC have their own reports on nutrient recommendations. Thirteen countries based their micronutrient recommendations on those from other countries or organisations. Five countries, WHO/FAO and the EC defined their own recommendations. The DACH-countries (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) as well as the Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Iceland) cooperated in setting recommendations. Greece and Portugal use the EC and the WHO/FAO recommendations, respectively and Slovenia adopted the recommendations from the DACH-countries. Rather than by concepts, definitions, and defined population groups, variability appears to emerge from differences in criteria for adequacy, assumptions made and type of evidence used to establish micronutrient recommendations. Discussion: The large variation in current micronutrient recommendations for population groups as illustrated for vitamin A and vitamin D strengthens the need for guidance on setting evidence based, up-to-date European recommendations. Differences in endpoints, type of evidence used to set recommendations, experts' opinions and assumptions are all likely to contribute to the identified variation. So far, background information was not sufficient transparent to disentangle the relative contribution of these different aspects. Conclusion: EURRECA has an excellent opportunity to develop tools to improve transparency on the approaches used in setting micronutrient recommendations, including the selection of criteria for adequacy, weighing of evidence, and interpretation of data.

[Maximum levels of vitamins and minerals in fortified food and food supplements in the European Union]

Safe addition of vitamins and minerals to foods: setting maximum levels for fortification in the Netherlands

Current micronutrient recommendations in Europe: towards understanding their differences and similarities

Strategies To Improve Vitamin D Status In Northern European Children: Exploring The Merits Of Vitamin D Fortification And Supplementation

Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin E

Impact of maximum levels in European legislation on exposure of mycotoxins in dried products: case of aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A in nuts and dried fruits

The Use of Multivitamin/Multimineral Supplements: A Modified Delphi Consensus Panel Report

Regulatory and Policy-Related Aspects of Calcium Fortification of Foods. Implications for Implementing National Strategies of Calcium Fortification

Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for iron

The role of fortified foods and nutritional supplements in increasing vitamin D intake in Irish preschool children

The global regulatory landscape regarding micronutrient fortification of condiments and seasonings

Projected Prevalence of Inadequate Nutrient Intakes in Europe

Comparative study on the model of micronutrients maximum fortification level

Food Supplements Marketed Worldwide: A Comparative Analysis Between the European and the U.S. Regulatory Frameworks

Vitamin Intake from Food Supplements in a German Cohort - Is there a Risk of Excessive Intake?

Reasons for raising the maximum acceptable daily intake of EDTA and the benefits for iron fortification of foods for children 6-24 months of age

Bioaccessibility of vitamin A, vitamin C and folic acid from dietary supplements, fortified food and infant formula

Vitamin D fortification of foods – sensory, acceptability, cost, and public acceptance considerations

The prevalence of inadequate micronutrient intakes and risk of excessive intakes in adults in Ireland: Findings from the National Adult Nutrition Survey II

Rationale and Plan for Vitamin D Food Fortification: A Review and Guidance Paper

The Maximal Amount of Dietary Α-Tocopherol Intake in U.S. Adults (NHANES 2001–2002)