Smoking uptake amongst adolescents in Social Housing Australia

Ankur Singh,Erika Martino,Adelle Mansour,Rebecca Bentley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae207
2024-09-05
Abstract:Introduction: Australia's limited social housing has created geographically concentrated locales of poverty with high smoking rates. The impact of social housing on smoking initiation among adolescent residents is unknown, despite adolescence being a critical period for smoking prevention. We examine the relationship between social housing residency and smoking initiation amongst adolescents to quantify the likelihood of smoking uptake amongst social housing residents compared to a similar cohort in other tenures, accounting for socio-economic factors and household exposure to smoking. Methods: We analysed data on 15-18-year-old adolescents (n=3,132) from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey (2001-2019). We applied inverse probability treatment weights to maximise exchangeability between social housing tenants and their counterparts in other tenures. We quantified the risk of smoking five years after exposure measurement among those in social housing on both an absolute and relative scale. Baseline covariates included household income, age at study entry, sex, family type, smoking at baseline, highest household education and, household exposure to smoking. Results: Adolescent residents in social housing had a 17% greater risk of smoking five years after baseline measurement than their counterparts in all other tenures (ATE: 0.165, 95%CI: 0.02-0.31). On the relative scale those in social housing had 1.80 times (95% CI: 0.95-2.66) higher risk of being a smoker than those in other tenures. Conclusions: Adolescents residing in social housing have a higher risk of becoming smokers as young adults than their counterparts in other tenures, irrespective of smoking exposure in their own homes. Implications: This study investigates the impact of social housing on smoking initiation among adolescents, revealing that those residing in social housing have a higher risk of becoming smokers in young adulthood, independent of smoking exposure at home. The research highlights the contribution of social housing to ongoing disparities in smoking rates in Australia and emphasize the need to further understand and review social housing provision from the perspective of its consequences on health. Moreover, the results advocate for comprehensive policies that extend beyond individualized harm reduction strategies to promote social inclusion and address health inequalities associated with smoking in adolescents.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?