Early Adjuvant Chemotherapy Improves Survival in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Shane Kronstedt,Gal Saffati,David E Hinojosa-Gonzalez,Sai Krishnaraya Doppalapudi,Joseph Boyle,Kevin Chua,Thomas L Jang,Giovanni E Cacciamani,Saum Ghodoussipour
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.08.067
IF: 2.633
2024-09-02
Urology
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate whether earlier administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) can significantly augment survival rates in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Web of Science library databases for original articles that looked at timing to AC after radical cystectomy. Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins I2%, with values over 50% considered heterogeneous and analyzed with a random effects model; otherwise, a fixed effects model was used. Studies were stratified based on the cutoff time used for administering AC. Two primary cutoffs were employed: 45 days and 90 days. Immediate AC was defined as chemotherapy administered before the predefined cutoff, while delayed AC was defined as chemotherapy administered after this cutoff. Comparisons were made between immediate versus delayed. Results: A total of 5 studies were included. Overall survival (OS) was reported in all of the studies. The meta-analysis showed that immediate AC significantly improved OS, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.20 [1.06, 1.36], P=.004. When stratifying by the timing of therapy, starting chemotherapy within 45 days resulted in a greater improvement in survival (HR 1.27 [1.02, 1.59], P=.03) compared to starting within 90 days (HR 1.17 [1.00, 1.36], P=.04). Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis emphasize that the timing of AC post-radical cystectomy significantly influences survival outcomes in patients with MIBC. The benefits of early AC initiation underscore its potential in mitigating disease progression and improving long-term survival rates.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?