Prof. V. F. Boldyrev

B. Uvarov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/179758A0

IF: 64.8

1957-04-01

Nature

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comparison of Treatment Outcome of the Effectiveness of Isometric Exercises as Compared to General Exercises with Cervical Spine Mobilization in The Management of Chronic Non Specific Neck Pain

Majid Hayat,Rafia Siddique,Aliya Basharat,Iqra Waheed,Syeda Umme Rubab,Haya Naqvi,Hamna Nadeem,Sadaqat Hussain,Abdul Shakir,Faiqa Haq,Muskan Awais,Kausar Kalsoom,Arzanish Pria,Rimsha Ijaz,Fatima Javaid,Sana Gohar,Ayesha Hamid,Laiba Zahid,Sana Tahir,Sania Maqbool

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0380

2023-12-23

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the “effectiveness of isometric exercises as compared to general exercises along with cervical spinal mobilization to reduce pain, disability and to increase range of motion in chronic non-specific neck pain”For this randomized controlled experiment total 32 patients (16 in each group) with chronic non-specific neck pain were recruited from physiotherapy Ward Mayo Hospital Lahore, Department of Physiotherapy King Edward Medical University Lahore between October, 2019 and March, 2020. Simple randomization method was used to assign participants into isometric exercise group and general exercise with cervical spine mobilization group. The isometric exercise group performed exercises for neck muscle groups with a rubber band and general exercises with cervical mobilization group performed active range of movement exercises for all neck movements. Patients in both groups received 4 supervised treatment sessions per week for 6 weeks. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Neck disability index Questionnaire and goniometer were used to assess pain, disability and neck range of movements at baseline and after 6 weeks.Both interventions showed statistically significant improvements in pain, function and range of movement p = 0.001for isometric exercise group, p = 0.05 for general exercises group and p= <0.001 for range of movement. However, mean improvements in post intervention VAS score and Neck disability index Questionnaire score was better in isometric exercises group as compared to general exercise group. In conclusion, both interventions are effective in the treatment of chronic non- specific neck pain however; isometric exercises are clinically more effective than general exercises with cervical spine mobilization.
Effects of Integrating Jaw Opening and Closing Movements with Active Neck Exercises in the Management of Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Saeed Akhter,Hamayun Zafar,Ashfaq Ahmad,Waqas Ahmed Farooqui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091437

2024-09-03

Abstract:Background and Objectives: It has been seen that jaw opening is associated with neck extension and jaw closing is associated with neck flexion. This natural association between the jaw and neck can be used as a novel approach to treat chronic non-specific neck pain, although the effects of this concept have never been previously evaluated as a treatment strategy. This article intends to study the effects of integrating jaw opening and closing movements along with active neck exercises versus active neck exercises alone in the management of chronic non-specific neck pain. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 patients, aged 20 to 50, with chronic non-specific neck pain were included in a double-blind randomized controlled trial, conducted at the Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Karachi, Pakistan from 2018 to 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A patients were assigned jaw movements with active neck exercises, while Group B patients were assigned only active neck exercises. Both groups were assigned isometric strengthening exercises and self-resisted strengthening exercises for cervical spine muscles as a home plan. The study used various outcome measures, including the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), neck disability index (NDI), neck flexion endurance (NFE), neck extension endurance (NEE), the neck proprioception error (NPE): neck flexion proprioception error (NFPE), neck extension proprioception error (NEPE), neck right rotation proprioception error (NRRPE), and neck left rotation proprioception error (NLRPE), with measurements taken at week 1 and week 6, respectively; the mean differences between the groups were measured using a two-way repeated ANOVA. Results: The experimental group showed better improvements compared to the control group, NPRS (73%), NDI (57%), NFE (152%), NEE (83%), NFPE (58%), NEPE (65%), NRRPE (65%), and NLRPE (62%), with a significant difference (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Active neck extension and flexion movements combined with jaw opening and closing are more effective in reducing pain and disability, improving neck muscles endurance and normalizing neck proprioception in patients with chronic neck pain.
Disseminated intravascular coagulation in multiorgan donors.

S. Gil‐Vernet,F. Martínez-Brotons,C. González,P. Doménech,M. Carreras

IF: 1.014

1992-02-01

Transplantation Proceedings

Abstract:
Effect of Global Posture Re-Education Versus Static Stretching on Pain, Range of Motion And Quality of Life in Post-Menopausal Women with Chronic Neck Pain

Hina Anum,Naveed Anwar,Sana Tauqeer,Kehkhshan Khalid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v72i1.6287

2022-03-01

Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal

Abstract:Objective: To compare the effects of global posture re-education and static stretching on pain, range of motion and disability in post-menopausal women with chronic neck pain. Study Design: A quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Sheikh Zayed hospital Rahim Yar Khan, from Jun to Dec 2020. Methodology: A total of 36 female patients between 45-65 years of age were included in the study. Patients who had received physiotherapy or manual therapy treatment for neck pain in the previous six months or had any tumour infection were excluded. There were two groups, the global posture re-education group (n=18) performed muscle chain stretching, while the static stretching group (n=18) performed conventional static muscle stretching. Visual analogue scale, neck disability index and goniometer were used for outcome measurement. Results: The results showed significant improvement in visual analogue scale score, neck disability index, flexion and extension range at four weeks and three months follow up (p 0.05). Conclusion: There was a significant difference in pain, function and disability in both groups, but the global posture reeducation group showed a maximum decrease in pain and disability and gain in ROM as compared to the static stretching group.
Investigation of the effectiveness of neck stabilization exercises in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized, single-blind clinical, controlled study

Hüseyin Aydoğmuş,Özlem Şenocak,Serhat Metin Döner,Pembe Keskinoğlu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2022.8481

2022-08-25

Abstract:Objectives: This study aims to compare the efficacy of neck stabilization exercises versus a conventional exercise program on pain, range of motion, disability, and depression in patients with chronic neck pain. Patients and methods: This prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study included 60 patients with chronic neck pain, 58 (21 males, 37 females; mean age: 36.7±8.5 years; range, 18 to 55 years) of whom completed the study. The patients were randomized into two groups. Patients in one group were given neck stabilization exercises, while the patients in the other group were given conventional neck exercises. Neck pain due to activities of daily living (Visual Analog Scale), neck range of motion in sagittal, transverse, and frontal planes, disability (Neck Disability Index), and depression (Beck Depression Inventory) were evaluated at the beginning, at the end of the treatment, and at the first and third months after the end of treatment. Results: Significant improvement was achieved in both groups in terms of Visual Analog Scale, Neck Disability Index, neck range of motion in the sagittal, transverse, and frontal planes, and Beck Depression Inventory compared to the beginning of treatment (p<0.05). In the stabilization exercise group, statistically significant improvement was found in the range of motion of the neck in the transverse plane (p<0.05). Conclusion: Stabilization exercise programs, which show their effect by maintaining segmental stabilization, postural control, and balance between the superficial and deep muscles of the neck region, contribute to reduced pain in daily activities and improved function similar to conventional exercise programs.
Effectiveness of Physical Exercise on Pain, Disability, Job Stress, and Quality of Life in Office Workers with Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Yousef M. Alshehre,Shahul Hameed Pakkir Mohamed,Gopal Nambi,Sattam M. Almutairi,Ahmed A. Alharazi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162286

2023-08-15

Health Care

Abstract:Neck pain is a widespread medical condition among office workers worldwide. This study aimed to compare physical exercises, including basic body awareness, neck-specific training exercises and ergonomic modifications, and ergonomic modifications alone in the management of chronic non-specific neck pain (NSNP) among office workers. Sixty participants were randomly allocated to an experimental group (physical exercises and ergonomic modifications) or a control group (ergonomic modifications) and received the intervention two times a week for eight weeks. The Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Neck Disability Index, Health and Safety Stress Tool, and Short Form Health Survey-36 were used to measure pain, disability, job stress, and quality of life at baseline, and at weeks 4 and 8 of the study period. A repeated measure ANOVA was used to determine the within-group significant differences and an independent t-test was utilized to compare group differences. The baseline data of the experimental and control groups showed no significant difference (p ≥ 0.05). The 2 × 3 mixed models ANOVA showed a significant difference in pain intensity (p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.042), functional disability (p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.052), work-related stress (p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.036), and QoL (p = 0.012, ηp2 = 0.025). Four weeks post-intervention, the experimental group showed significant changes in primary (pain intensity and disability) (1.9; 95% confidence interval 1.65–2.14) and secondary (quality of life and work-related stress) outcomes (p < 0.001). The same gradual improvement in these variables was observed in the 8-week follow-up (p < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in clinical outcomes following the application of physical exercises with ergonomic modifications for chronic NSNP among office workers. This is significant for office workers because it suggests the importance of incorporating physical exercises into their daily routine and making ergonomic changes to their workspaces.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Effects of clinical pilates exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain: a randomized clinical trial

Gonca Sahiner Picak,Sevgi Sevi Yesilyaprak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-022-03101-y

Abstract:Background: Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal problem in adults. Clinical pilates exercises can be beneficial managing the pain and improving the risk factors. Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of clinical pilates exercises on pain and disability, deep neck flexor endurance (DNFE), posture, cervical range of motion (CROM), and proprioception in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain. Methods: Fifty patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain were randomized into two groups. The clinical pilates exercise group (CPEG) received clinical pilates exercises for 6 weeks. The control group (CG) received posture education. Pain and disability, DNFE, forward head angle (FHA) and forward shoulder angle (FSA) degrees, CROM, and joint position error (JPE) were measured before and after 6 weeks. Results: Clinical pilates exercises improved pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), DNFE, posture, CROM (except extension), and JPE (p < 0.05). We found significant differences between CPEG and CG in the comparisons for the change of pain, NDI, DNFE, FSA, CROM (except extension), and JPE (except left rotation) (p < 0.05). NDI, FSA, and rotational JPE also improved in CG (p < 0.05). However, these improvements were significantly better in CPEG than CG (p < 0.05) except JPE in left rotation (p = 0.118). Conclusion: In patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain, clinical pilates exercise is a safe and effective method to improve pain and disability, DNFE, posture, ROM, and proprioception. Clinical trial registration: NCT03782584 retrospectively registered December 20 2018.
Effect of post-isometric relaxation versus myofascial release therapy on pain, functional disability, rom and qol in the management of non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Zainab Khalid Khan,Syed Imran Ahmed,Aftab Ahmed Mirza Baig,Waqas Ahmed Farooqui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05516-1

IF: 2.562

2022-06-15

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract:Non-specific neck pain is the most prevailing musculoskeletal disorder which has a large socioeconomic burden worldwide. It is associated with poor posture and neck strain which may lead to pain and restricted mobility. Physical therapists treat such patients through several means. Post isometric relaxation and Myofascial release therapy are used in clinical practice with little evidence to be firmed appropriately. So, this study was conducted to explore the effect of Post-isometric relaxation in comparison to Myofascial release therapy for patients having non-specific neck pain.

orthopedics,rheumatology
Effects of non-surgical decompression therapy in addition to routine physical therapy on pain, range of motion, endurance, functional disability and quality of life versus routine physical therapy alone in patients with lumbar radiculopathy; a randomized controlled trial

Fareeha Amjad,Mohammad A. Mohseni-Bandpei,Syed Amir Gilani,Ashfaq Ahmad,Asif Hanif

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05196-x

IF: 2.562

2022-03-16

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract:Abstract Background Lumbar radiculopathy is an extensively common complaint reported by patients of low back pain (LBP), resulting in several impairments. A comparatively novel technique, non-surgical spinal decompression (NSD), is introduced, which uses a sensitive computerized feedback mechanism and decompresses the spinal nerve roots through segmental distraction. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of NSD therapy in addition to routine physical therapy on pain, lumbar range of motion (ROM), functional disability, back muscle endurance (BME), and quality of life (QOL) in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. Methods A total of sixty patients with lumbar radiculopathy were randomly allocated into two groups, an experimental ( n = 30) and a control ( n = 30) group, through a computer-generated random number table. Baseline values were recorded before providing any treatment by using a visual analogue scale (VAS), Urdu version of Oswestry disability index (ODI-U), modified-modified Schober’s test (MMST), prone isometric chest raise test, and Short Form 36-Item Survey (SF-36) for measuring the pain at rest, functional disability, lumbar ROM, BME, and QOL, respectively. All patients received twelve treatment sessions over 4 weeks, and then all outcome measures were again recorded. Results By using the ANCOVA test, a statistically significant ( p < 0.05) between-group improvement was observed in VAS, ODI-U, BME, lumbar ROM, role physical (RP), and bodily pain (BP) domains of SF-36, which was in favour of NSD therapy group. The between-group difference was 1.07 ± 0.32 cm ( p < .001) for VAS, 5.65 ± 1.48 points ( p < .001) for ODI-U, 13.93 ± 5.85 s ( p = 0.002) for BME, 2.62 ± 0.27 cm ( p < .001) for lumbar flexion, 0.96 ± 0.28 ( p < .001) for lumbar extension, 5.77 ± 2.39 ( p = 0.019) for RP and 6.33 ± 2.52 ( p = 0.016) for BP domain of SF-36. For these outcomes, a medium to large effect size (d = 0.61–2.47, 95% CI: 0.09–3.14) was observed. Conclusion It was concluded that a combination of non-surgical spinal decompression therapy with routine physical therapy is more effective, statistically and clinically, than routine physical therapy alone in terms of improving pain, lumbar range of motion, back muscle endurance, functional disability, and physical role domain of quality of life, in patients with lumbar radiculopathy, following 4 weeks of treatment. Trial registration WHO Iranian registry of clinical trials ( IRCT20190717044238N1 ) Dated: 23.12.2019.

orthopedics,rheumatology
The effects of neck exercise in comparison to passive or no intervention on quantitative sensory testing measurements in adults with chronic neck pain: A systematic review

Daniel Osborne,Ferozkhan Jadhakhan,Deborah Falla

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303166

IF: 3.7

2024-05-04

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Previous systematic reviews have identified the benefits of exercise for chronic neck pain on subjective reports of pain, but not with objective measures such as quantitative sensory testing (QST). A systematic review was conducted to identify the effects of neck specific exercise on QST measures in adults with chronic neck pain to synthesise existing literature and provide clinical recommendations. The study protocol was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (PROSPERO CRD42021297383). For both randomised and non-randomised trials, the following databases and trial registries were searched: AMED, CINAHL, Embase, Google Scholar, Medline, PEDro, PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index from Web of Science Core Collection, clinicaltrials.gov, GreyOpen, and ISRCTN registry. These searches were conducted from inception to February 2022 and were updated until September 2023. Reference lists of eligible studies were screened. Study selection was performed independently by two reviewers, with data extraction and quality appraisal completed by one reviewer and independently ratified by a second reviewer. Due to high heterogeneity, narrative synthesis was performed with results grouped by exercise type. Three trials were included. Risk of bias was rated as moderate and the certainty of evidence as low or moderate for all studies. All exercise groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement at an intermediate-term follow-up, with progressive resistance training combined with graded physical training demonstrating the highest certainty of evidence. Fixed resistance training demonstrated statistically significant improvement in QST measures at a short-term assessment. Fixed resistance training is effective for short-term changes in pain sensitivity based on low-quality evidence, whilst moderate-quality evidence supports progressive resistance training combined with graded physical training for intermediate-term changes in pain sensitivity.

multidisciplinary sciences
Photogrammetric Quantification Analysis of Forward Head Posture among Healthy Participants and Subjects with Neck and Shoulder Pain – A Strobe Cross Sectional Study

Sindhuja Munuswamy,Kanimozhiselvi Sounderrajan Jamunarani,Radhika Jayaraman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61453/intij.202344

2023-09-01

Abstract:Background:Musculoskeletal structures can change into an incorrect shape due to a reduction in physical activity and inappropriate posture habits in daily living. Aim of the study: To study and investigate the forward head posture which is related to shoulder and neck pain. Materials and Method: The design of this study was observational cross-sectional study and conducted in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement (STROBE). The study was conducted between January 2023 and March 2023. A total of 65 participants (42 males,23 females) aged 18- 35 years. Neck pain was measured using Neck Disability Index (NDI), shoulder pain was measured using DASH questionnaire, Forward Head Posture (FHP) was measured using CVA angle by photogrammetry. Theresults were compared and correlated using appropriate statistical tools.For data analysis, the computer program Statistical Social Science Package (SPSS) (19 windows version) has been used. The p value was considered < 0.01 considered quite significant. Conclusion: Cervical and shoulder pain, which is the causative factor to increase forward head posture and significant discomfort in all the participants.
[Radiological and histological study of round bronchogenic tumors].

D. Horváth,F. Serafini

1962-10-31

Abstract:
The efficacy of forward head correction on nerve root function and pain in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a randomized trial

Aliaa A Diab,Ibrahim M Moustafa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215511419536

2011-09-21

Clinical Rehabilitation

Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effect of forward head posture correction on pain and nerve root function in cases of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Design: A randomized controlled study with six months follow-up. Setting: University research laboratory. Subjects: Ninety-six patients with unilateral lower cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (C5–C6 and C6–C7) and craniovertebral angle measured less than or equal to 50° were randomly assigned to an exercise or a control group. Interventions: The control group ( n = 48) received ultrasound and infrared radiation, whereas the exercise group ( n = 48) received a posture corrective exercise programme in addition to ultrasound and infrared radiation. Main outcome measures: The peak-to-peak amplitude of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials, craniovertebral angle, visual analogue scale were measured for all patients at three intervals (before treatment, after 10 weeks of treatment, and at follow-up of six months). Results: There was a significant difference between groups adjusted to baseline value of outcome at 10 weeks post-treatment for craniovertebral angle, pain, C6 and C7 peak-to-peak amplitude of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials P = 0.000, 0.01, 0.000, 0.001 respectively and at follow-up for all previous variables ( P = 0.000). Conclusion: Forward head posture correction using a posture corrective exercise programme in addition to ultrasound and infrared radiation decreased pain and craniovertebral angle and increased the peak-to-peak amplitude of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials for C6 and C7 in cases of lower cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.

rehabilitation
Effect of neck-specific exercises with and without internet support on cervical range of motion and neck muscle endurance in chronic whiplash-associated disorders: analysis of functional outcomes of a randomized controlled trial

Gunnel Peterson,Emma Nilsing Strid,Margaretha Jönsson,Jesper Hävermark,Anneli Peolsson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.34785

2024-07-29

Abstract:Objective: To compare the effects of a neck-specific exercise programme with internet support and 4 physiotherapist sessions (NSEIT) and the same neck-specific exercises supervised by a physiotherapist (NSE) on neck muscle endurance and cervical range of motion. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Patients: A total of 140 participants with chronic whiplash-associated disorders grade II or grade III were randomly assigned to the NSEIT or NSE groups. Methods: Outcomes were changes in active cervical range of motion, cranio-cervical flexion test, neck muscle endurance, and neck pain, at 3- and 15-month follow-ups. Results: There were no significant differences between the NSEIT and NSE groups. There was a significant group-by-time inter-action effect in active cervical range of motion flexion/extension where the NSEIT group improved to 3-month follow-up, but the NSE group did not. Both groups were significantly improved over time in all other outcomes (p < 0.001) at 3- and 15-month follow-ups, with effect size between 0.64 and 1.35 in active cervical range of motion, cranio-cervical flexion test, dorsal neck muscle endurance, and neck pain, and effect size between 0.22 and 0.42 in ventral neck muscle endurance. Conclusion: Both NSE and NSEIT led to improved neck function. Depending on the patients' needs, either NSE or NSEIT could be used as treatment for patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorders.
Unknotting tech neck by breaking the cycle of pain and disability: Comparing the impact of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization on specific muscles and superficial back arm line

Karishma Das,Sunita Kumari,Moattar Raza Rizvi,Ankita Sharma,Waqas Sami,Noof Fahad A Al-Kuwari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.02.041

Abstract:Background: Computer professionals often develop a forward head posture due to prolonged hours of computer use, leading to neck pain. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM), an advanced technique for treating myofascial trigger points, has become increasingly popular for addressing these musculoskeletal issues. Objectives: The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of IASTM mobilization on SBAL (superficial back arm line) and SM(specific muscles-upper trapezius, levator scapulae, and sternocleidomastoid) in managing chronic neck pain among computer professionals. Participants & methods: The study involved 62 computer professionals, randomly divided into two groups. Group A received IASTM on SBAL and group B received IASTM on SM for neck pain each receiving three sessions weekly for four weeks. Outcome variables like Neck Disability Index (NDI), NPRS(Neck Pain Rating Scale), Craniovertebral angle (CVA), and range of motion (ROM) for flexion, and side flexion (right & left side) were evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks. Results: Significant improvement in NPRS were observed in both the SBAL and SM groups after 2 weeks of IASTM, wth the SBAL group demonstrating greater improvement. At 4 weeks, IASTM on SBAL showed significantly higher improvements in NPRS, CVA, NDI, and flexion compared to the SM group. The repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant main effect of both time and group, along with a significant interaction between time and group for all outcome variables, except for CVA. Conclusion: The study indicates that IASTM on SBAL may offer a more effective treatment for chronic neck pain in computer professionals compared to targeting specific muscles.
Comparative effectiveness of physical exercise interventions for chronic non-specific neck pain: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of 40 randomised controlled trials

Rutger MJ de Zoete,Nigel R Armfield,James H McAuley,Kenneth Chen,Michele Sterling

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102664

IF: 18.4793

2020-11-02

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Objective To compare the effectiveness of different physical exercise interventions for chronic non-specific neck pain. Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data sources Electronic databases: AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, PsycINFO, Scopus and SPORTDiscus. Eligibility criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) describing the effects of any physical exercise intervention in adults with chronic non-specific neck pain. Results The search returned 6549 records, 40 studies were included. Two networks of pairwise comparisons were constructed, one for pain intensity (n=38 RCTs, n=3151 participants) and one for disability (n=29 RCTs, n=2336 participants), and direct and indirect evidence was obtained. Compared with no treatment, three exercise interventions were found to be effective for pain and disability: motor control (Hedges’ g , pain −1.32, 95% CI: −1.99 to −0.65; disability −0.87, 95% CI: –1.45 o −0.29), yoga/Pilates/Tai Chi/Qigong (pain −1.25, 95% CI: –1.85 to −0.65; disability –1.16, 95% CI: –1.75 to −0.57) and strengthening (pain –1.21, 95% CI: –1.63 to −0.78; disability –0.75, 95% CI: –1.28 to −0.22). Other interventions, including range of motion (pain −0.98 CI: −2.51 to 0.56), balance (pain −0.38, 95% CI: −2.10 to 1.33) and multimodal (three or more exercises types combined) (pain −0.08, 95% CI: −1.70 to 1.53) exercises showed uncertain or negligible effects. The quality of evidence was very low according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. Conclusion There is not one superior type of physical exercise for people with chronic non-specific neck pain. Rather, there is very low quality evidence that motor control, yoga/Pilates/Tai Chi/Qigong and strengthening exercises are equally effective. These findings may assist clinicians to select exercises for people with chronic non-specific neck pain. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019126523.

sport sciences
Efficacy of telerehabilitation in patients with nonspecific neck pain: A meta-analysis

Hui Zou,Zhoupeng Lu,Peng Zhao,Jialin Wang,Ruirui Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x241235982

2024-03-03

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract:Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, Ahead of Print. IntroductionAt a rate of more than 30% annually, neck pain is a very prevalent musculoskeletal ailment that is second only to low back pain as the most common cause of disability. Most occurrences of neck pain are nonspecific. Telerehabilitation is regarded as a potentially effective healthcare approach in this setting. This review aims to evaluate how a telerehabilitation-based intervention affected individuals with nonspecific neck pain (NNP) in terms of pain and disability.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, and WanFang were consulted from inception to September 2023, with the inclusion of randomized controlled trials only. The experimental data were meta-analyzed using RevMan 5.3.ResultsThe meta-analysis contained eight studies; there was no significant difference in pain improvement in patients with NNP by telerehabilitation compared to conventional care (SMD = −0.10, 95% CI: −0.48 to 0.28), but there was a significant effect on disability improvement (SMD = −0.41, 95% CI: −0.78 to −0.03). Telerehabilitation demonstrated more significant improvements in pain (SMD = −1.16, 95% CI: −1.99 to −0.32) and disability (MD = −3.78, 95% CI: −5.29 to −2.27) compared to minimal or no intervention.DiscussionThis study emphasizes the potential benefits of employing telerehabilitation in patients with NNP, especially in reducing pain intensity and improving disability. But additional study is required to fully grasp the potential of telerehabilitation in this field.

health care sciences & services
Effect of Muscle Energy Techniques and facet joint mobilization on spinal curvature in patients with mechanical neck pain: A Pilot study.

Muhammad Osama,Naureen Tassadaq,Reem Javed Malik,Reem Malik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/jpma.14189

2019-01-01

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association

Abstract:Neck is one of the most common site of musculoskeletal symptom manifestations. An impaired spinal curvature is a common finding in patients with mechanical neck pain. A pre-post quasi experimental pilot study was conducted at Fauji Foundation Hospital from January- March 2017,in which 12 patients with mechanical neck pain and straightening of the cervical spine were included and treated for 7 consecutive sessions consisting of muscle energy techniques (MET) in combination with facet joint mobilization. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of MET and facet joint mobilization on spinal curvature and functional outcomes in patients with neck pain. Outcome measurement tools that were included comprised of pain severity, neck disability index (NDI), cervical lordosis which was measured via x-ray based posterior tangential method, goniometry for cervical range of motion (ROM) and modified sphygmomanometer dynamometry (MSD) for isometric muscle strength. A significant difference was observed in pre and post treatment scores for all outcomes (p<0.05); demonstrating an effective combination therapy in terms of improved spinal curvature, pain, disability, ROM and isometric muscle strength.

medicine, general & internal, research & experimental
Effectiveness of Global Postural Re-education in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial

Paolo Pillastrini,Fernanda de Lima E Sá Resende,Federico Banchelli,Anna Burioli,Emanuele Di Ciaccio,Andrew A Guccione,Jorge Hugo Villafañe,Carla Vanti,Fernanda de Lima e Sá Resende,Andrew A. Guccione

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20150501

2016-09-01

Physical Therapy

Abstract:Abstract Background Global postural re-education (GPR) has shown positive results for patients with musculoskeletal disorders, but no previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) has investigated its effectiveness as the sole procedure for adult patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain (NP). Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of applying GPR compared with a manual therapy (MT) intervention to patients with chronic nonspecific NP. Design An RCT was conducted. Patients Ninety-four patients with chronic nonspecific NP (72 women and 22 men; average age=47.5 years, SD=11.3) were randomly assigned to receive either a GPR intervention or an MT intervention. Outcome Measures Pain intensity (visual analog scale), disability (Neck Disability Index), cervical range of motion, and kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia) were assessed. Methods The experimental group received GPR, and the reference group received MT. Both groups received nine 60-minute-long sessions with one-to-one supervision from physical therapists as the care providers. All participants were asked to follow ergonomic advice and to perform home exercises. Measures were assessed before treatment, following treatment, and at a 6-month follow-up. Results No important baseline differences were found between groups. The experimental group exhibited a statistically significant reduction in pain following treatment and in disability 6 months after the intervention compared with the reference group. Limitations Randomization did not lead to completely homogeneous groups. It also was noted that the time spent integrating the movements practiced during the session into daily routines at the end of each session was requested only of participants in the GPR group and may have had an impact on patient adherence that contributed to a better outcome. Conclusions The results suggest that GPR was more effective than MT for reducing pain after treatment and for reducing disability at 6-month follow-up in patients with chronic nonspecific NP.
Online Exercise Programs for Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Reveals Comparable Effects of Global, Local, and Combined Approaches

Jente Bontinck,Mira Meeus,Lennard Voogt,Marjolein Chys,Iris Coppieters,Barbara Cagnie,Kayleigh De Meulemeester

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae040

2024-03-18

Physical Therapy

Abstract:Abstract Objective Specific neck exercises are recommended in the rehabilitation of chronic nonspecific neck pain. They are unfortunately often accompanied by acute pain flare-ups. Global exercises might be a beneficial addition, as they activate endogenous analgesia without overloading painful structures. However, it is still unclear which type of exercise is most effective. This randomized controlled trial was done to evaluate the effect of an online blended program of global and specific neck exercises, compared to programs including only 1 of both types of exercise. Methods Forty-eight patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain were randomized into 3 groups. Online questionnaires were collected at baseline, at midtreatment, immediately after treatment, and at the 3-month follow-up. Quantitative sensory testing and actigraphy were assessed at baseline and after treatment. Linear mixed-model analyses were performed to evaluate treatment effects within and between groups. Neck pain–related disability after treatment was considered the primary outcome. Results No time × treatment interaction effects were found. All groups improved in neck pain–related disability, pain intensity, self-reported symptoms of central sensitization, local pain sensitivity, physical activity, and pain medication use. No effects were found on quality of life, sleep quality, depression, anxiety, stress, widespread pain sensitivity, health economics, or actigraphy measurements. A higher global perceived effect was reported after performing the blended program, compared to the other groups. Conclusion A blended exercise program was not superior to the stand-alone programs in reducing disability. Nevertheless, the global perceived effect of this type of exercise was higher. Future research necessitates larger sample sizes to adequately explore the optimal type of exercise for patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain. Impact Exercise therapy should be an important part of the rehabilitation of patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain, regardless of the type of exercise.

rehabilitation,orthopedics

Prof. V. F. Boldyrev

Comparison of Treatment Outcome of the Effectiveness of Isometric Exercises as Compared to General Exercises with Cervical Spine Mobilization in The Management of Chronic Non Specific Neck Pain

Effects of Integrating Jaw Opening and Closing Movements with Active Neck Exercises in the Management of Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Disseminated intravascular coagulation in multiorgan donors.

Effect of Global Posture Re-Education Versus Static Stretching on Pain, Range of Motion And Quality of Life in Post-Menopausal Women with Chronic Neck Pain

Investigation of the effectiveness of neck stabilization exercises in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized, single-blind clinical, controlled study

Effectiveness of Physical Exercise on Pain, Disability, Job Stress, and Quality of Life in Office Workers with Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of clinical pilates exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain: a randomized clinical trial

Effect of post-isometric relaxation versus myofascial release therapy on pain, functional disability, rom and qol in the management of non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Effects of non-surgical decompression therapy in addition to routine physical therapy on pain, range of motion, endurance, functional disability and quality of life versus routine physical therapy alone in patients with lumbar radiculopathy; a randomized controlled trial

The effects of neck exercise in comparison to passive or no intervention on quantitative sensory testing measurements in adults with chronic neck pain: A systematic review

Photogrammetric Quantification Analysis of Forward Head Posture among Healthy Participants and Subjects with Neck and Shoulder Pain – A Strobe Cross Sectional Study

[Radiological and histological study of round bronchogenic tumors].

The efficacy of forward head correction on nerve root function and pain in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a randomized trial

Effect of neck-specific exercises with and without internet support on cervical range of motion and neck muscle endurance in chronic whiplash-associated disorders: analysis of functional outcomes of a randomized controlled trial

Unknotting tech neck by breaking the cycle of pain and disability: Comparing the impact of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization on specific muscles and superficial back arm line

Comparative effectiveness of physical exercise interventions for chronic non-specific neck pain: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of 40 randomised controlled trials

Efficacy of telerehabilitation in patients with nonspecific neck pain: A meta-analysis

Effect of Muscle Energy Techniques and facet joint mobilization on spinal curvature in patients with mechanical neck pain: A Pilot study.

Effectiveness of Global Postural Re-education in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial

Online Exercise Programs for Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Reveals Comparable Effects of Global, Local, and Combined Approaches