Abstract:Individuals often preferentially avoid information that contradicts and seek information that aligns with their prior beliefs-a tendency referred to as "selective exposure." Traditionally, prior research has focused on intrapersonal drivers of selective exposure, including avoidance of cognitive dissonance. We take a complementary approach by investigating the conditions under which interpersonal concerns drive selective exposure. Drawing on a large literature on impression management, we test a social signaling model of selective exposure, which predicts that (a) individuals shift their information selection decisions to signal to observers and (b) observers reward such shifts. We test this model in the domain of partisan politics in the United States across five financially incentivized, preregistered experiments (N = 3,598). Our results extend prior theory by identifying three key contingencies: the type of task on which observers expect to collaborate with actors, alignment of group membership between observers and actors, and the magnitude of demonstrated selective exposure. Overall, we find that tailoring one's information selection decisions can indeed have strategic value-but only under certain theoretically predictable conditions. Our work also identifies an actor-observer misalignment: While observers are sensitive to the type of future interaction with an actor, the actors themselves do not intuit this sensitivity. In the era of social media, when information selection decisions are more public than ever and the spread of misinformation is pervasive, understanding the ways in which reputational considerations shape decision making not only illuminates why selective exposure persists, but also suggests novel mitigation strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

GENERALIZING THE ILLUSORY CORRELATION EFFECT

Illusory-Correlation Effects on Implicit and Explicit Evaluation

Laypeople's beliefs about the effects of common estimator variables on memory

The social amplification of illusory correlations

Implicit and Explicit Illusory Correlation as a Function of Political Ideology

Illusory correlations revisited: The role of pseudocontingencies and working-memory capacity

The moral foundations of illusory correlation

Conspiracy Beliefs and the Perception of Intergroup Inequalities

Investigating the Robustness of the Illusory Truth Effect Across Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability, Need for Cognitive Closure, and Cognitive Style

Ensemble perception of emotion: Incidental effects of social identity.

Perceived controllability of group membership does not moderate individuating information effects in implicit person perception

Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation.

Inducing perceived group variability triggers the incorporation of counter-stereotypic information into a generalized stereotype change

[Accidental injection of adrenaline in a finger with EpiPen].

People perception and stereotype-based responding: task context matters

Isolated But Not Necessarily Lonely

Limited resources or limited luck? Why people perceive an illusory negative correlation between the outcomes of choice options despite unequivocal evidence for independence

How Orthogonal Are the Big Two of Social Perception? On the Curvilinear Relation Between Agency and Communion

The contingent reputational benefits of selective exposure to partisan information.

The illusion of information adequacy

Does Interference Between Intuitive Conceptions and Scientific Concepts Produce Reliable Inter-individual Differences? A Psychometric Analysis