Abstract:Introduction: The purpose of this split-mouth trial was to investigate the effect of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) on the rate of tooth movement. Methods: Thirty-two patients (24 female, 8 male; mean age, 19.26 ± 2.48 years) who required fixed orthodontic treatment and maxillary first premolar extractions participated in this trial with MOPs randomly allocated to either the right or left sides distal to the maxillary canines. Eligibility criteria included Class II Division 1 malocclusion, healthy periodontal condition, no smoking, and no systemic disease. Miniscrews were used to support anchorage and retract the canines with the aid of closed-coil nickel-titanium springs with 150 g of force. Randomization was accomplished with block randomization with a permuted block size of 2 with a 1:1 allocation ratio to either right or left with allocations concealed in opaque, sealed envelopes. Blinding was used at the data collection and analysis stages. Three MOPs were performed using miniscrews (5 mm depth, 1.5 mm width) on the buccal bone distal to the canines on the randomly selected side. The primary outcome was the rate of canine retraction measured from 3-dimensional digital models superimposed at the rugae area from the baseline to the first, second, and third months. The following secondary outcomes were examined: anchorage loss, canine tipping, canine rotation, root resorption, plaque index, and gingival index. Pain level, pain interference with the patients' daily life, patients' satisfaction with the procedure and degree of ease, willingness to repeat the procedure, and recommendation to others were also evaluated. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of tooth movement between the MOP and the control sides at all time points (first month: P = 0.77; mean difference, 0.2 mm; 95% CI, -0.13, 0.18 mm; second month: P = 0.50; mean difference, -0.08 mm; 95% CI, -0.33, 0.16 mm; third month: P = 0.76; mean difference, -0.05 mm; 95% CI, -0.40, 0.29 mm). There were also no differences in anchorage loss, rotation, tipping, root resorption, plaque index, periodontal index, and pain perception between the MOP and control sides at any time point (P >0.05). MOPs had no effect on the patients' daily life except for a feeling of swelling on the first day (P = 0.05). Level of satisfaction and degree of easiness of the procedure were high. A significant percentage of patients were willing to repeat the procedure and recommend it to others. No serious harm was observed. Conclusions: Three MOPs were not effective in accelerating tooth movement at any time point. Other secondary parameters evaluated were not different between the MOP and control sides except for the feeling of swelling on day 1 on the MOP side. Patients were highly satisfied with the MOP procedure, and many considered MOPs an easy procedure and were willing to repeat and recommend it to friends. Registration: This trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov with identifier number NCT02473471. Protocol: The protocol was not published before trial commencement. Funding: This work was supported by Jordanian University of Science and Technology (grant number 20150263). No conflict of interest is declared.

Evaluation of pulpal blood flow during orthodontic space closure: Prospective clinical trial

Effect of orthodontic space closure on dental pulp sensitivity. Prospective clinical trial

Pulp Blood Flow Changes in Maxillary and Mandibular Anterior Teeth after Orthodontic Retraction: a Prospective Study

The effect of orthodontic Force Application and Tooth Movement on Dental Pulp

Initial changes in pulpal microvasculature during orthodontic tooth movement: a stereological study

Periodontal ligament and alveolar bone remodeling during long orthodontic tooth movement analyzed by a novel user-independent 3D-methodology

Accelarated Orthodontic Treatment Using Microosteoperforations: A Comparative Study

The Role of Bone and Root Resorption on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Anterior Teeth Subjected to Orthodontic Forces: A Finite Element Approach

MMPs and TIMPs Expression Levels in the Periodontal Ligament during Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review of In Vitro and In Vivo Studies

The Effect of Ultrasound on Orthodontic Tooth Movement

Biological alterations associated with the orthodontic treatment with conventional appliances and aligners: A systematic review of clinical and preclinical evidence

Comparison of Amount of Space Closure During En- Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Three Accelerated Orthodontic Treatment Techniques- Micro Osteo-Perforation, Photo Bio-Modulation and Peizocision : A Retrospective Study

Micro-anatomical responses in periodontal complexes of mice to calibrated orthodontic forces on the crown.

Ischemic Risks Induced by Larger Orthodontic Forces on Dental Pulp and Neuro-Vascular Bundle in Reduced Periodontium

The Effect of Larger Orthodontic Forces and Movement Types over a Dental Pulp and Neuro-Vascular Bundle of Lower Premolars in Intact Periodontium-A Numerical Analysis

Evaluation of the effects of photobiomodulation on orthodontic movement of molar verticalization with mini-implant: A randomized double-blind protocol study

Comparison of rate of tooth movement and pain perception during accelerated tooth movement associated with conventional fixed appliances with micro-osteoperforations – a randomised controlled trial

The effect of micro-osteoperforation on root resorption, pulp vitality, and biological changes of teeth subjected to orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review study

Evaluation of Periodontal Status after Orthodontic Treatment: A Pilot Study on Patients with Stage IV/Grade C Periodontitis

Impact of micro-osteoperforations on root resorption and alveolar bone in en-masse retraction in young adults: A CBCT randomized controlled clinical trial

Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults with Class II malocclusion: A randomized controlled clinical trial