A pediatrician's approach to counseling families of mentally retarded children.

J. Davis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/0090-4481-19730701-06

1973-07-01

Pediatric Annals

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Euthanasia in advanced dementia; the view of the general practitioners in the Netherlands on a vignette case along the juridical and ethical dispute

Jaap Schuurmans,Chantalle Crol,Boudewijn Chabot,Marcel Olde Rikkert,Yvonne Engels

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01580-z

2021-11-18

Abstract:Background: In the Netherlands, euthanasia has been regulated by law since 2002. In the past decade, a growing number of persons with dementia requested for euthanasia, and more requests were granted. A euthanasia request from a patient with advanced dementia (PWAD) can have a major impact on a general practitioner (GP). We aimed to get insights in the views of Dutch GPs on euthanasia concerning this patient group. Methods: A postal survey was sent to 894 Dutch GPs. Questions were asked about a case vignette about a PWAD who was not able to confirm previous wishes anymore. Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 894 GPs approached, 422 (47.3%) completed the survey. One hundred seventy-eight GPs (42.2%) did not agree with the statement that an Advance Euthanasia Directive (AED) can replace an oral request if communication with the patient concerned has become impossible. About half of the respondents (209; 49.5%) did not agree that the family can initiate a euthanasia trajectory, 95 GPs (22.5%) would accept such a family initiative and 110 GPs (26.1%) would under certain conditions. Discussion: In case of a PWAD, when confirming previous wishes is not possible anymore, about half of the Dutch GPs would not accept an AED to replace verbal or non-verbal conformation nor consider performing euthanasia; a minority would. Our study shows that, probably due to the public debate and changed professional guidelines, conflicting views have arisen among Dutch GPs about interpretation of moral, ethical values considering AED and PWADs.
Euthanasia in Dementia: A Narrative Review of Legislation and Practices in the Netherlands and Belgium

Radboud M Marijnissen,Kenneth Chambaere,Richard C Oude Voshaar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.857131

2022-06-02

Abstract:Euthanasia was first legalized in the Netherlands and Belgium in 2001 and 2002, respectively. Currently they are among the few countries that also allow euthanasia on the basis of dementia, which is still considered controversial, both from a scientific and societal perspective. To date, euthanasia in dementia constitutes a small proportion of all Dutch and Belgian euthanasia cases. However, instances are rising due to a growing awareness among the general public about the possibilities of a self-chosen end-of-life and the willingness among medical professionals to perform euthanasia in individuals diagnosed with dementia. In both countries euthanasia is allowed under strict conditions in patients with dementia and decisional capacity regarding euthanasia, while in the Netherlands an advance euthanasia directive can also replace an oral request for euthanasia in those with late-stage dementia. Judging euthanasia requests from patients with dementia is complex and the assessment of the due care criteria (especially those related to decisional capacity and unbearable suffering) requires caution and great care. In this narrative review, we reflect on the legal regulation, clinical guidelines and societal debate regarding euthanasia in dementia in the Netherlands and Belgium. By discussing the 20 years of experience with the ethical dilemmas and controversial aspects surrounding this delicate topic, we hope to inform the preparation or implementation of new legislation on euthanasia in dementia in other countries.
Capacity assessment for euthanasia in dementia: A qualitative study of 60 Dutch cases

Arne van den Bosch,Radboud M Marijnissen,Denise J C Hanssen,Richard C Oude Voshaar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19218

2024-10-21

Abstract:Background: The number of patients with dementia who are granted euthanasia or assisted suicide (EAS) increases yearly in the Netherlands. By law, patients need to be decisionally competent or have an advance directive. Assessment of decisional capacity is challenging as dementia progressively affects cognitive performance. We aimed to assess qualitatively which factors, and how, influence the judgment of decisional capacity in EAS cases with dementia. Methods: We performed a qualitative study of 60 dementia EAS case summaries published by the Dutch regional euthanasia review committees between 2012 and 2021. Included reports were evaluated using the grounded theory approach. All quotes related to decisional capacity were coded independently by two researchers and compared in an iterative process to formulate an overarching framework on the assessment of decisional capacity. We selected 20 patients who had an advance directive and were judged to be decisionally compromised, as well as a selection of 40 EAS cases judged to be decisionally competent, half of which also had an advance directive (purposive sampling). Results: Decisional capacity was present in every case report. Predefined, external criteria were rarely described explicitly, but physicians indirectly referred to the (cognitive) criteria set by Appelbaum and Grisso. Whether the thresholds for these dimensional criteria were met was influenced by six supporting factors (level of communication, psychiatric comorbidity, personality, presence of an advance directive, consistency of the request, and, finally, the patient-physician relationship) that also directly contributed to the judgment of capacity. The involved physicians and executed investigations were the two contextual factors providing a background. Conclusions: Decisional capacity regarding euthanasia is a multidimensional construct, often implicitly assessed and influenced by supporting and contextual factors. The subjectivity of the final judgment poses ethical and legal issues and argues for continuous quality improvement processes.
Medical management and complications of X‐linked hypophosphatemic vitamin D resistant rickets

T. Ono,Y. Seino

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-200X.1997.tb03628.x

1997-08-01

Abstract:To improve the growth failure, bowed legs, and biochemical and radiological abnormalities in patients with X‐linked hypophosphatemic vitamin D resistant rickets (XLH), combined therapy of phosphate and calcitriol is the best therapeutic approach at present. However, the complications involving combined therapy, such as hypercalcemia, nephrocalcinosis and hyperparathyroidism, are not fully solved. To achieve better control, new therapeutic approaches have been reported recently, for example, growth hormone (GH) or new vitamin D analogs. GH improved linear growth, decreased phosphate reabsorption and increased 1‐α‐hydroxylase activity. Furthermore, 24R, 25‐dihydroxyvitamin D3 (24,25) improved the bone lesions in hypophosphatemic (Hyp) mice, and also in XLH, without the adverse effects such as hypercalcemia or hypercalciuria compared with 1,25‐dihydroxyvitamin D3. These new approaches should be considered for the treatment of patients with XLH.
Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide in Dementia - the European Perspective

Richard Oude Voshaar,Radboud Marijnissen,Lia Fernandes,Arne van den Bosch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2024.01.079

2024-04-01

Abstract:In 2002, the Netherlands was the first jurisdiction worldwide that has legalized euthanasia and physician assisted suicide. Although the number of jurisdictions that has legalized euthanasia and medical assisted suicide has gradually increased over the years, the Dutch law is still progressive allowing euthanasia and physician assisted dying in non-terminal illnesses as well as advanced stages of dementia. This legislation has been praised as well as criticized. Proponents point to the principles of justice, mercy, the right to a dignified end of life, the responsibility of a doctor for a good life, including a good end of life, and the right of self-determination of people. Critics point to conflicting treatment goals, problems due to countertransference, complexity of the interpretation of due diligence, the distinction with chronic suicidality and finally the fact that many psychiatrists do not feel competent to perform euthanasia with due medical care. First, we will briefly present the current Dutch procedure, including the independent role of so-called SCEN-physicians. The Support and Consultation of Euthanasia in the Netherlands (SCEN) is a training and licensing program of the Royal Dutch Medical Association. In the first presentation, Radboud Marijnissen will present an overview of the development and current practice of euthanasia in dementia in the Netherlands. Thereafter, Lia Fernandes will present and discuss the debate on the legislation of euthanasia in Portugal, which is still controversial being a primarily Catholic country. The third presentation is a scientific evaluation of the assessment of mental capacity in 60 dementia cases that received euthanasia in the Netherlands. After the three presentations, the pros and cons of euthanasia in dementia as well as the current legislation will be discussed.

psychiatry,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
Navigating Dilemmas on Advance Euthanasia Directives of Patients With Advanced Dementia

Djura O. Coers,Eefje M. Sizoo,Maryam Bloemen,Marike E. de Boer,Agnes van der Heide,Cees M.P.M. Hertogh,Carlo J.W. Leget,Trynke Hoekstra,Martin Smalbrugge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105300

IF: 7.802

2024-10-12

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract:Objectives This study revisited the complexities faced by physicians in meeting due care criteria for euthanasia in patients with advanced dementia in The Netherlands. Despite increasing cases and legal provisions for advance euthanasia directives (AEDs), physicians encounter challenges with ethical issues, including patient communication and assessing unbearable suffering in patients who lack decisional capacity. This study examines the perspectives of older adult care physicians (ECPs), support and consultation on euthanasia in The Netherlands (SCEN) physicians, and euthanasia expertise center (EEC) physicians. Design A multimethod descriptive study using a questionnaire with both closed and open-ended questions. Setting and Participants This study explores the complexities faced by physicians in handling AED-based euthanasia requests of patients with advanced dementia. Methods Baseline characteristics of physician subgroups were analyzed descriptively, and subgroup variations were assessed using univariate regression. Qualitative data underwent thematic content analysis. Results With a 13.8% response rate, the study included 290 participants: 108 ECPs, 188 SCEN physicians, and 53 EEC physicians. Some had combined roles: ECP and SCEN physicians (n = 29), ECP and EEC physician (n = 1), SCEN physicians and EEC physicians (n = 17), and ECP, SCEN physicians, and EEC physicians (n = 6). ECPs received most AED-based euthanasia requests but only 7 EEC physicians and 1 SCEN physician performed euthanasia. All subgroups stressed the importance of patient communication. ECPs found euthanasia ethically justifiable only when communication was possible, highlighting the need to understand current euthanasia wishes and verify unbearable suffering. Effective communication was deemed crucial for confirming request relevance, identifying obstacles, involving patients, fostering trust, and alleviating fears. Physicians generally agreed that unbearable suffering could be assessed through patient expressions, observations, and family input. Conclusions and Implications Despite receiving AED-based euthanasia requests, few physicians proceeded. Subgroup analysis showed varying views, with ECPs emphasizing communication and EEC physicians focusing on determining unbearable suffering. All subgroups highlighted the importance of current patient expressions and involvement in the decision-making process.

geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
FC28: Medical Assistance in Dying and assessment of decisional capacity in dementia: the Dutch Perspective!

Radboud M Marijnissen,Arne van den Bosch,Denise JC Hanssen,RC Oude Voshaar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610224001509

IF: 7.191

2024-11-29

International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract:Background: The Netherlands allows Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) based on a diagnosis of dementia under strict legal conditions. The number of dementia MAID cases gradually increase every year up to 288 cases in 2022; 282 were decisionally competent and 6 were decisionally incompetent. In decisionally incompetent patients MAID has been granted based on a written advance directive. To assess decisional competence the Dutch euthanasia review committees, refer to criteria of Appelbaum and Grisso. Objectives: To examine which factors, and how, influence the judgment of decisional competence for MAID requests of patients with dementia. Methods: A qualitative analysis was performed of 60 dementia MAID case summaries as published online by the Dutch euthanasia review committees between 2012 and 2021: 20 cases had an advance directive and were decisionally compromised at time of MAID, 40 patients were decisionally competent at time of MAID, of which 20 also had an advance directive (purposive sampling). Two researchers independently coded all text related to decisional competence (thematic analysis). A theoretical framework about the assessment of decisional competence was developed. Results: The four cognitive criteria of Appelbaum and Grisso were dimensional, and cut-off points were influenced by six factors that also directly impacted on competence assessment, i.e. level of communication, psychiatric comorbidity, personality, presence of an advance directive, consistency of the request, and the patient-physician relationship. Conclusions: The framework illustrates the complex multidimensional nature of assessment of decisional competence in dementia patients requesting MAID. Subjectivity of the final judgement poses ethical and legal issues and argues for continuous quality improvement processes.

psychiatry,geriatrics & gerontology,psychology, clinical,gerontology
The person from Porlock. Ethical issues in terminal care: the Dutch perspective

G H Blijham

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00343922

Abstract:In the Netherlands medical decisions concerning end of life (MDEL) play a role in 38% of all deaths. Euthanasia, defined as an intentional termination of life by somebody else at an individual's request, is done in 1.8% of deaths. Only 4% of Dutch physicians would never perform or refer for euthanasia, and over 50% have performed euthanasia. Around 25,000 Dutch patients per year bring up euthanasia as a possibility in case suffering becomes unbearable; around 10% will finally have euthanasia performed. On the basis of these opinions and data the Dutch legislation has recently been reformed. Euthanasia remains a crime and each case will be reviewed by the district attorney. Court decisions, however, have confirmed the view that in some cases of euthanasia the physician may be confronted with conflicting obligations and therefore will not be punished. As a consequence, cases fulfilling a number of requirements will not be prosecuted. In conclusion, MDEL including euthanasia are considered ethically justifiable and legally permissible if they are part of an open, honest and careful approach to patients with unbearable suffering, in particular in the case of cancer.
Dutch euthanasia revisited

R Fenigsen

Abstract:The results of a follow-up study of euthanasia by the Dutch government, five years after the first study, were published on November 26, 1996. This article provides a detailed review of the two reports comparing and contrasting the statistics cited therein. The author notes that the "rules of careful conduct" proposed by the courts and by the Royal Dutch Society of Medicine were frequently disregarded. Special topics included for the first time in the second study were the notification and non-prosecution procedure, euthanasia of newborns and infants, and assisted suicide in psychiatric practice. The authors of the follow-up report state that it would be desirable to reduce the number of "terminations of life without patients' request," but this must be the common responsibility of the doctor and the patient. They suggest that the person who does not wish to have his life terminated should declare this clearly, in advance, verbally and in writing, preferably in the form of a living will. Involuntary euthanasia was rampant in 1990 and equally rampant in 1995. The author concludes that Dutch doctors who practice euthanasia are not on the slippery slope. From the very beginning, they have been at the bottom.
Euthanasia on their mind: a qualitative analysis of spontaneous expressions of people with young-onset dementia and their family caregivers.

Romy Van Rickstal,Aline De Vleminck,Kenneth Chambaere,Lieve Van den Block

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610223001618

IF: 7.191

2024-02-04

International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract:Introduction: Previous research showed that people with young-onset dementia and their family caregivers spontaneously addressed the topic of euthanasia when talking about the broader topic of advance care planning. A better understanding of what people address and why may provide innovative insights to inform the evolving physician assisted dying legislation worldwide. This study aimed to identify what people with young-onset dementia and their family caregivers spontaneously expressed regarding (communication about) euthanasia when discussing the topic of advance care planning. Methods: A secondary qualitative analysis was conducted, through the method of constant comparative analysis on semi-structured interviews. We included 10 people with young-onset dementia and 25 family caregivers in Flanders, Belgium. Results: Respondents described similar contexts for discussions about euthanasia: the topic arose at several key moments, usually with informal caregivers, and was motivated by patients considering the impact of disease progression both for themselves, thereby mainly wanting to avoid decline and maintain dignity, and their loved ones. Family caregivers paid considerable attention to the legality of euthanasia in dementia, specifically with regard to cognitive capacity, and elaborated on the difficulties and emotional impact of discussing euthanasia. Conclusions: Considerations of people with young-onset dementia towards euthanasia appeared rooted in personal unbearable suffering and in expected interpersonal and societal consequences of their condition. Negative social framing of young-onset dementia might contribute to the livelihood of euthanasia in respondents' thoughts. The incorporation of euthanasia as a legal end-of-life option was mirrored in its incorporation in patients' and family caregivers' thought framework.

psychiatry,geriatrics & gerontology,psychology, clinical,gerontology
Communication about euthanasia in Dutch nursing homes

Marjolein J. H. T. Rikmenspoel,Fijgje de Boer,Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen,H. Roeline W. Pasman,Guy A. M. Widdershoven

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2024.2330011

2024-04-27

Death Studies

Abstract:In this research, we explore how competent nursing home residents in the Netherlands experience communication about euthanasia. Interviews were conducted with 15 nursing home residents. Three themes were found during data analysis: 1) The possibility to discuss euthanasia; 2) Interaction and 3) Anticipating the future. Whether or not euthanasia was discussed was influenced by the openness of the resident and the accessibility and openness of their medical practitioner. Important factors mentioned by respondents regarding interaction were the level of connectedness with others, the feeling of being understood and one's own firmness in holding on to the option of euthanasia in the future. Regarding anticipating the future, respondents felt reassured in having an advance directive. They expressed a lack of certainty whether the medical practitioner would be willing to eventually perform euthanasia. As a practical implication, ACP may provide a pathway for improvement of communication about euthanasia with competent residents.

social sciences, biomedical,psychology, multidisciplinary,social issues
[Implantations of venous ports--the latest advances].

M. Ondrák,Z. Kaplan,V. Fait,Z. Sýkorová

2005-03-01

Rozhledy v Chirurgii

Abstract:A continuously growing spectrum of cytostatic preparations used to treat oncological patients, as well as a growing spectrum of indications to treat patients with disseminated or locally advanced findings even in the elderly patients, brings on a subject of long-term venous portae problems to solve. The venous port is a smart solution of this problem. The method minimalizes risks resulting from long-term canylations of the central venous system and, primarily, substantially improves comfort of patients. This argument takes in consideration not only periods between chemotherapy applications, but also administration of the cytostatic preparation itself. The following article summarizes long-term experience with port implantations in the MOU. It points out increasing rates of patients with implanted ports and highlights frequency rates of observed complications connected with both the port implantation and the port use.
The management of acute conversion reactions in children.

J. Schulman

Abstract:
[Anxiety and anxiety neurosis].

M. Basquin

1965-09-04

Abstract:
No (true) right to die: barriers in access to physician-assisted death in case of psychiatric disease, advanced dementia or multiple geriatric syndromes in the Netherlands

Caroline van den Ende,Eva Constance Alida Asscher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10190-8

Abstract:Even in the Netherlands, where the practice of physician-assisted death (PAD) has been legalized for over 20 years, there is no such thing as a 'right to die'. Especially patients with extraordinary requests, such as a wish for PAD based on psychiatric suffering, advanced dementia, or (a limited number of) multiple geriatric syndromes, encounter barriers in access to PAD. In this paper, we discuss whether these barriers can be justified in the context of the Dutch situation where PAD is legally permitted for those who suffer unbearably and hopelessly as a result of medical conditions. Furthermore, we explore whether there are options to address some of the barriers or their consequences, both within the Dutch legal framework or by adjusting the legal framework, and whether these options are feasible. We conclude that although there are insufficient arguments to overrule the doctor's freedom of conscience in the Netherlands, there are ways to address some of the barriers, mainly by offering support to doctors that would be willing to support a request. Moreover, we believe it is morally required to reduce or mitigate where possible the negative consequences of the barriers for patients, such as the long waiting time for those who suffer from psychiatric disorders, because it is unlikely the adjustments suggested to the system will ensure reasonable access for these patient groups.
[Euthanasia in a woman with psychiatric problems]

G Casteelen,P A M Stärcke

2020-06-17

Abstract:Background: Psychiatric disorders can also be the cause of unbearable and hopeless suffering, which can lead to a carefully considered and voluntary desire for euthanasia. Case study: A 76-year-old patient had a history of unexplained physical symptoms for many years. After another new clinical treatment had not had any effect, she was helped to die at her own explicit request. Conclusion: Hopeless psychological suffering can also be a reason for providing euthanasia, on the basis of the diligence requirements of the Netherlands Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide Act and the guidelines provided by the Netherlands Psychiatric Association. This route is also open to physicians who have not specialized in psychiatry.
Euthanasia of a person with a psychiatric disorder does not violate the European Convention on Human Rights (Mortier v. Belgium [no. 78017/17])

M De Hert,S Loos,K Van Assche

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2342

2022-11-10

Abstract:For more than 20 years, euthanasia in Belgium and The Netherlands is allowed for unbearable suffering caused by terminal or non-terminal illnesses, including psychiatric disorders. Although euthanasia numbers have been increasing over the years, the percentage of cases involving people with a primary psychiatric diagnosis has remained stable (between 1 and 2%). For these cases, the Belgian and Dutch Euthanasia Laws operate similar due care criteria: a well-considered, repeated, and voluntary request from a legally competent adult; a medical condition without prospect of improvement; constant and unbearable suffering that cannot be alleviated; consultation of two independent physicians, including a psychiatrist; and a posteriori evaluation and control [1-3].
Euthanasia in adults with psychiatric conditions: A descriptive study of the experiences of Belgian psychiatrists

Monica Verhofstadt,Kurt Audenaert,Kris Van den Broeck,Luc Deliens,Freddy Mortier,Koen Titeca,Dirk De Bacquer,Kenneth Chambaere

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504211029775

Abstract:To investigate the experience of psychiatrists who completed assessment procedures of euthanasia requests from adults with psychiatric conditions (APC) over the last 12 months. Between November 2018 and April 2019 a cross-sectional survey was sent to a sample of 753 psychiatrists affiliated with Belgian organisations of psychiatrists to gather detailed information on their latest experience with a completed euthanasia assessment procedure, irrespective of its outcome (i.e. euthanasia being performed or not). Information on 46 unique cases revealed that most APC suffered from comorbid psychiatric and/or somatic disorders, and had received different kinds of treatment for many years prior to their euthanasia request. Existential suffering was the main reason for the request. The entire procedure spanned an average of 14 months, and an average of 13.5 months in the 23 cases that culminated in the performance of euthanasia. In all cases, the entire procedure entailed multidisciplinary consultations, including with family and friends. Psychiatrists reported fewer difficulties in assessing due care criteria related to the APC's self-contemplation - for example, unbearable suffering on top of the due care criteria related to their medical condition; incurability due to lack of reasonable treatment perspectives. In a few cases in which euthanasia was the outcome, not all legal criteria were fulfilled in the reporting physicians' opinions. Both positive and negative experiences of the assessment procedure were reported: for example, reduced suicide risk for the APC; an emotional burden and a feeling of being pressured for the psychiatrist. This study confirms that euthanasia assessment in APC entails a lengthy process with diverse complexities, and psychiatrists require support in more than one respect if the assessments are to be handled adequately. Thorough evaluation of current guidelines is recommended: that is, to what extent the guidelines sufficiently address the complexities around (e.g.) assessing legal criteria or involving relatives. We formulate various avenues for further research to build on this study's insights and to fill remaining knowledge gaps.
A family affair: Repeated interviews with people with dementia and a euthanasia wish and their families

Trijntje M Scheeres-Feitsma,Petruschka Schaafsma,Jenny T van der Steen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2024.2376819

2024-07-25

Abstract:This study examines the reasons of people with dementia request euthanasia and how these reasons change over time with a special focus on reasons related to family. In addition, it examines how family relates to their loved one's euthanasia wish. Seven people with dementia and a euthanasia wish in the Netherlands were interviewed, and three years later, two of them and five family members were interviewed again. Four themes were identified using thematic analyses: (1) Protecting the relationship from the impact of dementia; (2) Private domain as the primary setting to discuss euthanasia; (3) Implicit expectation to respect and agree with the euthanasia wish; (4) Experienced responsibilities of family regarding the euthanasia wish. Professionals should be aware of the position of family and the interrelatedness of the person's concern for family happiness and families' moral commitment to agree and support the wish.
Euthanasia and assisted dying: what is the current position and what are the key arguments informing the debate?

Andreas Fontalis,Efthymia Prousali,Kunal Kulkarni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076818803452

2018-11-01

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Abstract:Summary Assisted dying is a highly controversial moral issue incorporating both physician-assisted dying (PAD) and voluntary active euthanasia. End-of-life practices are debated in many countries, with assisted dying receiving different consideration across various jurisdictions. In this paper, we provide an analytic framework of the current position and the main arguments related to the rights and moral principles concerning assisted dying. Assisted dying proponents focus on the respect of autonomy, self-determination and forestalling suffering. On the other hand, concerns are raised regarding the interpretation of the constitutional right to life and balancing this with the premise of assisted dying, alongside the impacts of assisted dying on the doctor–patient relationship, which is fundamentally based on trust, mutual respect and the premise of ‘first do no harm’. Our review is underpinning the interpretation of constitutional rights and the Hippocratic Oath with the premise of assisted dying, alongside the impacts of assisted dying on the doctor–patient relationship. Most clinicians remain untrained in such decision making, with fears against crossing key ethical divides. Due to the increasing number of cases of assisted dying and lack of consensus, our review enables the integration of ethical and legal aspects and facilitates decision making.

medicine, general & internal

A pediatrician's approach to counseling families of mentally retarded children.

Euthanasia in advanced dementia; the view of the general practitioners in the Netherlands on a vignette case along the juridical and ethical dispute

Euthanasia in Dementia: A Narrative Review of Legislation and Practices in the Netherlands and Belgium

Capacity assessment for euthanasia in dementia: A qualitative study of 60 Dutch cases

Medical management and complications of X‐linked hypophosphatemic vitamin D resistant rickets

Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide in Dementia - the European Perspective

Navigating Dilemmas on Advance Euthanasia Directives of Patients With Advanced Dementia

FC28: Medical Assistance in Dying and assessment of decisional capacity in dementia: the Dutch Perspective!

The person from Porlock. Ethical issues in terminal care: the Dutch perspective

Dutch euthanasia revisited

Euthanasia on their mind: a qualitative analysis of spontaneous expressions of people with young-onset dementia and their family caregivers.

Communication about euthanasia in Dutch nursing homes

[Implantations of venous ports--the latest advances].

The management of acute conversion reactions in children.

[Anxiety and anxiety neurosis].

No (true) right to die: barriers in access to physician-assisted death in case of psychiatric disease, advanced dementia or multiple geriatric syndromes in the Netherlands

[Euthanasia in a woman with psychiatric problems]

Euthanasia of a person with a psychiatric disorder does not violate the European Convention on Human Rights (Mortier v. Belgium [no. 78017/17])

Euthanasia in adults with psychiatric conditions: A descriptive study of the experiences of Belgian psychiatrists

A family affair: Repeated interviews with people with dementia and a euthanasia wish and their families

Euthanasia and assisted dying: what is the current position and what are the key arguments informing the debate?