Impulse control disorder: Review on clinical, pharmacologic, and genetic risk factors

V Leclercq,J-C Corvol
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2024.07.001
2024-09-02
Abstract:Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms, among which impulse control disorders behaviors (ICD) emerge as significant non-motor manifestations. ICD in PD patients, including pathological gambling, hypersexuality, compulsive buying, among others, lead to considerable impairment and reduced quality of life. This review aims to explore the multifaceted risk factors associated with ICD in PD patients, including clinical, pharmacological, and genetic aspects, to enhance early identification, prevention, and management strategies. Methods: A comprehensive review of literature was conducted to identify studies investigating risk factors for ICD in PD. Data from clinical, pharmacological, and genetic studies were analyzed to elucidate the complex interplay of factors contributing to ICD development. Results: Clinical risk factors such as young age, male gender, and specific personality traits were consistently associated with a higher incidence of ICD. Environmental factors such as cultural nuances and geographic location influence ICD prevalence. Disease characteristics include early PD onset, longer disease duration, motor fluctuations, anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, and apathy. Pharmaceutical risk factors involve dopaminergic drugs, with dopamine agonists showing a dose-dependent association with ICD. Genetic risk factors highlight the involvement of dopaminergic and serotoninergic systems, with various neurotransmitter pathways implicated. Conclusions: ICDs are common and severe in PD. Understanding the multifaceted risk factors for ICD in PD is crucial for identifying patients at high risk to develop these adverse effects and developing targeted interventions to prevent their occurrence. Given their frequency and potential consequences for the patient and their family, the current strategy is to systematically screen for ICDs throughout patient follow-up, particularly when prescribing dopamine agonists.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?