Abstract:LBA9000 Background: EGFR TKIs are standard 1L therapy for metastatic NSCLC with sensitizing EGFR mutations; however, most patients (pts) ultimately experience PD. We report the protocol-specified final analysis (FA) from the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-789 study of pemetrexed (pem) and platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) with or without pembrolizumab (pembro) as subsequent therapy for pts with TKI-resistant, EGFR-mutant, metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC (NCT03515837). Methods: Adults with histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC, ECOG PS of 0 or 1, documented DEL19 or L858R EGFR mutation, and progression after EGFR TKI treatment were enrolled. Pts were randomized 1:1 to 35 cycles of pembro 200 mg Q3W or placebo (pbo) Q3W plus 4 cycles of pem and carboplatin or cisplatin Q3W followed by maintenance pem. Randomization was stratified by PD-L1 TPS (<50% vs ≥50%), prior osimertinib (yes vs no), and region (East Asia vs not East Asia). Dual primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and OS. ORR and DOR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and safety were secondary endpoints. Final PFS testing was completed at the second interim analysis (IA2; data cutoff, Dec 3, 2021); all other endpoints were assessed at FA (data cutoff, Jan 17, 2023). Efficacy boundaries based on actual observed events were 1-sided P = 0.0117 for PFS (IA2) and P = 0.0118 for OS (FA). Results: 492 pts were randomized to pembro + chemo (n = 245) or pbo + chemo (n = 247). At IA2, median PFS (95% CI) was 5.6 (5.5–5.8) mo with pembro + chemo vs 5.5 (5.4–5.6) mo with pbo + chemo; HR 0.80 (95% CI, 0.65–0.97); P = 0.0122; and the results did not reach statistical significance. Median (range) time from randomization to data cutoff at FA (Jan 17, 2023) was 42.0 (29.5–53.9) mo. At FA, median OS (95% CI) was 15.9 (13.7–18.8) vs 14.7 (12.7–17.1) mo. While the HR for OS (0.84 [95% CI, 0.69–1.02]; P = 0.0362) favored pembro + chemo vs pbo + chemo, it did not reach statistical significance. OS rates at 12-mo were 61.6% vs 59.4% and at 24-mo were 30.6% vs 26.4%. HR for OS was similar in PD-L1 TPS ≥50% (HR, 0.84) and TPS <50% groups (HR, 0.85). ORR (95% CI) in ITT was 29.0% (23.4%–35.1%) with pembro + chemo vs 27.1% (21.7%–33.1%) with pbo + chemo. Median DOR was 6.3 (2.3 to 40.8+) mo vs 5.6 (1.8+ to 40.6+) mo. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 43.7% of pts in pembro + chemo arm and 38.6% in pbo + chemo arm; grade 5 AEs occurred in 0.4% vs 0.8%. Grade ≥3 immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions occurred in 4.5% of pts in the pembro + chemo arm and 2.0% in the pbo + chemo arm; 0.4% vs 0% had grade 5 events. Conclusions: In the KEYNOTE-789 study, addition of pembro to chemo in pts with TKI-resistant, EGFR-mutant, metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC did not significantly prolong PFS and OS in comparison to pbo + chemo. AEs were manageable in both arms, and no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03820986 .

Encorafenib plus binimetinib for BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC: clinical implications of the phase 2 PHAROS study

A Practical Review of Encorafenib and Binimetinib Therapy Management in Patients with BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A plain language summary of the PHAROS study: the combination of encorafenib and binimetinib for people with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Clinical Characteristics, Co-Mutations, and Treatment Outcomes in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with the BRAF-V600E Mutation

Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib/cetuximab with or without binimetinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: an AGEO real-world multicenter study

Molecular profiling of BRAF-V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer in the phase 3 BEACON CRC trial

Encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: real-life data from an Italian multicenter experience

First-line encorafenib plus binimetinib and pembrolizumab for advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma: Safety lead-in results from the randomized phase III STARBOARD study

Retrospective analysis of the real-world demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns in metastatic CRC among patients treated with encorafenib in combination with cetuximab in the United States.

Retrospective analysis of adherence and persistence of encorafenib in combination with cetuximab among patients with BRAF metastatic CRC in the United States (US).

SEAMARK: phase II study of first-line encorafenib and cetuximab plus pembrolizumab for MSI-H/dMMR BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC

Pemetrexed and Platinum with or Without Pembrolizumab for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (Tki)-Resistant, EGFR-mutant, Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC: Phase 3 KEYNOTE-789 Study

Encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab combined therapy for patients with BRAFV600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

Binimetinib, encorafenib and cetuximab (BEACON Trial) combination therapy for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC: disease overview and treatment landscape

Encorafenib and cetuximab versus irinotecan/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab in Chinese patients with BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: The NAUTICAL CRC study.

A phase II study of encorafenib in combination with binimetinib in patients with metastatic BRAF-mutated thyroid cancer in Japan

Response rate and molecular correlates to encorafenib and binimetinib in BRAF-V600E mutant high-grade glioma

SWOG S2107: Randomized phase II trial of encorafenib and cetuximab with or without nivolumab for patients with previously treated, microsatellite stable, BRAF V600E metastatic and/or unresectable colorectal cancer.

A phase 1b study of sotorasib combined with panitumumab as second-line treatment of KRAS G12C - mutated colorectal cancer.

A Phase II Study of Vorolanib in Combination with Toripalimab in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.