The impact of COVID-19 on people with epilepsy: Global results from the coronavirus and epilepsy study

Michael J Vasey,Xin You Tai,Jennifer Thorpe,Gabriel Davis Jones,Samantha Ashby,Asma Hallab,Ding Ding,Maria Andraus,Patricia Dugan,Piero Perucca,Daniel J Costello,Jacqueline A French,Terence J O'Brien,Chantal Depondt,Danielle M Andrade,Robin Sengupta,Ashis Datta,Norman Delanty,Nathalie Jette,Charles R Newton,Martin J Brodie,Orrin Devinsky,J Helen Cross,Josemir W Sander,Jane Hanna,Frank M C Besag,Arjune Sen,COVID‐19 Epilepsy COV‐E Study Group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.13035
2024-09-03
Epilepsia Open
Abstract:Objective: To characterize the experience of people with epilepsy and aligned healthcare workers (HCWs) during the first 18 months of the COVID-19 pandemic and compare experiences in high-income countries (HICs) with non-HICs. Methods: Separate surveys for people with epilepsy and HCWs were distributed online in April 2020. Responses were collected to September 2021. Data were collected for COVID-19 infections, the effect of COVID-related restrictions, access to specialist help for epilepsy (people with epilepsy), and the impact of the pandemic on work productivity (HCWs). The frequency of responses for non-HICs and HICs were compared using non-parametric Chi-square tests. Results: Two thousand one hundred and five individuals with epilepsy from 53 countries and 392 HCWs from 26 countries provided data. The same proportion of people with epilepsy in non-HICs and HICs reported COVID-19 infection (7%). Those in HICs were more likely to report that COVID-19 measures had affected their health (32% vs. 23%; p < 0.001). There was no difference between non-HICs and HICs in the proportion who reported difficulty in obtaining help for epilepsy. HCWs in non-HICs were more likely to report COVID-19 infection than those in HICs (18% vs 6%; p = 0.001) and that their clinical work had been affected by concerns about contracting COVID-19, lack of personal protective equipment, and the impact of the pandemic on mental health (all p < 0.001). Compared to pre-pandemic practices, there was a significant shift to remote consultations in both non-HICs and HICs (p < 0.001). Significance: While the frequency of COVID-19 infection was relatively low in these data from early in the pandemic, our findings suggest broader health consequences and an increased psychosocial burden, particularly among HCWs in non-HICs. Planning for future pandemics should prioritize mental healthcare alongside ensuring access to essential epilepsy services and expanding and enhancing access to remote consultations. Plain language summary: We asked people with epilepsy about the effects of COVID-19 on their health and healthcare. We wanted to compare responses from people in high-income countries and other countries. We found that people in high-income countries and other countries had similar levels of difficulty in getting help for their epilepsy. People in high-income countries were more likely to say that their general health had been affected. Healthcare workers in non-high-income settings were more likely to have contracted COVID-19 and have the care they deliver affected by the pandemic. Across all settings, COVID-19 associated with a large shift to remote consultations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?