Impact of epicardial adipose tissue on diastolic dysfunction in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Hirotoshi Ishikawa,Takatoshi Sugiyama,Kenichiro Otsuka,Hiroki Yamaura,Kana Hojo,Yasushi Kono,Asahiro Ito,Takanori Yamazaki,Kenei Shimada,Noriaki Kasayuki,Daiju Fukuda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae056
2024-06-05
Abstract:Aims: This study aims to investigate the association between left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) accumulation in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods and results: The study included 314 patients with preserved LVEF who underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) and thoracic tissue Doppler echocardiography (TTDE). The EAT volume was measured using CCTA. LVDD was categorized into three groups: absent LVDD, undetermined LVDD, and LVDD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between the clinical parameters, TTDE and CCTA findings, and LVDD. Patients (mean age: 66 ± 13 years; 52% men) were divided into LVDD present (30 patients, 9.6%), LVDD absent (219 patients, 69.7%), and LVDD undetermined (65 patients, 20.7%) groups. CCTA showed that patients with LVDD had a significantly higher coronary artery calcium (CAC) score and % plaque volume (%PV) than those without LVDD, whereas the prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease was comparable between the groups. The EAT volume index correlated with each LVDD diagnostic component, except for tricuspid regurgitation velocity. A multivariate model showed that age [odds ratio (OR), 1.13; P < 0.001] and EAT volume index (OR, 1.02; P = 0.038) were independently associated with LVDD, even after adjusting for left ventricular mass index (OR, 1.05; P = 0.005). There was no significant association between the CAC score and %PV or LVDD. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that EAT volume index and left ventricular mass index were robust predictors of LVDD; however, there was no independent association between coronary atherosclerotic disease burden and LVDD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?